Irritating Adverts
Discussion
Rollcage said:
Seeing the ads won't get much - it's all about click throughs. I never bothered doing that, so I'm guilt free.
Apologies, but that's not the way it works.We do rely on campaign advertisements and impressions, not necessarily just click-throughs. Simply seeing the ads does help us run and maintain the website and we do make an effort to ensure they aren't irritating or distracting.
-Matt
MattDell said:
Apologies, but that's not the way it works.
We do rely on campaign advertisements and impressions, not necessarily just click-throughs. Simply seeing the ads does help us run and maintain the website and we do make an effort to ensure they aren't irritating or distracting.
-Matt
Ah, in that case, I'm feeling a little guilty then. Hadn't realised you got paid for page impressions.We do rely on campaign advertisements and impressions, not necessarily just click-throughs. Simply seeing the ads does help us run and maintain the website and we do make an effort to ensure they aren't irritating or distracting.
-Matt
North West Tom said:
pacman1 said:
Ah ha, has been fixed. Nice one.
It hasn't.
Yeah, I hadn't fixed anything but was hoping it was perhaps my fix last week that may have finally taken effect. It's an annoying issue as for some reason the advertisers feel a need to use a ridiculously high z-index for their adverts (which is just an arbitrary number to act as a sort of layering tool; they're using something like 1251 where a value of 1 would do just fine).
Yeah, so I suggest the F5 workaround until I can get to the bottom of this.
Another irritating 'advert'. Apparently I've won an iPad2. Do you really need advertising revenue through these sources?

can't get pic to work
can't get pic to work
Gassing Station | Website Feedback | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






