Intercoolers
Author
Discussion

obes

Original Poster:

3,298 posts

267 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
hello all,

I know we've had several discussions in the past about various changes to the intercooler, fans/airflow etc. Has anyone got any 'real' results from mods yet ?

cheers, Owen.

silversix

258 posts

255 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
Funnily enough I was looking at/thinking about this last night. Couple of things I was wondering if anyone has tried:

1. larger intercooler (e.g. from Pace)
2. Water spray (my EVO had it and so do new Scoobies)
3. Water injection (this did reduce charge temps on my grp N Cossie, but only affects performance as allows more boost to be run).
4. Charge cooler. there seems to be a space crying out for one on my 400 on the oposite side to the oil cooler.
5. CryO2 (CO2 cooling) worried about the CO2 being very close to the air intake though.

Any proven fitments would be interesting to look at.

obes

Original Poster:

3,298 posts

267 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
we seem to have been through loads of ideas like those. Just wondered if anyone has actually done it.
I know PaulC has done some research, have you got anywhere with your intercooler mods Paul !?

I'm thinking of having JNM's intercooler upgrade. They seem very confident in it keeping the charge temp 10degC lower than std. At £998+VAT fitted tho I'm keen to see if that makes any real world difference!

silversix

258 posts

255 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
£1k for a new intercooler seems very steep.
the "large RS500" one I fitted to the cossie was about £350 from Pace, and that was pretty big, and had all fittings etc. If it's just the intercooler, fitting doesn't exactly look difficult. Might be worth giving them a ring, as they are very helpful.

obes

Original Poster:

3,298 posts

267 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
That is much better value. I forgot to say that the JNM price includes what they described as 'considerable adjustments' in the engine bay !!!!

>> Edited by obes on Tuesday 11th January 15:48

DanH

12,287 posts

283 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
obes said:
That is much better value. I forgot to say that the JNM price includes what they described as 'considerable adjustments' in the engine bay !!!!

>> Edited by obes on Tuesday 11th January 15:48


They'd need to a bit more than a vaguely handwavey comment to justify that cost though! If its that hard to fit, surely they've sourced a badly matched part!

paulcundy

1,897 posts

288 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
Oh no not another intercooler thread! this must be the 5th we've had.
Yes I've done all the researh. As I said in a previous posting I'm about to try out the effects of fans cos there's no other way to get air to flow over the standard M12 IC.
As soon as I have had a go I'll let you all know.

In the meantime please understand that improving the IC will not show any great change on a Dyno plot. Dyno plots are done and dusted in approx 10 seconds. As you see on the PHP video they also have bloody great fans blowing on the IC so its a very false envoirenment. If I eventualy find an IC solution I would only expect to reap the benefits after sustained use on the track. When thrashing after a while the whole engine bay including the IC reaches a thermal equilibrium that is not replicated on a dyno, not only do they have bloody great fans blowing they often have the rear clam up as well! When the whole lot is heated up thats when you start to loose power as the ECU retards the spark in response to the hot air reaching the manifold. On a Noble the ECU starts to inhibit at over 40'c. If you add boost this increases the temp even more. So the holy grail is get the air entering the manifold down to 40'c. On my car in race conditions the temp never gets below 50-55'c. If I can lower it to 40'c that should release about 20-25 BHP. As I said I'm aiming to test a solution this month and will report back but it will be as much about driving experience as it will be about absolute BHP changes.

Reading the above does this mean your car produces most power from the start when its cold and does it then progressively loose power until thermal equilibrium is reached? - yes.
Regadrs
Paul C

joust

14,622 posts

282 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
paulcundy said:
Reading the above does this mean your car produces most power from the start when its cold and does it then progressively loose power until thermal equilibrium is reached? - yes.
Old proverb say..
"Turbo cars, cold damp weather, treat little right footy carefully"...

J

DanH

12,287 posts

283 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
eh?

joust

14,622 posts

282 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
Read the other's, you'll work it out...

DanH

12,287 posts

283 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
...

paulcundy

1,897 posts

288 months

Tuesday 11th January 2005
quotequote all
Oh yes and my solution - as complex as buying a radiator fan and sticking it on the intercooler.

Regards
Paul C

cheeky_chops

1,620 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th February 2005
quotequote all
paulcundy said:
Oh yes and my solution - as complex as buying a radiator fan and sticking it on the intercooler.

Regards
Paul C


Paul, have you had any luck with this idea coming to fruition yet? I had this idea too (to fit my VXR220) and it received a luke warm reception! Maybe we are mad!!

DanH

12,287 posts

283 months

Wednesday 9th February 2005
quotequote all
cheeky_chops said:

paulcundy said:
Oh yes and my solution - as complex as buying a radiator fan and sticking it on the intercooler.

Regards
Paul C



Paul, have you had any luck with this idea coming to fruition yet? I had this idea too (to fit my VXR220) and it received a luke warm reception! Maybe we are mad!!


Nah its a good idea. A couple of pull fans on the back make good sense to me. I just reckon they need to be thermostatically controlled and mounted on a shroud for decent efficiency. Only downer is that they may further block airflow when not on, so you may find the fans on a lot.

I keep meaning to look into it, but so busy at the moment, I've barely got time to use the car let alone improve it.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

282 months

Wednesday 9th February 2005
quotequote all
My belief is a fellow pistonheader is developing the idea properly with thermostatically controlled fans. The aim is charge temps in the 40 degree range :-)

I'm sure all will be revealed when sorted.

gotapex

229 posts

261 months

Wednesday 9th February 2005
quotequote all
The stock intercooler core is something like 17.75" long, 10" high, and 2" wide. This means either putting something like a single 10-11" fan, or a pair of smaller ones. Most around this size I've seen are about 800-900 cfm. Is that what you got?

paulcundy

1,897 posts

288 months

Wednesday 9th February 2005
quotequote all
Dear All,
Be patient, I am about to test a solution, if all goes to plan we will know by the end of the month.
Regards
Paul C

DanH

12,287 posts

283 months

Thursday 10th February 2005
quotequote all
gotapex said:
The stock intercooler core is something like 17.75" long, 10" high, and 2" wide. This means either putting something like a single 10-11" fan, or a pair of smaller ones. Most around this size I've seen are about 800-900 cfm. Is that what you got?


So a pair of 8" ones would work a treat I reckon.

gotapex

229 posts

261 months

Thursday 10th February 2005
quotequote all
Most of the 8" fans have a width of 8.5" or so, which would be near perfect for coverage. However, most do just about 400-450 cfm's, giving you a total output of a single 10-11" fan.

gizard

2,266 posts

306 months

Friday 11th February 2005
quotequote all
anyone know what the upgraded fans on the radiator are then - 'cause they are rather powerful - I'm always telling the other half she can dry her hair on them after a spirted drive!!!