Why was "Effing Kwik-Fit" removed?
Discussion
Sorry the thread was removed but it contravened the sites no naming and shaming policy.
For reasons why we threads like this don't get a long shelf life, suggest you have a read of Ted's thread here.
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
HTH explain.
For reasons why we threads like this don't get a long shelf life, suggest you have a read of Ted's thread here.
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
HTH explain.
Some N&S posts are around on the "BIG" boy's, we have a tenancy to show some leniency on these thread as we have had feedback saying they treat these types of threads as "customer feedback".
However saying that we do trim the occasional one here and there, as long as they appear to be constructive or they get the occasional IMHO type statement they are usually overlooked.
Perhaps being party to a costly N&S issue that HM had the unfortunate privilege to get involved in during the last couple of years, one gets a little nervous on occasions.
When the classifieds work load issue dies down a little, I will request that the N&S ruling be re addressed to make them a little more consistent across the site.
However saying that we do trim the occasional one here and there, as long as they appear to be constructive or they get the occasional IMHO type statement they are usually overlooked.
Perhaps being party to a costly N&S issue that HM had the unfortunate privilege to get involved in during the last couple of years, one gets a little nervous on occasions.
When the classifieds work load issue dies down a little, I will request that the N&S ruling be re addressed to make them a little more consistent across the site.
Big Al. said:
Some N&S posts are around on the "BIG" boy's, we have a tenancy to show some leniency on these thread as we have had feedback saying they treat these types of threads as "customer feedback".
However saying that we do trim the occasional one here and there, as long as they appear to be constructive or they get the occasional IMHO type statement they are usually overlooked.
Perhaps being party to a costly N&S issue that HM had the unfortunate privilege to get involved in during the last couple of years, one gets a little nervous on occasions.
When the classifieds work load issue dies down a little, I will request that the N&S ruling be re addressed to make them a little more consistent across the site.
Fair enough, I guess there's a fine line.However saying that we do trim the occasional one here and there, as long as they appear to be constructive or they get the occasional IMHO type statement they are usually overlooked.
Perhaps being party to a costly N&S issue that HM had the unfortunate privilege to get involved in during the last couple of years, one gets a little nervous on occasions.
When the classifieds work load issue dies down a little, I will request that the N&S ruling be re addressed to make them a little more consistent across the site.
I think they probably deserve all they get on these forums though, constructive or not! They really are crap, I've never heard a good story.
Gassing Station | Website Feedback | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff