Why aren’t there more convertibles?
Discussion
I guess the answer is 'because they're spending their research budget getting the meat and two veg models right first'
but is there anything further that is preventing even one, brave manufacturer to bring out a soft top EV ?
Weight? flex? batteries in the lower tray without a stiff roof to hold it together ?
I would have thought a little (fiat 124 / mx5) electric car with a 180 mile range and 6 second ish to 60 would be ideal - perfect city / weekend / fun car ?
but is there anything further that is preventing even one, brave manufacturer to bring out a soft top EV ?
Weight? flex? batteries in the lower tray without a stiff roof to hold it together ?
I would have thought a little (fiat 124 / mx5) electric car with a 180 mile range and 6 second ish to 60 would be ideal - perfect city / weekend / fun car ?
Convertibles make up a tiny % of ICE sales, so really not the market for them in the Ev worldat the minute I'd suggest.
I always thought the drivetrain from the 120h i3 would make a great platform for a 2 seater. 180bhp, RWD, 200 miles of range, relatively lightweight. Only downside would be the 50kW max charge rate.
I always thought the drivetrain from the 120h i3 would make a great platform for a 2 seater. 180bhp, RWD, 200 miles of range, relatively lightweight. Only downside would be the 50kW max charge rate.
SWoll said:
Convertibles make up a tiny % of ICE sales, so really not the market for them in the Ev worldat the minute I'd suggest.
I always thought the drivetrain from the 120h i3 would make a great platform for a 2 seater. 180bhp, RWD, 200 miles of range, relatively lightweight. Only downside would be the 50kW max charge rate.
I don’t even see the 50kW being a downside. My Mk1 TT roadster is the kind of car that I take out on nice days and do at most 100 miles at a time. I could happily cope with 50kW, indeed I’d probably never charge it away from home.I always thought the drivetrain from the 120h i3 would make a great platform for a 2 seater. 180bhp, RWD, 200 miles of range, relatively lightweight. Only downside would be the 50kW max charge rate.
Rumour has it that the 718 Cayman / Boxster replacement will be an EV. Boxster is still a strong seller (OK, nowhere near Macan sakes) so I'd be surprised if it doesn't arrive in the next few years.
Battery tech is improving and solid state batteries will offer double the density of the current cells, so who knows, maybe the weight penalty of the battery will half over the next few years and niche models will only be 100Kg heavier than the ICE alternative?
Battery tech is improving and solid state batteries will offer double the density of the current cells, so who knows, maybe the weight penalty of the battery will half over the next few years and niche models will only be 100Kg heavier than the ICE alternative?
Pixelpeep 135 said:
I guess the answer is 'because they're spending their research budget getting the meat and two veg models right first'
but is there anything further that is preventing even one, brave manufacturer to bring out a soft top EV ?
Weight? flex? batteries in the lower tray without a stiff roof to hold it together ?
I would have thought a little (fiat 124 / mx5) electric car with a 180 mile range and 6 second ish to 60 would be ideal - perfect city / weekend / fun car ?
Market demand and car makers slow to react I suspect. Rag tops always cost more, so would be a premium on a premium. And EV's seem to be priced as high as car makers dare at the moment.but is there anything further that is preventing even one, brave manufacturer to bring out a soft top EV ?
Weight? flex? batteries in the lower tray without a stiff roof to hold it together ?
I would have thought a little (fiat 124 / mx5) electric car with a 180 mile range and 6 second ish to 60 would be ideal - perfect city / weekend / fun car ?
I drove the MINI electric last year. Crap range, but I liked the car very much. If they'd done it as a convertible I'd have likely ordered one by now.
The only convertible I have owned ( and still own) is a 2003 SL500 which I bought new. The attraction was that it had a proper metal roof. I always felt that the soft tops tended to deteriorate over time.
Secondly, I would not buy a performance convertible as in my experience they are noisy over 70 MPH in general with the top down. I recall taking a Porsche 997 convertible for a quick run in the desert and finding it unpleasant when running hard.
Thus the old Mercedes fits the bill. Quiet, unhurried and not a sports car.
Secondly, I would not buy a performance convertible as in my experience they are noisy over 70 MPH in general with the top down. I recall taking a Porsche 997 convertible for a quick run in the desert and finding it unpleasant when running hard.
Thus the old Mercedes fits the bill. Quiet, unhurried and not a sports car.
Panamax said:
Imagine a typical convertible with the doors open. The whole car is supported by a fairly narrow slice of floor. Now make the floor of the car massively heavier - and see if you can get the doors shut.
I think you mean massively heavier and also massively stronger...........Gassing Station | EV and Alternative Fuels | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







