Impending higher UK import taxes on Chinese-made cars?
Impending higher UK import taxes on Chinese-made cars?
Author
Discussion

samoht

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

176 months

At present cars imported into the UK from China pay the standard 10% import tariff, the same as cars from Japan, Korea or anywhere else outside Europe.

Conversely, the same Chinese-built car imported into an EU country is charged a variable extra tariff; so for example a Polestar 2 sold across the channel pays 19.3% + 10% import taxes, for a total of nearly 30%.

However as the EU continues to raise domestic subsidies and import taxes against the threat of China, they are now threatening to lock the UK out unless we align with their tariffs - specifically to match their import taxes on Chinese EVs.

FT said:
Brussels has warned Andy Burnham that Britain would need to raise tariffs on Chinese cars and align more closely with EU trade policy if it wants to avoid “made in Europe” barriers that would hit key exports.
https://www.ft.com/content/5453be91-7bd9-4097-9e83...

Autocar said:
According to a report in the Financial Times, the UK has been told by the EU that it must apply the additional tariffs, which rise to 45% depending on the car maker; and in return the EU is prepared to treat Nissan, Range Rover and Bentley EVs as ‘Made in Europe’ under the proposed Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA), which is designed to better protect European industry from hyper-competitive Chinese alternatives.
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/business-corpor... (£)

Autocar said:
Chinese firms are able to sell higher levels of EVs in the UK than in the EU, because the UK hasn't applied the same ‘countervailing’ import tariffs on EVs built in China.
The UK may need to change its position on that for the EU to agree for its inclusion in the proposed ‘Made in Europe’ regulation changes, which would favour cars built within the bloc.
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/nissan...

Now it's always possible that the UK government may refuse, or some other deal may be done. And if import tariffs are imposed, there will probably be some notice and opportunity to buy a car already 'in the pipeline'. But if you are thinking of ordering a car to spec with some lead time, well, you might be better off moving sooner rather than later.

There's also the question of imports of Chinese ICE and hybrid cars, which have risen in Europe in response to EV-specific import tariffs; it wouldn't be a surprise to see the EU extend taxes to these, otherwise they have the double whammy of going backwards on both trade and the environment.

sherman

15,245 posts

245 months

Chery are looking to borrow Line 1 of Sunderland from Nissan to produce UK built cars. Ptobably to bypass all of this.

Nissan and Chery International UK to study manufacturing Chery International UK passenger vehicles at Sunderland Plant https://share.google/GCdpsOWUtWNgEDOL4

davek_964

11,300 posts

205 months

Chinese cars do seem to be ramping up very fast - you can see why the EU car makers are worried.

There is a local SOR supercar dealer near here in a large showroom. I drove past it on Wednesday and noticed that it's now a small SOR supercar showroom - and a large Chery showroom.

Mikebentley

8,625 posts

170 months

Could the Chinese not just reduce the price of their cars to allow for the raised tariffs? A Geely EX5 is £31k to £39k in the UK and about £10k in China. I feel they have some margin to play with.

Sway

35,137 posts

224 months

Whilst I agree the trade practices of China need to be challenged - it is a VERY odd scenario for a trading partner to require you to place tariffs on a third nation for your exports from them...

LRDefender

800 posts

38 months

Surely if the U.K. gov introduce punitive taxes on Chinese cars then it's the hard working, cash strapped British consumer that foots the bill. As a capitalist society don't we want competition?

hidetheelephants

35,912 posts

223 months

Is re-export from the UK to the EU a significant trade? If there are boat-loads of LHD stuff arriving here and immediately going to Rotterdam then maybe they have a point.

Sway

35,137 posts

224 months

hidetheelephants said:
Is re-export from the UK to the EU a significant trade? If there are boat-loads of LHD stuff arriving here and immediately going to Rotterdam then maybe they have a point.
Can't circumvent the tariffs applied - the Country of Origin will remain as China even if shipped from UK to EU.

Jader1973

5,144 posts

230 months

The UK has a slight problem in that it is a RHD market in a LHD region.

If the Chinese continue to dump product in the UK to gain market share at what point do the established European manufacturers decide it isn’t worth engineering and tooling a RHD car because their is no return on investment?

Then all you’ll be able to buy is Chinese stuff. Which is China’s plan mind you.

vaud

59,573 posts

185 months

Yesterday (09:23)
quotequote all
LRDefender said:
Surely if the U.K. gov introduce punitive taxes on Chinese cars then it's the hard working, cash strapped British consumer that foots the bill. As a capitalist society don't we want competition?
I understand your point. However there are some products from China that are being sold below cost price to displace the EU manufacturers.

I know of a European tools company that, like all companies, buys a sample of a rival new product and tears it down to work out the costs to build, etc

One recent Chinese product - it was a robot lawnmower - when they took it apart, one key part cost as much as the device was being sold for…

I’m all for competition but when your competitor has state backing and state funding to undercut and remove the competition - that’s not really capitalism…

vaud

59,573 posts

185 months

Yesterday (09:24)
quotequote all
Oh and that’s before we get into IP theft.

Exystenshalist

40 posts

34 months

Yesterday (10:11)
quotequote all
vaud said:
LRDefender said:
Surely if the U.K. gov introduce punitive taxes on Chinese cars then it's the hard working, cash strapped British consumer that foots the bill. As a capitalist society don't we want competition?
I understand your point. However there are some products from China that are being sold below cost price to displace the EU manufacturers.

