REQUEST: view 500 posts on one page ?
REQUEST: view 500 posts on one page ?
Author
Discussion

jackal

Original Poster:

11,251 posts

311 months

Monday 10th November 2008
quotequote all
i'd love to go through the post pictures of amazing aircraft thread but it would be so much easire if i could wait a few mins and load the whole thread on one page.. its just all too time consuming to keep clicking through 50 pages or more

would this be possible ?

Taita

7,995 posts

232 months

Monday 10th November 2008
quotequote all
Think of the hamsters!

RacingPete

9,197 posts

233 months

Monday 10th November 2008
quotequote all
I am afraid it is limited by power of our systems to provide the information. Though it isn't going to add a massive load to the site we need to do some performance checks against it. I will have a look into the effects of us upping the number of posts per page.

jackal

Original Poster:

11,251 posts

311 months

Monday 10th November 2008
quotequote all
thanks !

even upping by a few more posts

some of these 50+ page threads are a bit mental to read

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th November 2008
quotequote all
I changed the 'number of posts' setting to the maximum and it's much better to follow long threads (though even longer would be great!)

From other members' responses, it seems that not many users do though. Given that hardly anyone uses dial-up anymore, maybe the default setting for number of posts per page should be set at 40 or 80, letting people opt to have less if they are a user on a slow connection.

RacingPete

9,197 posts

233 months

Wednesday 12th November 2008
quotequote all
An interesting idea though I have to look at it with a commercial eye too.

If we change the number of default posts it will have a knock on to lots of other things and they could be good or bad for the site.
  • It could result in number of page impressions dropping which then means a drop in ads served
  • Also drop in page impressions could result in a drop in our rankings and affect future revenue and ad campaigns
  • But it could mean that the number of seconds someone stays on our site is longer and they read more per click (thus search engine positioning goes up)
  • Also the processing load on the servers will be affected by the increased amount of information they have to generate that might result in slow down of performance on the site
  • But then with less pages being served it might increase performance
So it is quite a tricky decision to make smile

The Excession

11,669 posts

279 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
An interesting idea though I have to look at it with a commercial eye too.

If we change the number of default posts it will have a knock on to lots of other things and they could be good or bad for the site.
  • It could result in number of page impressions dropping which then means a drop in ads served
  • Also drop in page impressions could result in a drop in our rankings and affect future revenue and ad campaigns
  • But it could mean that the number of seconds someone stays on our site is longer and they read more per click (thus search engine positioning goes up)
  • Also the processing load on the servers will be affected by the increased amount of information they have to generate that might result in slow down of performance on the site
  • But then with less pages being served it might increase performance
So it is quite a tricky decision to make smile
Interesting thoughts Pete, aside from the fact that the pictures aren't hosted on PH, there's also another consideration, you actually produce fewer hits on the database, although the queries might have to run a little longer...

Tough one to call!

xiphias

5,889 posts

256 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
I know some people might object, but couldn't you just double the ads for a 40post per page?

RacingPete

9,197 posts

233 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
I have just checked the take-up of people to changing the number of replies per page and it is quite small so we could look at extending to more posts as an option, but I wouldn't want to change the default amount of posts at the moment.

We are moving to a new hardware design for the site in the first quarter of next year so we will look into this again then.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
I have just checked the take-up of people to changing the number of replies per page and it is quite small so we could look at extending to more posts as an option, but I wouldn't want to change the default amount of posts at the moment.

We are moving to a new hardware design for the site in the first quarter of next year so we will look into this again then.
The majority of people never consult the settings of forums. If you want 'x' to happen, it needs to be Admin led.

RacingPete

9,197 posts

233 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
V8mate said:
The majority of people never consult the settings of forums. If you want 'x' to happen, it needs to be Admin led.
Agreed, which is why we can make the change in the settings as requsted above and why changing to 40 posts per page is a big decision.