£500+ Tax Bracket!
£500+ Tax Bracket!
Author
Discussion

Benengo

Original Poster:

647 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
I've been browsing the classifieds and really fancy an alfa 159 Q4. Currently they are excellent value to buy but i am really put off by the enormous annual road tax (£535!) which is well over 10% the value of the car.

I guess the reason they can be had so cheaply is this running cost... and this itself is a good negotiating tool on the buying price. But it really puts me off as i expect it will be very difficult to sell on in 5 years when the annual road tax is 30-40% of the purchase price!

Any thoughts on whether its likely to change tax brackets as it start to age further, or is always going to cost this much?


orangefzr

179 posts

104 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
It makes you sick doesn't it, I was paying £300 a year for a mk1 focus st, I got rid of it and bought a tdi £120 a year, which is a worse polluter and no where as much fun to drive

Previous

1,646 posts

183 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Its probably best to consider that you will likely be the last owner, and factor into your decision that the residual cost will essentially be scrap value (or breaking for parts). That way anything else is a bonus.

I quite fancy a s5 v8.... But same problem.

Tax will also keep rising as well....

Edited by Previous on Sunday 18th March 12:04

DonkeyApple

69,570 posts

198 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
It’s an interesting question as to what is going to happen to these cars as the tax does manifestly alter the bangernomics aspect going forward. Are they just going to end up being scrapped well before their time or driven by people who simply don’t pay the tax.

Chris Type R

8,937 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
That's an upside to my GT 3.2 V6 - registered prior to Mar 2006, so 305 rather than 535. Personally £535 would be hard to stomach as I only do 1-2k miles per annum.

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
12 quid a week is't really a lot, if it bothers you that much get a lower tax car.

Plate spinner

18,084 posts

229 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
It’s closed market dynamics so look at it the other way... if it didn’t have expensive tax, it would likely cost far more to buy in the first place.

Well, that’s the man maths I use...

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

155 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Benengo said:
Any thoughts on whether its likely to change tax brackets as it start to age further
Unlikely. They've never done any other retrospective change to the way in which banding works, except when they brought in the <1550cc band back in the 90s. So 2001-17 cars are always likely to be CO2 taxed, and 2006-17 are going to have a pricier top band, right up until they hit 40yo.

Chris Type R

8,937 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Thesprucegoose said:
12 quid a week is't really a lot, if it bothers you that much get a lower tax car.
Less than that.

jeremyh1

1,505 posts

156 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Thesprucegoose said:
12 quid a week is't really a lot, if it bothers you that much get a lower tax car.
I agree
Most of the people here are moaning because they have to put their hand in their pocket not because they are poor !

If 10 or 12 quid is a lot of money for then forget that car as you are living above your means

Benengo

Original Poster:

647 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
My prediction is that cars that we’re already rareish or a bit different but with this problem, will become very rare and could become very desirable classics as they age and their numbers reduce. This will in turn push the price up and one day the tax/value issues will not matter a bit!

Edited by Benengo on Sunday 18th March 12:25

Alias218

1,525 posts

191 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Unfortunately, road tax is just one of those things that needs to be factored into the running costs of a car.

I don't doubt the top band's true purpose is to hasten the demise of the cars to which it applies.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

122 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Thesprucegoose said:
12 quid a week is't really a lot, if it bothers you that much get a lower tax car.
52 x 12 isn't 535.

Mr E

23,033 posts

288 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
jeremyh1 said:
Thesprucegoose said:
12 quid a week is't really a lot, if it bothers you that much get a lower tax car.
I agree
Most of the people here are moaning because they have to put their hand in their pocket not because they are poor !

If 10 or 12 quid is a lot of money for then forget that car as you are living above your means
People are bad at maths (just look at the numbers taking on large debt obligations to save a few quid a year on tax/fuel).

I bought a car that was top rate of tax. Even having just paid a very large amount of money for the car, having to then pay another £500+ to drive it away smarted a bit.

If the car is only a few multiples of the tax, it will put people off.
It used to be that it was sold with some tax, thus softening the blow. No longer.

kingswood

159 posts

105 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
my R32 is the same, cheap at twice the price!

i pay monthly at about £48 i think. it is just one of the inflated costs of running a V6, fuel will be mid 20's, the 4wd will need servcing etc.

as people have said, people buy these types of cars and cant afford to run them, hence loads of owners and a scrappy SH.

id buy it and to h*ll with the costs, it wont be long before you wouldnt be able to buy V6/8 cars then youll regret it

orangefzr

179 posts

104 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
jeremyh1 said:
I agree
Most of the people here are moaning because they have to put their hand in their pocket not because they are poor !

If 10 or 12 quid is a lot of money for then forget that car as you are living above your means

My point was though my focus st was probably only worth £5-600 and paying half or over half of the cars value in road tax a year was somewhat annoying

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
FN2TypeR said:
52 x 12 isn't 535.
The pedantic posters always turn up, you pay slightly more monthly, i put weekly as in reality it is less than sky tv most pay.

orangefzr

179 posts

104 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
kingswood said:
my R32 is the same, cheap at twice the price!

i pay monthly at about £48 i think. it is just one of the inflated costs of running a V6, fuel will be mid 20's, the 4wd will need servcing etc.

as people have said, people buy these types of cars and cant afford to run them, hence loads of owners and a scrappy SH.

id buy it and to h*ll with the costs, it wont be long before you wouldnt be able to buy V6/8 cars then youll regret it
Very good point there, I have actually been looking at some older tt's with that engine in recently

Benbay001

5,888 posts

186 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
Actually, its more like £4 a week..
Realistically youre not going to be weighing up a zero VED car versus a 225g/km car, which means the other car is more than likely £305 a year.
£530-£305 = £225.

£225 / 52 weeks of the year = £4

Its really not much, especially when a tyre on a 225 g/km car is likely to cost around £200..

f1nn

2,694 posts

221 months

Sunday 18th March 2018
quotequote all
If you really want a car, is £500+ a year road tax a deal breaker?

I get that we'd all rather not pay it, but it really isn't a lot of money if it means you can run the car you fancy.