Used Mercedes S Class purchase, why so worrying?
Used Mercedes S Class purchase, why so worrying?
Author
Discussion

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Sunday 4th July 2021
quotequote all
People are always saying how expensive to run an S Class is. But why? A 3.0D has the same engine as my C Class had. 3.0 diesel. Was fine to run. What is it about the posher car that goes wrong or needs so much upkeep?

georgeyboy12345

4,581 posts

63 months

Sunday 4th July 2021
quotequote all
Heavier - engine under more strain
Loads of gizmos/gadgets - loads more to go wrong and expensive to replace
Model specific parts will be more expensive

deeen

6,367 posts

273 months

Sunday 4th July 2021
quotequote all
Suspension? Plus S-class tax, if they see you coming...

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
OK, i guess that makes sense with the gadgets. The thing is though my father had a 2006 Corvette fully loaded and it did 200,000+ miles before it's first significant failure. Other than routine maintenance and the big interest in fuel of course it was a pussy cat to run. Even the air filter lasted 30,000 miles and the plugs 40,000 miles. I don't see why a car as well made as an S Class should be, needs to go wrong or need loads of looking after. Not for 20 years anyway in my book.
Does anyone know the year at which it's better to buy one after, as in when was it made much better during it's timeline? Or a year or model to avoid?

Jag_NE

3,333 posts

128 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I like the idea of buying a lightly used on of these and keeping it indefinitely. My concern is less about issues but more the risk of getting a clocked one. Loads of them are used as exec taxis these days and it’s pretty common knowledge that some of them are subjected to mileage adjustments to preserve value. As the interiors wear so well it can make it much harder to spot.

georgeyboy12345

4,581 posts

63 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I think part of the issue is your assumption that Mercedes are well made

They were in the 90s and earlier, not so much now

JimmyConwayNW

3,598 posts

153 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
Always had that pre conceived idea that S Class models were troublesome.

I am motor trade and sell used cars. Ive sold 6/7 S Class in the past 12 month. All between 3/5 year old. Had one back for an EML which turned out to be a main dealer software update.

Bloody great cars, I personally used one of them for a while and absolutely loved it. They really aren't all that bad at all.

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I had one as a courtesy car and it later sold for 18 grand. It was nigh on RR motoring for new Fiesta money.

Edited by BroadsRS6 on Tuesday 6th July 06:41

Summit_Detailing

2,419 posts

221 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
No specific year/model to avoid from my research over the years.

I've had 2, one 320cdi of 2007 vintage, the other a 2012 350d lwb - nothing significant went wrong with either during my ownership, over and above routine maintenance items. The 2012 car was an ex-chauffeur car (company I used to drive for) and I sold it with 265k on the Odo. If you covered the Odo it would have easily passed for a 60/80k example.

I will 100% have another, hopefully sooner rather than later. It will probably be a 2015/16 car, definitely in LWB SE-line trim, not AMG-line.

We seem to have an aversion to barges in this country compared to the rest of Europe for whatever reason, which is why they make a brilliant value used buy.

Cheers,

Chris

Decky_Q

2,068 posts

205 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I ran an s500 on a shoestring and it wasnt too hard. There is a mercedes specialist scrapyard about 20miles from me so got the majority of my replacements there, the suspension had 2 leaking struts which I got new from France for about 250 and most things were easily repaired. Sold it at over 200k due to it cutting out due to a problem with the instrument binnacle that I just couldn't be arsed tracing when I fancied some new metal instead.

RazerSauber

2,876 posts

88 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I can't say I've ever owned one but it's worth remembering, like with all former £100k+ cars, the car will depreciate but the repairs won't. I reckon this scares off a few people.

gman88667733

1,196 posts

95 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I think the thing to remember is, far more people will post about issues online than praise.

It is an expensive, luxury car. So repair costs will be higher when bits do go wrong. If you are prepared for the potential for wear items to need replacing, or bigger ticket items that may well cost a good chunk more than another brand of car, then you may as well give it a go!

I doubt they are any worse than comparable cars on the whole. But they are complicated, luxury cars.

ZX10R NIN

30,461 posts

153 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
BroadsRS6 said:
OK, i guess that makes sense with the gadgets. The thing is though my father had a 2006 Corvette fully loaded and it did 200,000+ miles before it's first significant failure. Other than routine maintenance and the big interest in fuel of course it was a pussy cat to run. Even the air filter lasted 30,000 miles and the plugs 40,000 miles. I don't see why a car as well made as an S Class should be, needs to go wrong or need loads of looking after. Not for 20 years anyway in my book.
Does anyone know the year at which it's better to buy one after, as in when was it made much better during it's timeline? Or a year or model to avoid?
A N/A pushrod V8 is a very different engine to a Quad Cam Turbo charged diesel now both are very capable of doing 200k+ but the 3.0d will need more regular fettling, which may well be offset by the V8's need for fuel wink

FastEdd11e

205 posts

84 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
We are seriously looking at an S Class coupe as our next family car.

