The allegedly clocked car thread
Discussion
What happened this morning -
I see Bill's posted up a note saying 'and that's why we dont allow naming and shaming'
which had been a tad worrying in the thread wth soem posters trying to find out who was involved
Last night running through the history it looked as though the mileage wasn't too far out and could be explained by ECU updates though not certain
and the garage seemed to have dealt with faults as soon as they were brought to their attention.
The poster may have been adding one thing to another and coming up with more than was really there
and just needed some reassurance.
Or that's how it looked - was that the conclusion this morning?
I see Bill's posted up a note saying 'and that's why we dont allow naming and shaming'
which had been a tad worrying in the thread wth soem posters trying to find out who was involved
Last night running through the history it looked as though the mileage wasn't too far out and could be explained by ECU updates though not certain
and the garage seemed to have dealt with faults as soon as they were brought to their attention.
The poster may have been adding one thing to another and coming up with more than was really there
and just needed some reassurance.
Or that's how it looked - was that the conclusion this morning?
Last I saw most had come to the conclusion that it was an error on the MB computer (90k miles after 8 months when it probably should have been 9k miles).
I don't know if the poster ever put up the history.
I would have thought it would make more sense to leave the thread up (deleting reg/namd/shame) until the OP came back with the history and proved it one way or the other. Now nobody's the wiser
I don't know if the poster ever put up the history.
I would have thought it would make more sense to leave the thread up (deleting reg/namd/shame) until the OP came back with the history and proved it one way or the other. Now nobody's the wiser

NiceCupOfTea said:
Last I saw most had come to the conclusion that it was an error on the MB computer (90k miles after 8 months when it probably should have been 9k miles).
I don't know if the poster ever put up the history.
I would have thought it would make more sense to leave the thread up (deleting reg/namd/shame) until the OP came back with the history and proved it one way or the other. Now nobody's the wiser
The last I saw at about midnight was the car was showing 92k miles currently in some of the internal gubbins but that could be due to finger trouble with what looked like an ECU change early on, and 80k miles on the clock so if true not too much difference to worry about with a car that age.I don't know if the poster ever put up the history.
I would have thought it would make more sense to leave the thread up (deleting reg/namd/shame) until the OP came back with the history and proved it one way or the other. Now nobody's the wiser

The dealer had sorted a few other issues that had cropped up post sale such as frayed wires and a blown headlight bulb and when the customer said they were still unhappy gave a refund.
This was the last thing I read on a different forum:
'Thread has now been deleted on PH as the story is not quite as the OP was telling it. Paperwork shows the cars mileage currently is 92k, not when it was 9 months old, and the dealer has it advertised as 80k, so it has been clocked allegedly but not by the amount originally believed.
PH have very strict naming and shaming rules, hence the reason for deletion.'
'Thread has now been deleted on PH as the story is not quite as the OP was telling it. Paperwork shows the cars mileage currently is 92k, not when it was 9 months old, and the dealer has it advertised as 80k, so it has been clocked allegedly but not by the amount originally believed.
PH have very strict naming and shaming rules, hence the reason for deletion.'
BigLion said:
This was the last thing I read on a different forum:
'Thread has now been deleted on PH as the story is not quite as the OP was telling it. Paperwork shows the cars mileage currently is 92k, not when it was 9 months old, and the dealer has it advertised as 80k, so it has been clocked allegedly but not by the amount originally believed.
PH have very strict naming and shaming rules, hence the reason for deletion.'
That's what I posted on the MBClub UK forum.'Thread has now been deleted on PH as the story is not quite as the OP was telling it. Paperwork shows the cars mileage currently is 92k, not when it was 9 months old, and the dealer has it advertised as 80k, so it has been clocked allegedly but not by the amount originally believed.
PH have very strict naming and shaming rules, hence the reason for deletion.'
Gassing Station | Website Feedback | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




