Costs owning a 2.5 Boxster?
Costs owning a 2.5 Boxster?
Author
Discussion

pattyg

Original Poster:

1,378 posts

248 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
I'm really tempted to buy one of the original 2.5s.

I'd only be doing around 4K miles pa. Anyone got one and give approx running costs?

Obviously a lot would depend on the condition of the car purchased but my question relates more to normal running costs pa.

PS if anyone knows a cracking example for sale let me know.

Thanks

jakesmith

9,491 posts

192 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
You are very unlikely to get away with under £1500-£2000 per year as they are 20 years old and there are loads of parts that wear out with time & mileage. Radiators, air con condensors, steering rack, springs, bushes, all the suspension bits really in fact, brakes, tires, the rear screen and the hood mechanism, etc. Nice car especially if you can do some work but just as they're £4k to buy, doesn't make them cheap to run as I found out

billzeebub

3,888 posts

220 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
£2k a year is what you should budget to maintain properly

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

107 months

Saturday 15th July 2017
quotequote all
987 owner & I'd say that has on average been around the 1-1.5k mark per annum & that includes me doing most of the remedial work, so discounting labour. Can't imagine a 986 would be a cheaper prospect in this universe.

lilwashu

260 posts

186 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
I bought a '97 2.5 last year which had done 39k miles. It had oil changes annually but the rest of the servicing was done by mileage, i.e. not much of it (was in amazing condition so I bought it anyway). Most of the work was me paying someone else to do it. It needed:

Discs/pads front and rear = £600
Minor service (aux belt, oil change, inspection) = £150
Alignment = £40
New coolant cap = £20
New tyres = £500
Assorted non important trim pieces = £40

I decided to move it on after a few months as I didn't really take to it, but I would also have been replacing the rear window or roof (£200/£650) and door membrane (£60) imminently if I had decided to keep it. The specialist that did the service said that the coffin arms needed doing, but no other specialist did, and there was never an advisory on the MOTs so I am not convinced there (watch out for specialists).

As you can see, most of my costs were due to the previous owner not spending what they should have over the years, but the asking price reflected that. As above, numerous weak points in the original 986 (coolant bottles, roof mechanisms etc) were waiting to break at some point also.

ooid

5,908 posts

121 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
You will be very lucky if some parts do not fail on these cars annually. Big fun though, definitely worth to keep a few years.

lilwashu

260 posts

186 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
Who else would you say should have spent on replacing said consumables?

mikal83

5,340 posts

273 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Why do you want to buy anice sports car with such a small underpowered engine?

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

286 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
mikal83 said:
Why do you want to buy anice sports car with such a small underpowered engine?
The uk speed limit off a motor way is only 60mph lol fast cars can be a frustration and that then = dull.

pattyg

Original Poster:

1,378 posts

248 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
The uk speed limit off a motor way is only 60mph lol fast cars can be a frustration and that then = dull.
Yes, 200 Bhp enough for me on the tight country roads around here. I had a Elise which didn't have much performance but the car didn't need it to be a great drive.

I've heard the original 2.5 Boxster is also one of the best handling of all Boxsters. I am definitely not one for big speeds. I am also now preferring the classic original Boxsters with the amber lights as opposed to later models. Budget is also a factor, a 987 is too expensive for me.

edc

9,473 posts

272 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Get over on boxa.net for any number of documented running reports. Some wait for stuff to break before replacing it others get in there first. I've got long posts on costs of my ownership of a 2000 986S and my current 2004 550.

Phunk

2,077 posts

192 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
I owned a 2.5 Boxster, it turned out that the past owner didn't take the best care of it and told a few porkies, however if you are happy to work on the car yourself it doesn't cost much to fix things.

For example:

Air Con condensors rotten (very common), Porsche wanted £800, I bought the parts myself for £100, fitted in less than a hour and a local garage gassed it up for £30.
Front disks and pads needed replaced, did these myself in a hour, about £150 in parts.
Drop links needed replaced all round, about £20 each, simple to replace.
Car was running a bit sluggish, replaced the MAF sensor with a proper Bosch one for £170, took 5 minutes.

Once I'd ironed these out and got the tracking done it was a fantastic car to own, the handling was fantastic. Being a early 2.5 it's the lightest version with a cable throttle so you really get to enjoy it at lower speeds. I owned a 996 Carrera previously and the Boxster was much more fun to drive.


bgunn

1,822 posts

152 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
The 2.5 Boxster is like the original 996 - pure and unadulterated, as it has the lowest power engine, very few driver aids and is rather analogue feeling. As said, they spin up to revs very sweetly and display the usual Porsche engine traits of a nice tractable engine with a wide power range and they sound glorious at revs.

The 2.7 is worth a look too, I had one, extremely sweet engine and very revvy - the only 'downside' is that it runs eGas rather than a mechanically actuated throttle; but it's not too intrusive and well 'mapped'.

Really good little cars, if I had the space I'd get one again to accompany my 996.

edc

9,473 posts

272 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
They are great handling cars ..... When the suspension is fresh. Most cars are on old and tired suspension. The squeaks and clinks from bushes and arms gives the most obvious audible sound but the difference between new and old dampers is like night and day.

lilwashu

260 posts

186 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Having owned a few cable/electronic throttle cars, my opinion is that normally you can't tell the difference, and if you can it's negative. I wouldn't let that affect any purchase decision, obviously this is subjective.

lilwashu

260 posts

186 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
Where did I moan? Are you insane?

ooid

5,908 posts

121 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
pattyg said:
I'm really tempted to buy one of the original 2.5s.

I'd only be doing around 4K miles pa. Anyone got one and give approx running costs?
I had 2.7 for nearly 6 years and recently sold it. This all depends on the condition really, I bought it from the first owner at 60k miles so my first 4 years, it only needed annual minor service (oil change) + consumables (tires mainly, due to driving around crappy Tower Hamlets).

After 4 years it started to need serious service items from engine department to cooling area or even exhaust... There are things like power steering pump, MAF, AOS, and o2 sensors that might fail at some point. Even if you do the work, the parts are not that cheap. Cooling is not perfect, radiators, fans and tank definitely need a massive refresh after 10 years.

I had a non A.C. car, selling it was hard but during my ownership it did not need any servicing in terms of A.C. or condensers so that gives you a bit of financial relief from the maintenance. Never had a roof mechanism issue. Suspension was alright but again I've never tracked the car.

If you can find a clean unmolested one, 2.5 is a much more solid and special car, they have been built at Stuttgart unlike the later 986s at Finland.

mikefocke

78 posts

126 months

Monday 17th July 2017
quotequote all
Certainly a lot of opinions here. I'll add a few of mine.

Owned both a Stuttgart and a Finland built Boxster, never saw any difference.

Any car over 15 years old will have parts that aged and parts that wore. Can't expect a new parts car for the price these have fallen to.

Buy one with records and a lot of maintenance done to things like suspension, plastic parts, window mechanisms, roof/hood, etc. Good tires and brake thickness (pads and rotors). Buy one where you understand the owner's motivation for selling. Get a PPI from the most experienced Porsche mechanic you can find. Expect to pay for it but also to learn a lot about the future maintenance needs of the car.

Can it be expensive to maintain even if you get the right one? Sure. Every used car is a crap shoot. I was the third owner of each of mine and the maintenance for each was less that comparable era Hondas with the same miles. Lots less expensive and never let me down. Some of that was maintenance at the beginning of my ownership, some to luck. Loved em.