Blow-Off Valve
Author
Discussion

Lecher24

Original Poster:

197 posts

176 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Dear Nobility,

Have spent much time reading about everyone's mods and realised I should probably know a bit more about my own car!
For starters, is this BOV standard-fit for a 2006 3R? If not I have several questions...

http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/performance/dump-val...

TTFN,
Ian

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

187 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
No its not

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Lecher24 said:
Dear Nobility,

Have spent much time reading about everyone's mods and realised I should probably know a bit more about my own car!
For starters, is this BOV standard-fit for a 2006 3R? If not I have several questions...

http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/performance/dump-val...

TTFN,
Ian
No blow off valve fitted standard.

LMFAO.

hehe Demon tweaks description........."Extreme Performance And Sound" rolleyes CHAVTASTIC!!

Lecher24

Original Poster:

197 posts

176 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
In that case..
Why would it have been fitted?
What would have been fitted originally?
Does it affect performance or just noise?

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Lecher24 said:
In that case..
Why would it have been fitted?
What would have been fitted originally?
Does it affect performance or just noise?
Noble didn't deem it necessary to fit one.
In my case I fitted a forge unit along with a hard pipe kit to my M400, it made a noticable difference in flat out higher gear changes, definately less turbo stall.
fking irritating noise though, why anyone would want to amplify this with trumpets is beyond my comprehension!

Lecher24

Original Poster:

197 posts

176 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Yep, it's pretty loud. Wonder what other mods it has I didn't know about..



JulesBliss

1,149 posts

186 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
I removed my Forge one as it was leaking all the time! Didnt notice a difference with or without.

D_G

1,937 posts

238 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Mine has got a HKS SSQV, definately has less lag through the gears. It's also not too loud, just a shriek to go with the air filter noise drivingearsbiggrin

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
it puts your insurance up at least 30% because it adds so much power lol smile

snuffy

13,202 posts

313 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
JulesBliss said:
I removed my Forge one as it was leaking all the time! Didnt notice a difference with or without.
If it was leaking all the time then I suspect you had the wrong spring fitted.

Lecher24

Original Poster:

197 posts

176 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
So it is something I can take off without any issues?

D_G

1,937 posts

238 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all

Yes, no worries. The dump valve helps prevent turbo stall (which can cause premature failure) but they were made without one anyway.

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
there is a good reason they are not fitted as standard....
the turbos on a noble are way too small and boost way to low to be able to stall them significantly.. unless someone has increased boost above 3 bar it will never damage your little turbos?

of cause if you fit a massive turbo and run much higher boost then the goal posts move and you might actually need one... hence I have one but I fitted a stiff spring so it only dumps boost above .8bar hence I always have at least .8bar in the system.. it doesnt stall my huge turbo and thats more boost than a lot of people run!

the question is, how long will it take your little turbos to build back the boost into 3 meters of pipework? is it longer than the potential potential stalling of the tiny turbos?

I ran 480bhp on twin turbos without a dump valve and never had any lag on gearchange at all... it had massive lag when you wasn't on boost under full throttle as it took ages to get the turbos spinning so there was clearly no stalling at all on gearchange.

I guess you can tell Im not a fan of dump valves lol

mgbond

6,749 posts

261 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
andygtt said:
there is a good reason they are not fitted as standard....
the turbos on a noble are way too small and boost way to low to be able to stall them significantly.. unless someone has increased boost above 3 bar it will never damage your little turbos?

of cause if you fit a massive turbo and run much higher boost then the goal posts move and you might actually need one... hence I have one but I fitted a stiff spring so it only dumps boost above .8bar hence I always have at least .8bar in the system.. it doesnt stall my huge turbo and thats more boost than a lot of people run!

the question is, how long will it take your little turbos to build back the boost into 3 meters of pipework? is it longer than the potential potential stalling of the tiny turbos?

I ran 480bhp on twin turbos without a dump valve and never had any lag on gearchange at all... it had massive lag when you wasn't on boost under full throttle as it took ages to get the turbos spinning so there was clearly no stalling at all on gearchange.

I guess you can tell Im not a fan of dump valves lol
Andy, is it not the fact of stalling but the fact that it puts back pressure on the turbo and just adds stress to the bearing so having the blow off valve potentially increases turbo life?

Bondy

R0162

2,435 posts

193 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
interesting discussion..i had never really thought about it much...i had always had one fitted because i thought releasing the pressure allowed the turbos to spool up faster again...but it got me thinking what andy daid about having to build up pressure in 3m of pipework again, it kind of made sense.
So running without BOV can decrease lag??.....i think i am going to run without BOV for a while and give it a try..

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
I believe the stress would be on the shaft rather than the bearings...


mgbond

6,749 posts

261 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
andygtt said:
I believe the stress would be on the shaft rather than the bearings...
Ok,I don't know about these things but then if its not harming then is it onlt a good thing as it relives the strain.

I only put one on when I first brought mine because of this?

Bondy

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
R0162 said:
So running without BOV can decrease lag??....
yes, I had one on my high boost cossie 15 years back because it was kind of considered a must back then.... then views changed and people realised you didnt need them on turbos less than a T4 so I took it off and it was faster through the gears with no other mods.

some application definatelly need one though and on a large turbo they do work... but our turbos and thus blades are tiny.

Bondy, think of it this way, its another component to fail... if it leaks then your turbo will overspool and potentially destroy itself ... i've had this happen on my cossie, but in truth any leak in intercooler, pipework etc can also cause this... but considering the dump valve is designed to leak pressure....

whatever you do, dont fit a cheap one!

Lecher24

Original Poster:

197 posts

176 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
[quote=andygtt]

if it leaks then your turbo will overspool and potentially destroy itself ...

OK, OK, it's going!!!

Hollowpockets

5,910 posts

245 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
Andy I think your being a bit too doom and gloom here, I agree that it's less Important on our low boost cars. However when was the last time someone on here had a bov destroy a turbo or cause any damage?

There are countless people including me who use the forge one (with the right spring) and it's been faultless.

Ill be keeping mine on. smile

Graham