I know of a European tools company that, like all companies, buys a sample of a rival new product and tears it down to work out the costs to build, etc

One recent Chinese product - it was a robot lawnmower - when they took it apart, one key part cost as much as the device was being sold for

I m all for competition but when your competitor has state backing and state funding to undercut and remove the competition - that s not really capitalism
I am sceptical about such claims. In my experience (lived and worked in China for over a decade, set up multiple businesses there), China is the most capitalist place imaginable. Competition between firms in China is incredibly fierce. All governments make bets on and support industries they deem to be strategically important, but I think that the narrative of Chinese state funding and backing is significantly overblown by parties with a vested interest in demonising China.

vaud

59,573 posts

185 months

Yesterday (10:24)
quotequote all
Exystenshalist said:
I am sceptical about such claims. In my experience (lived and worked in China for over a decade, set up multiple businesses there), China is the most capitalist place imaginable. Competition between firms in China is incredibly fierce. All governments make bets on and support industries they deem to be strategically important, but I think that the narrative of Chinese state funding and backing is significantly overblown by parties with a vested interest in demonising China.
I don't believe that it is rampant, but I can believe the Chinese state would do it in focused sectors to gain market share/remove competition in a short-medium term basis.

I know the company involved in this example and they are one of the most ethical, quality vendors that I know.

One issue with China (aside from IP theft, which is still rampant and unchecked, and is not demonising China), is the rules.

For example, if you sell covered goods in the European Union, you generally must supply spare parts for 5 to 10 years after the product leaves the market, depending on the specific product category.

How do you enforce that if China says "sorry, no"?

Sway

35,137 posts

224 months

Yesterday (10:30)
quotequote all
vaud said:
Exystenshalist said:
I am sceptical about such claims. In my experience (lived and worked in China for over a decade, set up multiple businesses there), China is the most capitalist place imaginable. Competition between firms in China is incredibly fierce. All governments make bets on and support industries they deem to be strategically important, but I think that the narrative of Chinese state funding and backing is significantly overblown by parties with a vested interest in demonising China.
I don't believe that it is rampant, but I can believe the Chinese state would do it in focused sectors to gain market share/remove competition in a short-medium term basis.

I know the company involved in this example and they are one of the most ethical, quality vendors that I know.

One issue with China (aside from IP theft, which is still rampant and unchecked, and is not demonising China), is the rules.

For example, if you sell covered goods in the European Union, you generally must supply spare parts for 5 to 10 years after the product leaves the market, depending on the specific product category.

How do you enforce that if China says "sorry, no"?
Great post.

You're absolutely right - there's certain emerging industries where the state has made damned sure Chinese businesses capture the market share. EVs are a good example, things like robot mowers and vacuums another. And so on.

That's compounded by the Western manufacturers having 'manufacturing tech debt', so it's not a case of springing up from scratch, but absorbing the costs of the pivot. A double whammy.

Clad-Hach

941 posts

18 months

Yesterday (10:31)
quotequote all
Quelle surprise the UK is appeasing China, Super Embassy planning approved, the spy case disappeared, only 10% charged on imported China made cars...EU up to 45%, US 100%.

Its about time we started to look after our interests...if anyone wants to sell goods here its under our rules, sadly we have had spineless Governments past and present that don't think that way.

bergclimber34

4,127 posts

23 months

Yesterday (11:14)
quotequote all
I see no issue with Chinese cars.

They were very early to adopt EV tech as they have proved hopelessly poor at making their own ICE engines, so why not.

I would not be shocked in my life time to see several brands we currently think of as European or American being owned entirely by Chinese firms, or people like VAG, or Stellantis will sell certain brands to them to fund their dying breaths in the car industry

They are coming, they are here in huge numbers already, you cannot fail to see the huge rise in Chinese brands on our roads in a very short timeframe. and it is because they are cheap, we are lazy and easily conned, and most of them are on lease deals so it doesn't really matter if they go wrong.

If you give your ability to buy a car to someone else, they will buy Chinese every time, not everyone gives a toss about what car they drive.

They go say "oh it looks like a Range Rover for half the price durrrr"

Mikebentley

8,625 posts

170 months

Yesterday (17:23)
quotequote all
bergclimber34 said:
I see no issue with Chinese cars.

They were very early to adopt EV tech as they have proved hopelessly poor at making their own ICE engines, so why not.

I would not be shocked in my life time to see several brands we currently think of as European or American being owned entirely by Chinese firms, or people like VAG, or Stellantis will sell certain brands to them to fund their dying breaths in the car industry

They are coming, they are here in huge numbers already, you cannot fail to see the huge rise in Chinese brands on our roads in a very short timeframe. and it is because they are cheap, we are lazy and easily conned, and most of them are on lease deals so it doesn't really matter if they go wrong.

If you give your ability to buy a car to someone else, they will buy Chinese every time, not everyone gives a toss about what car they drive.

They go say "oh it looks like a Range Rover for half the price durrrr"
Geely already heavily invested in major European brands. Lots of shared build examples Chery building JLR stuff in China under licence see the Freelander 8


Screenwash

388 posts

52 months

Yesterday (23:27)
quotequote all
Well it sounds like the sort of coercive trick the EU would play on an aspiring trading partner. And the UK government will probably cave in and gratefully accept the extra income raised by the higher tariffs. Screw the consumer.

It’s all too late now, the Chinese are here to stay. And as Joe Public becomes increasingly impoverished it’s all they/we can afford…