Cracked Porsche 968 block - help replace.....

Cracked Porsche 968 block - help replace.....

Author
Discussion

Ray Singh

Original Poster:

3,048 posts

231 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
I have found a really nice condition, low mileage 968, however the block is cracked.

Can anyone help me with a 968 engine for a fair price? Can a 2.7 944 block be used?

Any help appreciated.



GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Saturday 15th March 2014
quotequote all
The 2.7l block would be an excellent base for a 3.0l turbo! Its the same as the S2 3.0l block, but the 968 block was different.

I understand that the squirters can be retro-fitted, but Im not sure whther the other small differences matter or not.

Richair

1,021 posts

198 months

Tuesday 18th March 2014
quotequote all
I notice you're in Wiltshire, so I'd recommend speaking with Jon Mitchell as I've no doubt he can advise the best way forwards http://www.jmgporsche.co.uk/

A9XXC

621 posts

150 months

Friday 4th April 2014
quotequote all
Maybe worthwhile calling EMC Motorsport in Birmingham too.

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
Theyre all going to say that a 2.7l/3.0l block is different, though.

Considered having it stitched?

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Wednesday 9th April 2014
quotequote all
There's a 968 block on ebay but £300 for a bare block with a scuffed bore is silly. I'd pay £100 tops, if I needed it.

FarQue

2,336 posts

199 months

Wednesday 9th April 2014
quotequote all
Maybe give Hartech a call or email. I think they've worked on a few Porsche engines and might have something knocking about.

JMGPorsche

36 posts

157 months

Thursday 10th April 2014
quotequote all
2.7 944 8v, 3.0 944S2 16v and 968 blocks are slightly different but can be interchanged but there are a few details you need to pay attention to during the build to ensure everything has the right clearances etc.

968 blocks are obviously superior in several respects as the last evolution of the 104mm bore blocks, but some of the differences such as the piston squirters are still controversial 20 years after they were used in this series of engine..

Hope this helps

Jon Mitchell

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Thursday 10th April 2014
quotequote all
How is the 968 block superior to the 2.7/S2 Jon ? Porsche were in financial strife in the early 90's and the 968 rods for example were built down to a price.

JMGPorsche

36 posts

157 months

Thursday 10th April 2014
quotequote all
It was just another evolution.

Improved windage ports between cylinders in the lower crankcase over the 2.7

Shallower waterjacket to improve coolant flow to the area of the bore actually seeing combustion.

964/993 style piston squirters directed at lower piston face for oil cooling of the pistons.

None of them cost them more money, other than probably 27p per piston squirter x 4 at their cost price, but reduced the chance of warranty claims with a car with improved performance over the previous car using a similar block (S2).

Also due to sand casting of the blocks, every time they made a block they had to make a new sand form for the block, so only minor modifications had to be made to the form/plug used to make the sand castings for the next series of blocks.

Over the years there are many changes to blocks, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986,1987, 1988, 1989, 1992. On each of these dates the 944 blocks evolved across the range. For example in 1987 both the turbo castings and the non turbo castings changed... In 1988 they had 3 new blocks being cast, each with different casting numbers, in 1989 they still had 3 blocks in current production, but a completely different set of 3 than they did in 1988.. By the time they got around to 1992, they were casting only one block, the 968 16v blocks.

Another example is 1985 and 1986, during 1985 they were already tooling up for the 1985.5 model change which used a different block, a 1985.5 944 turbo block is different to a 1986 block (the 85.5 turbo block is thicker walled), which shows in just six months they chose to use a completely different sand casting form/plug, showing how little of a cost implication there was, especially as the only reason for doing it was to save a tiny amount of weight and a little in material costs.