30 day ban from TV Radio and Film forum - what for?

[goldblum]

...for posting jpeg of Ms A Holden in a diaphanous t shirt. Really only trying to settle the 'What talent has she got?' argument. *sniff*

Now I know mods can make quite arbitrary decisions and if a photo is deemed nsfw then fair enough, bin it.

But it seems a little Victorian to actually ban me from the forum. Was that really necessary? Justification please.

[LikesBikes]

Don't suppose you have a link to this photo do you?

[goldblum]

Lol

[e46acs]

LikesBikes said:

Don't suppose you have a link to this photo do you?

+1

[LikesBikes]

goldblum said:

Lol

Don't laugh, it was a serious question. Purely for the purpose of judging whether or not the ban was justified you understand

[Podie]

You normally get a mail to your PH registered email address with a reason...

Also worth noting that moderating questions should be mailed to Garlick...

[goldblum]

Podie said:

You normally get a mail to your PH registered email address with a reason...

Also worth noting that moderating questions should be mailed to Garlick...

I did: nsfw. And a 30 day ban.

[goldblum]

e46acs said:

LikesBikes said:

Don't suppose you have a link to this photo do you?

+1

Purely for research reasons - yes?

There's a link up on the aforementioned thread now. (Not put up by me I hasten to add. Don't want the Haymarket bootboys shooting my dog or something).

[MiniMan64]

goldblum said:

Podie said:

You normally get a mail to your PH registered email address with a reason...

Also worth noting that moderating questions should be mailed to Garlick...

I did: nsfw. And a 30 day ban.

From which Mod?

[Bill]

It was nsfw, we don't tolerate nsfw pics... In the old days we didn't have the option of forum bans, so you should probably count yourself lucky.

[e46acs]

goldblum said:

Purely for research reasons - yes?

There's a link up on the aforementioned thread now. (Not put up by me I hasten to add. Don't want the Haymarket bootboys shooting my dog or something).

Absolutely! Purely to assist in understanding the reasoning for the banning order and if it was indeed warranted, or not.

[goldblum]

Bill said:

It was nsfw, we don't tolerate nsfw pics... In the old days we didn't have the option of forum bans, so you should probably count yourself lucky.

OK thanks for the reply. I have seen "BINNED" on threads relatively recently and assumed that was the default setting for moderately naughty pics.

[goldblum]

WHAT??? You BINNED another poster's link to the same innocuous picture after I mentioned it here? Sneaky, reeeeal sneaky.

[Bill]

Thanks for the heads up

[goldblum]

Haha

[944fan]

Now I've been binned for posting the fking link. No-one had to click on the link, it was obvious what was going to be there.

When did this place become a fascist state?

[slinky]

Paddy_N_Murphy said:

last thread that questioned Mods also got shut.

So will this one.
The rules are clear and well understood.
If you really have a big issue with moderation decisions, get in contact with Garlick.

[Bill]

Paddy_N_Murphy said:

last thread that questioned Mods also got shut.

They all do, as we've repeatedly said; if you have an issue then take it up with Garlick.

As for the fascist state comment, grow up. The rules haven't changed, we have always got rid of embedded or linked nudity.