Sounds completely different!
Sounds completely different!
Author
Discussion

bernhund

Original Poster:

3,798 posts

222 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Went out in a friends 3r on saturday and was surprised to hear, or should I say ' not hear' much sound from his turbos. Does anyone have a brief explanation as to why my 2.5 sounds makes so much din & the 3r doesn't? No complaints, I love the sound mine makes.confused

S26VE P

2,174 posts

271 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
Are your air filters mounted behind the rear windows? My GTO-3 are mounted with the intercooler which quietens them down altho might move one forward biggrinbiggrin

bernhund

Original Poster:

3,798 posts

222 months

Monday 15th September 2008
quotequote all
yes they are, I never looked at the 3rs filters. Thats probably right. Got to say though, I love the noise mine make, especially as I blast past a bus stop and look in the miror!evil

sean_goodman

536 posts

232 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
i moved the one which feeds the front turbo forwards so as to even up the lenght of induction hoses.

hear the turbo quite nicely now

NobleGuy

7,133 posts

244 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Yeah, my upgrade included moving the air filters forward. Sounds better imo, but it might be annoying for some.

S26VE P

2,174 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
NobleGuy said:
Yeah, my upgrade included moving the air filters forward. Sounds better imo, but it might be annoying for some.
Both moved forward? was thinking of doing the nearside one myself.

NobleGuy

7,133 posts

244 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
S26VE P said:
NobleGuy said:
Yeah, my upgrade included moving the air filters forward. Sounds better imo, but it might be annoying for some.
Both moved forward? was thinking of doing the nearside one myself.
They reckoned with the air filters sitting near the intercooler the two just interfere with each other. Better cleaner air for both the filters and intercooler if they are positioned on the bulkhead near the air intakes on the top of the rear clam. If that is the case (and I can't prove it either way) then it makes me wonder why they moved the filters to the rear in the first place.

D_G

1,939 posts

238 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Mines a earlyish 3 with the filter up front...sounds great! ears

Dave

S26VE P

2,174 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
biggrinbiggrin right thats it. im off to search for pics on mounting them forward. got a few hours free this weekend. biggrinbiggrin

That was quick.biggrinbiggrin found pics here. http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edited by S26VE P on Tuesday 16th September 13:14

sjc

16,415 posts

299 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
I'm having it done on the 400 this week by Noble London, as I've still got the brackets from when I had it done on my 3R ( The buyer wanted them moved back as he thought it was too much!)The BOV can spoil some of the symphony if fitted,( my preference would be forward filters and no BOV) but its a cheap fun mod and easily reversible.Never thought of having just one moved, any reason for this?

Adrian W

15,494 posts

257 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
NobleGuy said:
S26VE P said:
NobleGuy said:
Yeah, my upgrade included moving the air filters forward. Sounds better imo, but it might be annoying for some.
Both moved forward? was thinking of doing the nearside one myself.
They reckoned with the air filters sitting near the intercooler the two just interfere with each other. Better cleaner air for both the filters and intercooler if they are positioned on the bulkhead near the air intakes on the top of the rear clam. If that is the case (and I can't prove it either way) then it makes me wonder why they moved the filters to the rear in the first place.
That might be true but moving them foreward is worse, from a performance point of view as all you are doing is placing them in some nice warm air, in the wind tunnel we saw that no air whatsoever enters through the vents behind the windows. All they do is let hot air out when the car is stationary.

They probably sound better though.

S26VE P

2,174 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
sjc said:
I'm having it done on the 400 this week by Noble London, as I've still got the brackets from when I had it done on my 3R ( The buyer wanted them moved back as he thought it was too much!)The BOV can spoil some of the symphony if fitted,( my preference would be forward filters and no BOV) but its a cheap fun mod and easily reversible.Never thought of having just one moved, any reason for this?
the reason of just one is to shorten the actual pipe length of the front turbo and leave the rear the same.

D_G

1,939 posts

238 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
That might be true but moving them foreward is worse, from a performance point of view as all you are doing is placing them in some nice warm air, in the wind tunnel we saw that no air whatsoever enters through the vents behind the windows. All they do is let hot air out when the car is stationary.

They probably sound better though.
I'd trade (just a few) horsepower for the pheeew-pheeew-pheeew in stereo on lift off.....although this winter hopefully a few more horses going in.

Dave
smile

mgbond

6,749 posts

261 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Same here, love the sound keeps that smile on my face.

Bondy

NobleGuy

7,133 posts

244 months

Wednesday 17th September 2008
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
NobleGuy said:
S26VE P said:
NobleGuy said:
Yeah, my upgrade included moving the air filters forward. Sounds better imo, but it might be annoying for some.
Both moved forward? was thinking of doing the nearside one myself.
They reckoned with the air filters sitting near the intercooler the two just interfere with each other. Better cleaner air for both the filters and intercooler if they are positioned on the bulkhead near the air intakes on the top of the rear clam. If that is the case (and I can't prove it either way) then it makes me wonder why they moved the filters to the rear in the first place.
That might be true but moving them foreward is worse, from a performance point of view as all you are doing is placing them in some nice warm air, in the wind tunnel we saw that no air whatsoever enters through the vents behind the windows. All they do is let hot air out when the car is stationary.

They probably sound better though.
Hmmm. Interesting though.

Do you mean the small meshed vents that sit on top of the clam above the engine or the oval shaped openings on the top of the rear clam nearer to the doors (difficult to describe them, sorry hehe).

Adrian W

15,494 posts

257 months

Wednesday 17th September 2008
quotequote all
The ones near the doors, the ones on top act as chimneys

sjc

16,415 posts

299 months

Thursday 18th September 2008
quotequote all
Bugga, realised mine has an upgraded oil breather( apparentky a sensible mod) fitted exactly where the nearside filter was going to be repositioned, so no Darth Vader noises for me.frown

NobleGuy

7,133 posts

244 months

Friday 19th September 2008
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
The ones near the doors....
Maybe I could add some ears to the clam to encourage the air to come in.

ears

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Saturday 20th September 2008
quotequote all
NobleGuy said:
Adrian W said:
The ones near the doors....
Maybe I could add some ears to the clam to encourage the air to come in.

ears
better to fully panel them in so once the clam is closed the air filters will suck the air in through the vent.

Hot air will kill performance... when I was in france the under clam heat was increadable.

S26VE P

2,174 posts

271 months

Sunday 21st September 2008
quotequote all
did a quick move of the nearside filter today to see if i prefer the noise. silly well think i will make some brackets and move BOTH. biggrinbiggrin sounds great.