XF Sportbrake
Author
Discussion

Belle427

Original Poster:

11,546 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
I have started looking at these, Im looking at estates up to £12k and would like something toward the side of comfort but still fairly interesting.
From what I can see the options are below, all Diesels.

2.0 Avoid
2.2 Not much better but need to research them more.
3.0 V6 Possible, but horror stories of them in Land Rovers etc put me off.

Any feedback on owner experience is much appreciated.

Rob 131 Sport

4,528 posts

77 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
The XF SportBrake seems to becoming quite a sought after car and they still look good. It appears that issues with the 3.0 Diesel are due to oil dilution where cars have been trundled around town.

I would find a 3.0 Diesel with a full Jaguar/ Specialist History, low ownership and avoid too many short journeys. Whilst I own a first generation facelift 3.0 saloon, for your budget the next generation post 2015 cars are easily obtainable and dynamically they are so much better than the first generation cars.

Edited by Rob 131 Sport on Thursday 23 April 10:20

Belle427

Original Poster:

11,546 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
I am drawn toward the 3.0 but they do worry me to be honest.
What's the real world mpg on them?, I did read the 2.2 isn't particularly good in this regard.

Krikkit

27,869 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
3.0 diesel all the way - service it regularly (i.e. less than the long-life ste), don't hammer it from cold, it'll be fine.

If you're vaguely interested in servicing yourself it's an absolute doddle - you vacuum the oil out of a tube and replace the filter in the V - no need to jack it up or anything. Takes about 20 minutes.

Best of all the 3 litre S has the same electronic rear diff as the XFR, so much improved traction in winter etc.

MPG you should be able to get 40+ on a decent journey, depends how fast you want to run.

Belle427

Original Poster:

11,546 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
I do all maintenance etc myself so that bit isn't too bad.

Decky_Q

2,012 posts

202 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
BIL has a 2.2 diesel XF and loves it. He works all over UK and has clocked up 270k+ miles on his with only minor repairs and servicing.

The drivers seat shows the miles but overall still scrubs up well and even did wedding car duties for a friend last summer despite being worth about 50p it looked the part.

66HFM

821 posts

50 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
Belle427 said:
I have started looking at these, Im looking at estates up to £12k and would like something toward the side of comfort but still fairly interesting.
From what I can see the options are below, all Diesels.

2.0 Avoid
2.2 Not much better but need to research them more.
3.0 V6 Possible, but horror stories of them in Land Rovers etc put me off.

Any feedback on owner experience is much appreciated.
Why not the 2.2, as this is the same engine to have in Evoques, Discovery Sports etc, only problem is that they are Euro 5 and aren't ULEZ compliant.
I wouldn't touch the 2.0 Ingenium, also had the 3.0 in a Discovery 4 without issue.

Belle427

Original Poster:

11,546 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
66HFM said:
Belle427 said:
I have started looking at these, Im looking at estates up to £12k and would like something toward the side of comfort but still fairly interesting.
From what I can see the options are below, all Diesels.

2.0 Avoid
2.2 Not much better but need to research them more.
3.0 V6 Possible, but horror stories of them in Land Rovers etc put me off.

Any feedback on owner experience is much appreciated.
Why not the 2.2, as this is the same engine to have in Evoques, Discovery Sports etc, only problem is that they are Euro 5 and aren't ULEZ compliant.
I wouldn't touch the 2.0 Ingenium, also had the 3.0 in a Discovery 4 without issue.
No real issue with the 2.2 to be honest, just thought the V6 would be nicer.

Krikkit

27,869 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
Belle427 said:
No real issue with the 2.2 to be honest, just thought the V6 would be nicer.
V6 is a very nice engine, lots of torque and power, very smooth and quite nice-sounding. Unless you're desperate to maximise fuel economy I'd be straight onto one.


ZX10R NIN

30,213 posts

150 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
For some reason (I'm sure there's a reason as to why) the Jags don't seem to suffer with the crank issues in the same way LR/RR do there have been some but it's rare.

So I'd actually put the 3.0d back on the table.

Belle427

Original Poster:

11,546 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
I think it's due to the load they lug around all the time in LR products and the dpf is in a different position on the Jag so gets a bit hotter to aid with burning the soot off.
I'm sure I read that here.

Rob 131 Sport

4,528 posts

77 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
Belle427 said:
I think it's due to the load they lug around all the time in LR products and the dpf is in a different position on the Jag so gets a bit hotter to aid with burning the soot off.
I'm sure I read that here.
Jaguars are probably not used for the Private School / Waitrose / Gym Run and are more likely to do lengthy journeys.

si_xsi

1,304 posts

220 months

Thursday 23rd April
quotequote all
I had one, great cars but had the safety net of a 2 year approved used warranty. Oil dilution is an issue, not helped by silly 16k service intervals. Very comfortable, great looking car but spec sensitive. Some electrical issues with mine with infotainment and access control modules.

Thread here https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...