Are all car review sites bogus?
Are all car review sites bogus?
Author
Discussion

richard at home

Original Poster:

333 posts

141 months

Friday 14th March 2025
quotequote all
Does anyone do genuine, honest car reviews of run of the mill family cars?

I was reading a review on What Car the other day where car X was criticized for not handling as well as car Y. Go to the review of car Y and it says the exact opposite. I know that reviews are not very objective, but I'm sus on most of the online review sites.

As many cars are based on similar or identical underpinnings, I do wonder if there is really that much difference between them.

So, who does do genuine, unbiased reviews?


GeniusOfLove

4,726 posts

35 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
I think most of them are written by clueless english lit graduates with no interest in cars but no other route into journalism re-phrasing press releases and leaning on a few lazy tropes about interior plastics. Half the time when they try to regurgitate anything technical they heard over their free lunch they get it wrong.

Almost no point in reading them at all anymore.

MikeM6

5,836 posts

125 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
Hard to tell how honest they are, I suspect the best we can do is check to see whether they do negative reviews over a spread of manufacturers, or just certain ones.

Rough101

2,981 posts

98 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
You’ll often find hero cars turn to being bottom of the heap at the next review.

They also often miss the point of some cars.

Greenbot35

212 posts

116 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
I've not bothered with them for years, if I'm interested in anything I spend time on owners forum or Facebook pages. Anything badly wrong shows up pretty quickly, wet belts, rust or structural issues things like that.

As already said the tune changes very quickly so I guess they have an incentive to say the right thing.

richard at home

Original Poster:

333 posts

141 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
Ha! Yes, pretty much confirmed what I thought!

I'll just pick a few models and go forum hunting, mind you, then you run the risk of only getting horror stories and 'new car owner denial' syndrome!

WPA

13,710 posts

137 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
Honest John is pretty good as you get real feedback from owners on faults etc

MikeM6

5,836 posts

125 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
richard at home said:
Ha! Yes, pretty much confirmed what I thought!

I'll just pick a few models and go forum hunting, mind you, then you run the risk of only getting horror stories and 'new car owner denial' syndrome!
I think it would help to have some form of unsponsored review system, which in theory should really lend itself to YouTubers borrowing owners cars and reviewing them, but that hasn't worked out as well as it could have.

Pica-Pica

16,080 posts

107 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
I have read many, rarely do they evaluate what an owner really needs to know about long-term ownership.

Baldchap

9,422 posts

115 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
MikeM6 said:
I think it would help to have some form of unsponsored review system, which in theory should really lend itself to YouTubers borrowing owners cars and reviewing them, but that hasn't worked out as well as it could have.
Problem is, if a YouTuber slags off my new model I'm not lending him my next one. And so the problem perpetuates. Unless you're Top Gear levels of fame, you can't really get away with an honest review if it's negative.

AlexNJ89

3,192 posts

102 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
I feel they're all like sheep. They all say the same thing in fear of looking dumb.

I've test driven so many cars where I expected to be blown away due to the reviews then been bitterly disappointed.

Cars like the GR Yaris and Giulia Quadrifoglio.

Mercdriver

3,000 posts

56 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
WPA said:
Honest John is pretty good as you get real feedback from owners on faults etc
Agree, always thought and sought out his opinion before buying a car

CoolHands

22,272 posts

218 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
I remember reading motorcycle reviews when I was younger annd more naive. Clearly looking back they were all absolute bks.

Now has 5 valves for more power at higher revs! Fastest bike ever!

Next year… 4 valve head for great torque! Old bike is slow!

Next year… over square bore for more power at higher revs!

Next year… greater stroke for more power in the midrange!

Following year…exhaust valve for more power at higher revs!

Etc

Complete and utter dross

Ian Geary

5,375 posts

215 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
MikeM6 said:
I think it would help to have some form of unsponsored review system, which in theory should really lend itself to YouTubers borrowing owners cars and reviewing them, but that hasn't worked out as well as it could have.
Problem is that without sponsorship, you'd have to pay for the review.

Who is going to do that in the modern day? And the point raised above that without the endorsement of the industry testers won't get invited to release events.



paddy1970

1,321 posts

132 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
You are absolutely right to be sceptical of many mainstream car reviews—especially from commercial outlets like What Car?, Auto Express, and Carbuyer—because they are often influenced by manufacturer relationships, advertising, and press events. Many reviews feel like recycled PR material, with contradictory handling assessments, vague criticisms, and a lack of real-world perspective.

Also press cars are not the same as the ones you or I would buy off the dealer forecourt. Manufacturers carefully prepare and optimise them, making traditional reviews even less reliable. For example, Porsche is known for having hand-finished press cars, sometimes even slightly tweaked engine maps...and the "journalists" are often "surprised" they are faster than the official figures ... hehe

The best way to get an honest review is to test drive the actual car you want...

thetapeworm

13,323 posts

262 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
There's always going to be good and bad as well as people that align with your own outlook more that others.

You definitely can't trust them all.

https://www.jalopnik.com/boris-johnson-was-the-wor...

7 5 7

4,189 posts

134 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
Proper car reviews died 20+ years ago, everything is the same now with a different badge on the front or insert your generic electric crossovers brand [here], nothing really different to review anymore, maybe a different thread subject tbh.

Jag_NE

3,306 posts

123 months

Saturday 15th March 2025
quotequote all
Not fully on topic I know but 20+ years ago Top Gear seemed to be massively anti Rover, Clarkson in particular. These days he is all buy British etc.

Fox-

13,532 posts

269 months

Sunday 16th March 2025
quotequote all
paddy1970 said:
The best way to get an honest review is to test drive the actual car you want...
This can be very difficult though - often the most you'll be able to get is 20 minutes which just isn't enough. Last car I bought after a 20 minute test drive I sold 3 months later.

Pickle_Rick

697 posts

83 months

Sunday 16th March 2025
quotequote all
Used to like parkers for reviews back in the day.

Topgear website is completely predictable. Every car will get an 8/10 by default. Point generally deducted if lexus or Toyota. Anything Chinese will be 5 or 6, a reluctant 7 if its a performance one. If its stupidly expensive and hideous to look at but keeps them in a job, then a 9/10, if it's a premium German SUV then a 7.

Carwow quite possibly the worst.
.