How much HP is enough?
How much HP is enough?
Author
Discussion

JLSELAN

Original Poster:

405 posts

262 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
In case you have missed the latest in the U.S. horsepower "war":
http://www.nobleforums.com/showthread.php?t=5168

(Note: all values are measured at the rear wheels--add at least 15% for a flywheel estimate.)



Edited by JLSELAN on Thursday 23 April 01:18

Gadgeroonie

5,362 posts

265 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
i suspect that is too much power in the lower gears, but this can be limited with an ecu that has the ability to reduce boost against road speed

i like the idea of the single turbo conversion, cheaper than two turbo's and can be mounted at the rear to help with heat build up

( i reckon that number is closer to 550 atw - not trying to start a fight )

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
I'm sure a single turbo will be great for numbers, but I can't see it adding to the drivability smile Don't all the Supra dyno queens go that route?

The GTC development car had a single turbo, but it was small and Noble only targeted 300bhp with it. Whether that engine actually ever ran is another whole story.

Mike Tuckwood

1,261 posts

228 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
Nice numbers, that's what we like to see. smile That's extremely Laggy though, what Turbo's are being used?
Also, I'd be inclined to agree with Gadg, As it's a Dynojet, we'd suggest just into the 600's (Flywheel) On a Dyno Dynamics. (IMHO)
Why do we suggest that I hear you ask?

We've seen a couple of EVO's in the states recently run on both Dynojet then DD roads one after the other.

Evo 1........ Dynojet RR 501 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 386 ATW
Evo 2........ Dynojet RR 820 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 620 ATW


Both runs occurring on the same day between the 2 respective different Dyno's.


Mike.


YellowShed

587 posts

312 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
ThatPhilBrettGuy said:
Whether that engine actually ever ran is another whole story.
Phil, you should know better than that. We had an engine running on our dyno during the development phase. Couldn't get the turbo to run off one bank and provide the boost for the whole engine, so we ended up feeding a bigger one from both banks. It ran in the car for a few days before being shown at the show, IIRC. Then Lee knocked it on the head based on the response from the show...

Later, we found the rods slightly squidged (S-shaped!! eek ) - but then they were the standard items. So probably a good call at that point.

YellowShed

Duke Thrust

1,680 posts

268 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
Mike Tuckwood said:
Nice numbers, that's what we like to see. smile That's extremely Laggy though, what Turbo's are being used?
Also, I'd be inclined to agree with Gadg, As it's a Dynojet, we'd suggest just into the 600's (Flywheel) On a Dyno Dynamics. (IMHO)
Why do we suggest that I hear you ask?

We've seen a couple of EVO's in the states recently run on both Dynojet then DD roads one after the other.

Evo 1........ Dynojet RR 501 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 386 ATW
Evo 2........ Dynojet RR 820 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 620 ATW


Both runs occurring on the same day between the 2 respective different Dyno's.


Mike.
Very similar percentage difference, interesting stuff!


ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Thursday 23rd April 2009
quotequote all
YellowShed said:
ThatPhilBrettGuy said:
Whether that engine actually ever ran is another whole story.
Phil, you should know better than that. We had an engine running on our dyno during the development phase. Couldn't get the turbo to run off one bank and provide the boost for the whole engine, so we ended up feeding a bigger one from both banks. It ran in the car for a few days before being shown at the show, IIRC. Then Lee knocked it on the head based on the response from the show...

Later, we found the rods slightly squidged (S-shaped!! eek ) - but then they were the standard items. So probably a good call at that point.

YellowShed
Ah, cheers for that. I got the impression that it was pushed around and didn't actually run.

It was a nice looking thing. Shame it never got built. I heard that the only car ended up in small pieces after someone got really bored with the whole project and attacked it with a jigsaw.

M12 GTC
M12 3T
M14

frown

Gadgeroonie

5,362 posts

265 months

Friday 24th April 2009
quotequote all
Mike Tuckwood said:
Nice numbers, that's what we like to see. smile That's extremely Laggy though, what Turbo's are being used?
Also, I'd be inclined to agree with Gadg, As it's a Dynojet, we'd suggest just into the 600's (Flywheel) On a Dyno Dynamics. (IMHO)
Why do we suggest that I hear you ask?

We've seen a couple of EVO's in the states recently run on both Dynojet then DD roads one after the other.

Evo 1........ Dynojet RR 501 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 386 ATW
Evo 2........ Dynojet RR 820 ATW. Dyno Dynamics RR 620 ATW


Both runs occurring on the same day between the 2 respective different Dyno's.


Mike.
crkey a 30% over read lol, i reckon the owner was interfering with the dyno settings ! nono

Mike Tuckwood

1,261 posts

228 months

Friday 24th April 2009
quotequote all
Well, I doubt the Dynojet operator, or Dynojet would concede their figues as an "over-read" . whistle


Mike. smile