Mazda 6 - decent used buy?
Mazda 6 - decent used buy?
Author
Discussion

carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Trawling through the classifieds and have decided on something with a boot for the golf clubs.

Local guy selling a Mazda 6, unfortunately sold just before we got there, but thought it was a very nice car to look at and a lot of motor for 4k. Having a look online and there are some really nice 2006/7 models, and then a new model in 2008... can anyone tell me is it just a facelift? I know there is a brand new mazda 6 now so am guessing so.

Got my heart set on a manual 2.0 petrol - can anyone advise on the ownership experience? Anything to look out for? Am going for a 2006/7 with no more than 70k. is the estate a good alternative to the hatch? Also would I be better raising the dollars and going for the facelift - I intend to keep this for a good 2-3 years.

Ta!

V8RX7

28,982 posts

292 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
I bought my wife a 2.3 Sport.

Fantastic VFM.

They drive well and tend to be well spec'd

Downsides:
Rusty arches
Relatively poor mpg
AVOID diesels

carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
I bought my wife a 2.3 Sport.

Fantastic VFM.

They drive well and tend to be well spec'd

Downsides:
Rusty arches
Relatively poor mpg
AVOID diesels
What's the diesel issue? I am erring on a petrol anyways, possibly a 2.3 as the mileage won't be big, but I have seen some nice 2.2 diesel cars online?

gog440

9,298 posts

219 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
carparkno1 said:
What's the diesel issue? I am erring on a petrol anyways, possibly a 2.3 as the mileage won't be big, but I have seen some nice 2.2 diesel cars online?
Ask LIFE SAAB ITCH on here about mazda diesels and their chocolate camshafts.

matchmaker

9,033 posts

229 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
carparkno1 said:
V8RX7 said:
I bought my wife a 2.3 Sport.

Fantastic VFM.

They drive well and tend to be well spec'd

Downsides:
Rusty arches
Relatively poor mpg
AVOID diesels
What's the diesel issue? I am erring on a petrol anyways, possibly a 2.3 as the mileage won't be big, but I have seen some nice 2.2 diesel cars online?
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=110...


carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
blimey cheers for that! petrol it is.

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

244 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
I had a 2.0 TS on a 56 plate from new...

Cruise, elec windows, parking sensors, digital climate etc

Handled nicely, went well, was comfy and well equipped, the boot is brilliant. Liked a drink if pushed.

Road noise was far more than the Passat I had previously and I have to admit it did irritate me on long journeys. Interior plastic marked a bit easily (the grey bits by the handbrake etc) but the layout was good and very user friendly. The next generation ones I didn't like - felt they'd messed up the dashboard good and proper (mind you I like really the X-type so I'm a bit fuddy duddy!)

Sill think they're a good buy and a couple of friends have them.

carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Six Fiend said:
I had a 2.0 TS on a 56 plate from new...

Cruise, elec windows, parking sensors, digital climate etc

Handled nicely, went well, was comfy and well equipped, the boot is brilliant. Liked a drink if pushed.

Road noise was far more than the Passat I had previously and I have to admit it did irritate me on long journeys. Interior plastic marked a bit easily (the grey bits by the handbrake etc) but the layout was good and very user friendly. The next generation ones I didn't like - felt they'd messed up the dashboard good and proper (mind you I like really the X-type so I'm a bit fuddy duddy!)

Sill think they're a good buy and a couple of friends have them.
I quite fancy one of the special eds but they are rare - the standard one is good looking though so I am going to have a proper look - not sure about all the trim levels but TS seems to have all that I could need?

Life Saab Itch

37,069 posts

217 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
you are on the right lines with going for a petrol one.

Avoid the diesel at all costs. they have major design faults and WILL fk up on you.

MondeoMan1981

2,457 posts

212 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
I had a 2003 2.0 petrol saloon.

Good drive, loads of space, interior a really nice place to sit.

For a standard 2.0 n/a engine it makes a lovely sound when pushed and there is useful daily grunt from it. Not as thirsty as I thought it would be.

Rusty arches are the main issue with them. I had zero other problems with mine.

Harji

2,224 posts

190 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Funny you should mention the Mazda 6, I've noticed an increase of these cars on the road recently, certainly on my daily commute.

carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Right decision made, now to find one!

