GT3 Cab
Author
Discussion

Gitana991

Original Poster:

188 posts

83 months

There were rumours it might be revealed this week?

Koln-RS

4,089 posts

235 months

I do hope not cry

PRO5T

6,927 posts

48 months

I’ve seen the spy shots as much as everyone else but were they not just test mules for the Speedster?

I can’t see the point in a GT3 cabriolet (well I can as but bare with me…) when they could market it as a Speedster with a funky rear clamshell and a price that eclipses the S/T.

Open top as well so all the car spotters can ogle your horrendously coloured CCX Sonderwunsch abominations at the local cars and coffee (and your willingness to spunk £100k on options just because you can).

Guyr

2,519 posts

305 months

Why the hate. They made the Speedster which is a GT3 Cab with a difficult roof. Speedsters are ok for California where it never rains, but make use harder in UK/Europe. A proper Cab roof would be much more usable, at the expense of only about 50-60kg aka a full tank of petrol.

PRO5T

6,927 posts

48 months

Guyr said:
Why the hate.
No hate from me, I can certainly see the appeal I just think Porsche like the margins on the specials. Why sell a Cabriolet for circa £10k more than a GT3 Coupe when you can sell a Speedster for £100k more?

John D.

20,214 posts

232 months

Hopefully they won't call it a GT3 cab. Not very motorsport is it?

Over over under steer

785 posts

146 months

A GT3 Cab would be the perfect car for me.

APOLO1

5,374 posts

217 months

Over over under steer said:
A GT3 Cab would be the perfect car for me.
Same for me, can not think of a better car to drive on these roads other than if it was a Cab.


elisered

318 posts

105 months

There was something on the GT Circle email about the reveal of a “new Porsche GT model” on 24th or 25th April.

PRO5T

6,927 posts

48 months

John D. said:
Hopefully they won't call it a GT3 cab. Not very motorsport is it?
The interesting point in that is what is a GT3?

For me, it’s the road going homologation of the GT3 Cup and all the cars that go above it.

They still sort of are that engine wise, I guess in years gone past a Carrera RS was really an evolution of the standard Carrera and the Cup cars and RSRs an evolution of those.

Is a GT3 now (if we consider it a Clubsport, a 4 seat Touring, an RS and maybe now a Cabriolet and special edition like S/T and Speedster) now just the original idea of a naturally aspirated 911?

RDMcG

20,488 posts

230 months

Not for me . I have some GT3RS models but when it comes to a convertible I drive a sedate old Mercedes SL500. I tried cab years ago but driving it very quickly was an unpleasant noisy uncomfortable experience . Thus I can’t really use a cab on a track for instance in a way that fully accesses its capability. I can see something like a Morgan which is more about a drive in the country but I would not want an open GT variant.

John D.

20,214 posts

232 months

PRO5T said:
John D. said:
Hopefully they won't call it a GT3 cab. Not very motorsport is it?
The interesting point in that is what is a GT3?

For me, it s the road going homologation of the GT3 Cup and all the cars that go above it.

They still sort of are that engine wise, I guess in years gone past a Carrera RS was really an evolution of the standard Carrera and the Cup cars and RSRs an evolution of those.

Is a GT3 now (if we consider it a Clubsport, a 4 seat Touring, an RS and maybe now a Cabriolet and special edition like S/T and Speedster) now just the original idea of a naturally aspirated 911?
That's my point. I like the homogolation connection with the GT3 name. Appreciate a 4 seater without the wings etc is very desirable and a great car, and the Touring doesn't bother me at all. A GT3 Cab is a step too far though biggrin

TB993tt

2,069 posts

264 months

PRO5T said:
The interesting point in that is what is a GT3?

For me, it s the road going homologation of the GT3 Cup and all the cars that go above it.

They still sort of are that engine wise, I guess in years gone past a Carrera RS was really an evolution of the standard Carrera and the Cup cars and RSRs an evolution of those.

Is a GT3 now (if we consider it a Clubsport, a 4 seat Touring, an RS and maybe now a Cabriolet and special edition like S/T and Speedster) now just the original idea of a naturally aspirated 911?
l
I've always thought that the GT3 started as a continuation of the NA Mezger engined 911s following Porsche putting the cheaper chocolate M96 3.4 litre motors into the new NA 996s. Prior to the 996 all 911s had the Mezger which by the 90s was pretty much race tested and reliable but obviously they decided it was overkill and too expensive for the NA 911s going forward cue the GT3 which developed the Mezger further and satisfied those who enjoyed the older style rawer NA 911 experience.
Going forward they devloped the current style GT3 lump which had its well documented issues but has evloved nicely and is distinctly different to the regular Carrera powertrain. It always amuses me how some people consider the GT3 harsh where for me they just carry on in the older (NA Mezger) era's footsteps where this "harshness" was a specific feature of a sportscar.

TDT

6,116 posts

142 months

PRO5T said:
The interesting point in that is what is a GT3?

For me, it s the road going homologation of the GT3 Cup and all the cars that go above it.

They still sort of are that engine wise, I guess in years gone past a Carrera RS was really an evolution of the standard Carrera and the Cup cars and RSRs an evolution of those.

Is a GT3 now (if we consider it a Clubsport, a 4 seat Touring, an RS and maybe now a Cabriolet and special edition like S/T and Speedster) now just the original idea of a naturally aspirated 911?
Yep. I do agree and have been saying this for a while.

Googlin

95 posts

1 month

The term GT3 should really be confined to close relatives of the cup cars.

I’d go as far as to say you should have a cage and bucket seats to be a GT3, everything else should be a GT or GTS or something.

A GT3 touring seems a bit of an oxymoron to me!