The chap we are thinking of using as a sourcing agent feels they simply don't stop depreciating. "Look at the old CLS" was a thought.
I get it but after driving one, S500, we both loved it. It was a 2017

Would we buy the saloon?

Mogul

3,065 posts

251 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
I’ve just paid £73(!) for a pair of front disks (incl. delivery) for my W221 (Blueprint by Bilstein).

This seems too cheap - is there massive oversupply in the parts industry right now with relatively few miles driven in the last year etc?

Next purchase will be control arms. Not super impressed that these need changing at 90,000miles, but they are only £150 for the front pair (I’ll just need someone to fit them for me).

You can run these cars quite economically when consumable parts are this inexpensive, but there will be times when you just need a specialist and you will be at their mercy.

I recently suffered rear Airmatic collapse which looked wallet-bending but it was just the rear height sensor (tricky to access without a ramp).

My local specialist rinsed me for £300 to replace the sensor which was probably double what it should have cost in parts and labour.

It would appear that once they get beyond 6 or so years old, nobody wants to pay much/any more for an S vs the equivalent high-spec E…




Edited by Mogul on Monday 5th July 21:20

Krikkit

27,928 posts

209 months

Monday 5th July 2021
quotequote all
Mogul said:
Next purchase will be control arms. Not super impressed that these need changing at 90,000miles, but they are only £150 for the front pair (I’ll just need someone to fit them for me).
8 years and 90k miles seems like decent service for a 2+ ton car.

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Tuesday 6th July 2021
quotequote all
ZX10R NIN said:
BroadsRS6 said:
OK, i guess that makes sense with the gadgets. The thing is though my father had a 2006 Corvette fully loaded and it did 200,000+ miles before it's first significant failure. Other than routine maintenance and the big interest in fuel of course it was a pussy cat to run. Even the air filter lasted 30,000 miles and the plugs 40,000 miles. I don't see why a car as well made as an S Class should be, needs to go wrong or need loads of looking after. Not for 20 years anyway in my book.
Does anyone know the year at which it's better to buy one after, as in when was it made much better during it's timeline? Or a year or model to avoid?
A N/A pushrod V8 is a very different engine to a Quad Cam Turbo charged diesel now both are very capable of doing 200k+ but the 3.0d will need more regular fettling, which may well be offset by the V8's need for fuel wink
But why should major bills be more regular? Most people expect a Yank tank to be far more quickly and cheaply made than a Merc S Class. So if the 'vette can run and run with regular servicing why shouldn't the S Class? A Merc taxi we caught to Stansted recently had done 176,000 miles. I'd be appalled if that car had needed lots of expensive repairs when you think that Volvos and some other cars have been regularly doing huge mileages with just the odd failure here and there.

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Tuesday 6th July 2021
quotequote all
Summit_Detailing said:
I
We seem to have an aversion to barges in this country compared to the rest of Europe for whatever reason, which is why they make a brilliant value used buy.

Cheers,

Chris
Main reason is we have an overcrowded country with a fast growing population and small roads never designed for huge cars. Plus parking places and house garages that suit a Golf at best, not a big cruiser.

anonymous-user

82 months

Tuesday 6th July 2021
quotequote all
Ah, Merc parts tax! I once owned a ratty S reg A Class, I'd confidently predict that it was worth somewhere in the region of f'ck all. That didn't appear to have any bearing on the cost of parts when the (plastic) belt pulleys disintegrated. You couldn't buy the pulleys individually, you had to remortgage and purchase the entire assembly. It was many, many pounds (the local garage managed to successfully complete an adequate bodge biggrin ). The car was well into banger territory, but that didn't seem to matter. I'd imagine S Class bits are the same, but with added price silliness?

And then there's the rust of course; I've seen negelcted and unloved W220s (99 onwards?) merrily rotting away, so presumably they didn't escape the cheap steel that Merc were so fond of in the early 00s?

BroadsRS6

Original Poster:

785 posts

67 months

Tuesday 6th July 2021
quotequote all
Maybe a Jaguar XJ is a fitting alternative if someone wants a luxobarge?