Small engine auto, are they ok?
Small engine auto, are they ok?
Author
Discussion

jvr

Original Poster:

789 posts

267 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
As title
Looking at a small engine diesel auto due to difficulties on my leg after a major op.ive a big engine auto which is great but a bit juicy for my 25000 miles a year.
So small engine auto are they ok or not

Thoughts

Cheers
P

jamei303

3,043 posts

176 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
They're fine with modern auto boxes, the days of needing a big engine in order to have an auto are long gone.

OldGermanHeaps

4,819 posts

198 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
IMO no.
Test driven a few new small diesel autos and they all were a let down, mrs didnt like them either.
We got an older 3.0tdi auto and the money we would have spent on depreciation more than covers the extra fual and maintenance.
Maybe our expectations were too high but they are still more sluggish than manuals, and these new 8 speed autos just dont seem anymore refined than an 10 year old 6 speed auto.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

128 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
What car are you looking at? Our opinion isnt as important as yours so go and try one.

caziques

2,784 posts

188 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all

I have had a Honda Logo auto for many years, (2 door).

Great to drive, does about 50 to the gallon.

Most of the family have been caught speeding in it.

Still good after 150,000 miles.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

128 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Its easy to speed in any car so thats not really a good measure.

edc

9,457 posts

271 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
The 1.0 VW DSG seems perfectly fine. In many respects a better combo that the C55 AMG auto I had in the recent past.

Tomo1971

1,171 posts

177 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Not sure what your budget is but consider the 1.4 or 1.5 TFSI in VW Group cars (Skoda / SEAT etc) - they can be quite pokey when needed but economical when just pottering about. They use ACT (Active Cylinder Technology) and switch off 2 of the cylinders when just tootling along - incl at motorway speeds under light loads.

I have had a couple of the DSG versions as hire cars and seemed to be getting 45 to 50 MPG from them.

Appreciate you are doing decent miles and DPF shouldnt be an issue but if something in the next few years affects diesel prices, you wont be affected.

vikingaero

12,012 posts

189 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Times have changed. Gone are the days when people used to say that you need a 2.0 litre car for motorway use.

Out smallest auto has a 0.66 litre turbocharged engine and it my favourite car.

jackh707

2,132 posts

176 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Had a newish A3 1.6 diesel hire car in Italy, it was very frugal and more than enough grunt to cruise at 130kmh, actually reall nice little car.

Would now consider a 1.6tdi auto as a serious proposition.

jvr

Original Poster:

789 posts

267 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Budget not really more than 7000
My current one is a 2007 e class 320 cdi so overall about 35mpg ,many in my price range seem to be French with the EGS box or Astra autos which will do about 45mpg but they are with 2 litre engines.
I was more about 1.5 and smaller

P

AC43

13,109 posts

228 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
I'd say that if you're getting a diesel surely the best thing would be to get one with an auto. At least you won't have to keep changing gears yourself to keep in the power band.

I hired a small diesel engined 2006 at Easter and it was a PITA with a manual. It was forever either dropping off the bottom of the power band or running out of puff at the other end.

I hired a larger-engined 500X in August and it wasn't so bad but still that had that iritiating nothing-surge-nothing power delivery.

Trying to modulate it all the time with gear changes and throttle adjustments was tiresome.

I find it the same as a passenger in manual diesel car. It's almost impossible to drive them smoothly in stop start conditions.

I'd get a conventional or DSG auto all day long.


DoubleD

22,154 posts

128 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Ive driven small engine manual diesels and found it easy to drive smoothly in slow moving traffic.

OP you need to drive some. Its your opinion that matters, not ours.

craigjm

20,171 posts

220 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Will this be in addition to the E or in replacement? Small autos are fine these days but if you are considering selling the car you have to gain possibly 15mpg but lose space and practicality I don’t think I would bother. Running costs will reduce by about 30% but at what cost to everything else that’s important

DoubleD

22,154 posts

128 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
A large car is only important if that is what you need

jvr

Original Poster:

789 posts

267 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
I don't need a big estate, however I do a lot of motorway miles its comfy and quiet and pretty quick being the 3 ltr V6

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

218 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
A large car is only important if that is what you need
They are
1. Safer - if rear ended you have the whole estate to crush through before getting to rear seats let alone the front seats. Loook at that hoffiric crash on the A34 small car squashed to nothingfrown
2. It’s a luxury car too loads of extra kit you’d not have on a lesser car
3. Seat comfort will be massively higher on the E class
4. Depreciation will be vastly lower.
5. Better the devil you know especially at the £7k mark.
6. It’s more environmentally friendly to run a car for as long as possible maximising the energy it used to create it in the first place.
7. You could remap it - and map it for more economy

DoubleD

22,154 posts

128 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
DoubleD said:
A large car is only important if that is what you need
They are
1. Safer - if rear ended you have the whole estate to crush through before getting to rear seats let alone the front seats. Loook at that hoffiric crash on the A34 small car squashed to nothingfrown
2. It’s a luxury car too loads of extra kit you’d not have on a lesser car
3. Seat comfort will be massively higher on the E class
4. Depreciation will be vastly lower.
5. Better the devil you know especially at the £7k mark.
6. It’s more environmentally friendly to run a car for as long as possible maximising the energy it used to create it in the first place.
7. You could remap it - and map it for more economy
Maybe. But like I said, a large car is only important if you need a large car.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

218 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
Maybe. But like I said, a large car is only important if you need a large car.
But if you already have it then it’s a different question you can live with the “large car” aspect as motorway driving and frankly any road driving makes no difference - you’ve lived with it so could live with it some more.

A small car doing 25k a year - small in my eyes is VW Lupo BTW - would be hell.

Schermerhorn

4,350 posts

209 months

Saturday 6th October 2018
quotequote all
My sister's auto 1.3 VVTi Toyota Yaris is pretty nippy at town speeds. It struggles at over 60mph but as a town car it's pretty brilliant.