991.2 GT3RS

[hunter 66]

Nice article on PH ....... and not April the 1 st ....... 4.2 sounds amazing .... so time to sell the Mk1 and get the order in for a Mk 2 ..... 520 BHP

Edited by hunter 66 on Monday 18th April 12:19

[DT398]

Lazy copy cat piece that's been all over the net for a few days now. Common view is that it's a turbo whatever it is and most likely a GT2 RS. I also read somewhere that the whole 4.2 story is pretty unlikely if the car were to stay n/a.

[hunter 66]

Yes a little bit of fun ............. as usual stuff ...

[Slickhillsy]

Most amusing... All those ahhh they'll never build a .2 RS or standard...

What were they thinking!

[GT4RS]

Gt2

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

That 'guff' that no-one actually said...?

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I recall some people saying (including AP) that the engine wouldn't work as well with a manual gearbox as with the PDK-S, but that's quite different to what you are claiming.

Just as people said that there were some reasons why there might not be a .2 version, although I think Apollo was more clear cut on that.

Who said it?

Edited by sidicks on Monday 18th April 20:50

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Who?

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Edited by sidicks on Monday 18th April 20:54

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

So to be clear, you are claiming i said something entirely different to what I actually said?

You are wrong, please don't misrepresent me.

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Let me help you here:

You said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

For the avoidance of doubt, denigrate = verb, to criticize unfairly; disparage.

And yet your own rules for other people are:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Please stop being impolite and 'weaselly'...

Who are these 'several people'??

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Weaselly.

[sidicks]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Wrong again - it would be your continued misrepresentation of what people have said and your inability to back up your claims - see above for details.

[Big Al.]

Jack it in you two it's getting tedious to say the least, anymore and you're out of the thread.

[Fl0pp3r]

[MDL111]

porsche forum - entertaining as always - esp the GT3 threads

[Dr S]

sidicks said:

I recall some people saying (including AP) that the engine wouldn't work as well with a manual gearbox as with the PDK-S, but that's quite different to what you are claiming.

And then they launched the 991R...

[sidicks]

Dr S said:

And then they launched the 991R...

And does the manual gearbox work as well as the PDK-S?

[Sam All]

sidicks said:

Dr S said:

And then they launched the 991R...

And does the manual gearbox work as well as the PDK-S?

Different and to many works so much better.

PDK-S is excellent, but does engage well enough for some. Enjoy yours.

[sidicks]

Sam All said:

Different and to many works so much better.

"to many"?? On a car that very few people have driven? Who has said that the GT3 engine and manual gearbox are better matched than the same engine and PDK-S gearbox? I'm pretty sure that EVO said the opposite, albeit they really enjoyed the different nature of the manual 'box.

Sam All said:

PDK-S is excellent, but does engage well enough for some. Enjoy yours.

The discussion regarding what 'works better' has never been about engagement, so that's a red herring, no-one is suggesting that the manual won't be more involving.

Edited by sidicks on Tuesday 19th April 09:13

[HokumPokum]

Sidick is very 1-dimensional in this aspect. I suggest we stop baiting him.