Rear wing on the Noble
Discussion
RacerMDR said:
Noble owners.........at what speed does the M12 rear wing create downforce?
Does anyone run the car without it?
As a road car.......does it make any difference to the rear grip to not run it? (i.e., legal ish speeds...)
HiDoes anyone run the car without it?
As a road car.......does it make any difference to the rear grip to not run it? (i.e., legal ish speeds...)
120mph (according to Lee Noble back in the day)
Yes a few, I ordered my M12 sans wing from new - looks better IMHO
IMHO, not needed on the road at all - just adds weight.
Why do you ask?
AMG Merc said:
Hi
120mph (according to Lee Noble back in the day)
Yes a few, I ordered my M12 sans wing from new - looks better IMHO
IMHO, not needed on the road at all - just adds weight.
Why do you ask?
Thanks AMG Merc 120mph (according to Lee Noble back in the day)
Yes a few, I ordered my M12 sans wing from new - looks better IMHO
IMHO, not needed on the road at all - just adds weight.
Why do you ask?
I only ask because I have always wanted the Noble since I was taken for a ride in one about 10 years ago. It's just now, at 37, for me the wing wasn't 100% to my taste. Do you have a picture of your car without it?
I'm just scanning classifieds for something to replace M3 with.
I'm getting a Disco 3 for everyday use...........and know i'll miss the M3 performance etc etc
Hollowpockets said:
TuxMan said:
According to Chris at Center Gravity 65kg of downforce at 100 mph with a 15mm gurney flap fitted raised 100mm over std .
Tux
Does that include any generated by the floor/defuser? Tux
Never understood this rear ward aero balance , the car needs more rear end grip especialy at speed so why is more aero balance a problem ?
Tux
TuxMan said:
Hollowpockets said:
TuxMan said:
According to Chris at Center Gravity 65kg of downforce at 100 mph with a 15mm gurney flap fitted raised 100mm over std .
Tux
Does that include any generated by the floor/defuser? Tux
Never understood this rear ward aero balance , the car needs more rear end grip especialy at speed so why is more aero balance a problem ?
Tux
if you want more rear downforce my wing at 5 deg develops 99kgs at 100mph and 321kgs at 180mph.
TuxMan said:
Never understood this rear ward aero balance , the car needs more rear end grip especialy at speed so why is more aero balance a problem ?
Tux
I would check that the front of your car is lower than the rear, in the wind tunnel 5mm of made a huge difference.Tux
Do you really think the back of your car is loose at speeds that the aero is going to make a difference?
Hi Adrian , everybodys car handles different , some people prefer a loose rear , me i like the back to feel planted , The car has been to Center Gravity in the last month for a full chasis setup and the angle of the car has been changed by yes you guessed it 5mm at the front !!
Car felt superb yesterday at both low and high speed although i struggled to get the correct tyre temp .
Tux
Car felt superb yesterday at both low and high speed although i struggled to get the correct tyre temp .
Tux
Gadgeroonie said:
andygtt said:
a stock car has rear biased aero in the tunnel, of cause the values are not that great so not that noticable.
if you want more rear downforce my wing at 5 deg develops 99kgs at 100mph and 321kgs at 180mph.
Andy - how did you measure that - with a strain gauge ?if you want more rear downforce my wing at 5 deg develops 99kgs at 100mph and 321kgs at 180mph.
Gassing Station | Noble | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


