Apparently i'm now ewenm
Apparently i'm now ewenm
Author
Discussion

_Batty_

Original Poster:

12,268 posts

279 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
glad to see the invested money is being well spent hehe

new hampsters needed smile


ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Oi! Gerrof.

HRG

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
TurboBloke was me earlier this morning... Which wasn't very pleasant for either of us biggrin

escargot

17,123 posts

246 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
I was HRG earlier, almost dashed out to buy a set of pink leathers in my excitement.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
It seems to have been happening a bit lately.

I'm just waiting to log on as Rich1231 and post that thread titled "Time for me to come out".

_Batty_

Original Poster:

12,268 posts

279 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Oi! Gerrof.
i just put your 'stang up for 20p in the classifieds.
hehe

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

279 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
slight glitch in the space time continuum. (how do you spell that?)

many others have had problems in website feedback.

Don't worry, nobody is getting access to anybody's account, it's simply that text which is needing to catch up.

They have just implemented a massive change over the weekend which should solve PH's server problems (and first glances is that it has done so) and it is a carry over from that.

I have said all this as a complete non-knower, and so any technical wrongness is not intentional.

HRG

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
escargot said:
I was HRG earlier, almost dashed out to buy a set of pink leathers in my excitement.
You too yikes I've still got 'em, you can buy them if you want biggrin

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
I was eldar for a moment. Logged out and back in and it was fixed...

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
_Batty_ said:
glad to see the invested money is being well spent hehe

new hampsters needed smile

So, how's the dating going then Batty..? hehe

Mr Will

13,719 posts

235 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Tony is correct, it is not actually logging you in as that person, it is just showing the wrong page.

I'm working on this a the moment to try and narrow down the cause, but I can't seem to make it do it at this end which is slowing down the process.

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
I just became tricky dickie briefly - a quick press of F5 sorted that out.

RacingPete

9,196 posts

233 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Is it possible for all those that are getting a different username to let us know what ISP they are using? Wondering if there is something funny going on across ISPs further down the cacheing line.

Cheers thumbup

escargot

17,123 posts

246 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Sky broadband here Pete.

HRG

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Static IP from MurphX here... I haven't noticed it, but every man and his dog seems to be claiming to be me biggrin

rich1231

17,340 posts

289 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
It seems to have been happening a bit lately.

I'm just waiting to log on as Rich1231 and post that thread titled "Time for me to come out".
Don't think I didnt notice this.

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
rich1231 said:
10 Pence Short said:
It seems to have been happening a bit lately.

I'm just waiting to log on as Rich1231 and post that thread titled "Time for me to come out".
Don't think I didnt notice this.
rofl

miniman

30,017 posts

291 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
We had a similar problem recently with exactly the same manifestation. Our Squid reverse proxies were not serving a cached copy but we found that some proxies within a major client of ours were set to super-aggressive caching and the only way we could stop them serving up a cached copy was to put a pragma: no-cache on the pages - but clearly this isn't going to help in this case.

Are you attempting user-level caching? If so I can ask for some input from our ops guys who have done a lot of work on this recently (albeit LAMP rather than IIS).

RacingPete

9,196 posts

233 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
miniman said:
We had a similar problem recently with exactly the same manifestation. Our Squid reverse proxies were not serving a cached copy but we found that some proxies within a major client of ours were set to super-aggressive caching and the only way we could stop them serving up a cached copy was to put a pragma: no-cache on the pages - but clearly this isn't going to help in this case.

Are you attempting user-level caching? If so I can ask for some input from our ops guys who have done a lot of work on this recently (albeit LAMP rather than IIS).
We haven't implemented any user-level caching across the site, the main caching was done for the classifeds and we tried to keep the forums alone. We are going to try the pragma: no-cache across the pages to see if that stops the caching further down the line.

miniman

30,017 posts

291 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Suspect it will help matters even if it is rather a blunt tool. Generating an Etag for each page would be another possibility but I think that is slightly less reliable. What we found is that it's an area where there appear to be no real standards. Different proxies seem to ignore or adhere to the settings passed with the page rather at random.