Fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost vs 1.25 Zetec
Fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost vs 1.25 Zetec
Author
Discussion

lpop80

Original Poster:

6 posts

93 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
Hi,

I'm looking at buying a used Fiesta (2-3 years old). I've read positive things about the Ecoboost model but there seems to be approx £2K price difference between the Ecoboost and the 1.25 Zetec models.

Is the Ecoboost worth the extra and in cost terms will it be cheaper to run?

Thanks!

Truckosaurus

12,834 posts

305 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
If 'cheaper to run' was high up my list of priorities I'd buy the cheaper 1.25 with the expectation that it has less to go wrong on it.

If 'better car' was high up my list of priorities I'd buy the Ecoboost. (Or more likely an ST)

budgie smuggler

5,907 posts

180 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
I've got a 1.25, don't get one if you can get the 1.0 instead, the 1.25 engine is flat as a fart.

We're a 'Ford family' so I've had a lot of 1.25 Fiestas, the latest are a lot lot slower than e.g. the mk 5 or mk6. Whether that's because of the extra weight in the car or they've mapped it for better co2/nox I don't know. All I know is it's annoying to drive.

V6todayEVmanana

831 posts

165 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
Have a listen to the EcoBoost in this:

https://youtu.be/tmZMwk14r4c

I want one

sedatepace

70 posts

95 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
I've driven loads of MK7 and 8 Fiesta's.

While the Ecoboost 1.0 (100 and 125ps) are a nice drive, I actually prefer the 1.25 or 1.1 in the MK8.

If I were leasing then I would chose the Ecoboost as I am still not sure about overall reliably. My own money would be on the 1.25 or 1.1.

Also standard security is practically worthless so budget for an aftermarket solution as they can be gone in less than 30 seconds.

pozi

1,725 posts

208 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
I would take the 1.0 Ecoboost over the small NA engine.

The only downside with the 100PS Ecoboost is they are a bit gutless low down in the rev range and coupled with the high gearing you end up holding 3rd for tootling along at 30-35mph because it will not pull from that low in 4th.

SteBrown91

2,949 posts

150 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
Eco boost all day long.

My girlfriend has a 2013/62 100bhp titanium and it’s a cracking little car. She’s had it nearly 2 years and been faultless apart from the usual ford patchy build quality.

When we were looking they were strong money for eco boosts over the 1.25 but worth it. For example she paid 7k for a 4.5 year old car with 34k on the clock from a ford main dealer. A similar aged car today would still command at least 6k from a dealer

j4r4lly

800 posts

156 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
£2K is a significant difference but the 1.0 Turbo is a superb engine.

The 1.25 is adequate, cheap to run and smooth but it's old technology and while it will be reliable and cheap to run, it won't entertain anything like the EcoBoost does.

I've driven loads of them over the last few years and still can't quite believe that a 1.0L 3-pot can sound so good, go so well and unless you absolutely rag it silly, give good refinement and economy.

The first time my wife went out in our 125ps Focus, I told her to keep an eye on what gear she was in, as it's so smooth in normal driving that it's easy to leave it in a lower gear without noticing, especially if you are used to driving a diesel. She just laughed at me, but when she came home she said she'd done exactly that and kept saying how much she liked the car.

You ought to drive one of each back to back to really appreciate the difference.

On the new Fiesta there is a little "Eco" button on the centre console. Leave it in Eco and the throttle needs more of a prod, the interior fan is limited for speed, the engine shuts down individual cylinders under light loads and the "overboost" function is disabled. It still drives absolutely fine and I leave it like that when commuting. Turn the Eco function off and the throttle is much more lively and responsive and the overboost is restored to make it feel really punchy (for a 100ps anyway). It's almost like having 2 different states of tune in one car and the new 6-speed transmission makes it a genuine motorway cruiser too. Excellent car and powertrain.

Edited by j4r4lly on Friday 1st March 14:21

blade7

11,311 posts

237 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
Earlier this year I had a brand new 125 Focus for a couple of weeks. It was fine around town and for cruising on A roads, but I needed to use the gearbox a lot to make any progress.

GTiMike

16 posts

83 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
always preferred the zetec never had any issues always been great little engine

MrGTI6

3,265 posts

151 months

Friday 1st March 2019
quotequote all
Having driven both, I would go for the 1.2 personally. Worse on paper and slower, but it's a free-revving little engine which I would expect to be far more reliable in the long term. In the real world, fuel economy is probably about the same.