V8RX7

28,982 posts

292 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Gumtree is a good place to find them.

Absolutely stole ours a year ago -

2006, 2.3 Sport, Leather, Nav, FSH, etc 49k £2300

Bill

58,543 posts

284 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
Gumtree is a good place to find them.

Absolutely stole ours a year ago -

2006, 2.3 Sport, Leather, Nav, FSH, etc 49k £2300
Jesus, I thought we did well to get our 2l 53 plate for £1800. As others have said the 2l petrol is a decent engine with a chain cam, they drive well and are reliable (diesels and rusty arches aside). The estates manage a good boot and decent leg room in the back, with big doors for loading progeny. Very pleased with ours.

Sir Fergie

795 posts

164 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Have heard about the diesels been on the hopeless side.

But the rusty arches situation - just how bad is that particular issue - and should it turn one off a petrol version.

Sir Fergie

Bill

58,543 posts

284 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Ours is fine, so they're better than a Merc of the same era biggrin TBH it's the only thing to worry about on them, and it's easily (AFAIK) fixed.

V8RX7

28,982 posts

292 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
Sir Fergie said:
But the rusty arches situation - just how bad is that particular issue - and should it turn one off a petrol version.

Sir Fergie
Just know to check and haggle accordingly.

Ours (06, 49k) had been DIY'd on the rears but unless you inspected them you'd not know. A year later and nothing has changed.

As long as it's not full of filler I'd not worry much.

Sir Fergie

795 posts

164 months

Monday 15th April 2013
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
Just know to check and haggle accordingly.

Ours (06, 49k) had been DIY'd on the rears but unless you inspected them you'd not know. A year later and nothing has changed.

As long as it's not full of filler I'd not worry much.
Thank you very much.

These weren't/aren't on my radar due to the reliability issues on the diesels - and the fact that most irish petrol 6s seem to be 1.8s.

But at the "snotter" end of the market one has to be open to all options - so while the diesels are bad news on the 6 - a nice petrol one is always a possibility.

Alas its highly unlikely to be a 2.3 with 49 k on the clock though biggrin.

Sir Fergie

carparkno1

Original Poster:

1,438 posts

187 months

Tuesday 16th April 2013
quotequote all
Going to look at a 2.3 tonight - here's hoping wink

TwistingMyMelon

6,505 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th April 2013
quotequote all
Just ran mine for a year , thinking of moving on now, its a 2006, one of the last of that model, overall its been a good car:

Goood:
Haven't spent a penny, granted the clutch needs doing, nothing has gone wrong in 15K and car is on 80K. Good to maintain, no cam belt on 2.0 petrol at least and even tyres were only £60 for decent mid range

Pulls well for a 2.0, 150bhp with VVT, you do have to rev it mind

Boot is huge (hatch), as big as smaller estates, seats fold flat very easily to create level platform

Kit is great on my ts2: climate, bose stereo, cruise, sunroof etc

Handles well for what it is on a back road, coupled with a revy engine

Very cheap for what they offer,

Looks OK for what it is

Bad:

Rusty arches, loads I looked at suffered and mine was fine a year ago but is just starting to bubble, exactly the same as my Mk1 MX5, you would think Mazda would have learnt

The trim feels a bit flmisy after a year of hard use, nothing has fallen off but it does feel like it was done on a budget, kinda like a French car, but being Jap nothing has fallen off. After 80k of family use, a bulb has gone behind the temp control and the rear passenger window wont open from the front, but will from the rear, so pretty good.

Road noise is pretty high on motorways , I guess tyres could play a part, but there aint much insulation

A bit thirsty, but then again its a 2,0 petrol so what am I expecting?? I thought it would run a bit leaner, esp when cold

Clutch is a bit weak, but mine has lasted to 80k and needs doing, I saw a few with similar

It didnt start once, I left it for 5 mins and it started first time!!! Typical Jap it fixed itself!

Stay away from the diesel.....seriously...just dont

Overall great cars, I wanted a 2.0 estate as they are huge and great buy, but I couldn't find any for sale at all, there were a fair few 2,3's which I kinda wish I went for , but I'm not sure how much worse the fuel would have been.

I'm only moving on as the rust is bothering me and I want something "solider"