Save £XXXX on new!
Save £XXXX on new!
Author
Discussion

Northernchimp

Original Poster:

1,282 posts

153 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Does this bother anybody else?

Motorpoint do it on fairly new cars like this... https://www.motorpoint.co.uk/vehicleadvert/mazda/m...

Which is a decent alternative to buying new, 68 plate, 237 miles, nearly full warranty in tact, meaningful saving over new which seems fair enough.

But then you get places like this... https://www.availablecar.com/used-bmw/x1_sdrive-18...

Claiming a saving of £15,881 vs new... on a 7 year old car with 64,000 miles, on a car they don't make anymore because it's been replaced. Surely the argument that I could save £8999 by not buying it at all is no less flimsy. They're on TV all the time pedalling this nonsense.

Surely 1) that isn't legal, it's definitely sharp practice if it is legal and 2) people aren't stupid enough to think they're saving £15,881?







Davie_GLA

6,821 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
That’s pretty sketchy indeed. What about this bad boy. £30k “saving”

https://www.availablecar.com/used-bmw/5_530d-3.0-m...


Northernchimp

Original Poster:

1,282 posts

153 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
Davie_GLA said:
That’s pretty sketchy indeed. What about this bad boy. £30k “saving”

https://www.availablecar.com/used-bmw/5_530d-3.0-m...
Yet still manages to be about £1500 overpriced.

anonymous-user

75 months

Thursday 21st February 2019
quotequote all
"only" <insert inflated price>

Also when they say "includes free *something*". It's not bloody free! You ARE paying for it.

Edit: What's going on with the APR? 7.9% in the photo yet all finance quotes in the calculator are 11.9%.

Edited by mstrbkr on Thursday 21st February 21:08

anonymous-user

75 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all
On what basis do you think it shouldn’t be legal?

The car was £x when new, it’s now £y, it’s factual to state that it’s now £x-£y less than buying it new.

Sure, it’s a pointless comparison and totally irrelevant, but it is factual.

Davie_GLA

6,821 posts

220 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all
charltjr said:
On what basis do you think it shouldn’t be legal?

The car was £x when new, it’s now £y, it’s factual to state that it’s now £x-£y less than buying it new.

Sure, it’s a pointless comparison and totally irrelevant, but it is factual.
it's not a saving though on current market value. They are wording it as if the car is still worth what it was when new.

Not sure on legality but it still feels underhand. Motorpoint do it differently by basing any savings on nearly new cars.

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

191 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all


Can't see an issue with it.

pfnsht

2,526 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all
Factual yes but still pointless to the clued on buyer. However a lot of people are not and will see a huge saving, overlook the inflated selling price and think they're getting a good deal.

Sheepshanks

38,877 posts

140 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all
I was thinking the ASA wouldn't be happy about it, but: https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/available-car-ltd-a...

Jamescrs

5,758 posts

86 months

Friday 22nd February 2019
quotequote all
I bought a car from Available Car, not a bad place at all to be fair as car dealers go.

Anyway to answer the post,

I only found it interesting so far as having a passing interest in what the car list price was new, it had no bearing on my purchase though, the car I bought I liked and actually I thought it was a decent price so I bought it, they don't negotiate on their windscreen price and make most of their money trying to sell extras, finance etc which I didn't bother with any of.