500kg's is when the magic starts happening...?
500kg's is when the magic starts happening...?
Author
Discussion

bonesX

Original Poster:

902 posts

201 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Few yrs back at an Anglesey TD a BEC owner said its not until you get down to 500 the magic starts.... Is this really true?

qdos

825 posts

231 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
It's all about power to weight ratios.

I've got vehicles well under 500kg and also a bit above too.

Personally I'd say that the max power to weight ratio that's handleable without a computer taking over is around the 400bhp per tonne range.

I've had as much fun with low powered lightweight cars as I've had with heavier far more powerful ones. And indeed can confirm this Friday just gone much fun was had at Abingdon with everything from Hillman Imps through to Porsches and M3s on the circuit there. It all depends on what you call magic really, for me it was seeing an Imp on 3 wheels catching up again after passing him on the straights as we went through the chicanes. Brilliant! :-)

jeffw

845 posts

249 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
qdos said:
Personally I'd say that the max power to weight ratio that's handleable without a computer taking over is around the 400bhp per tonne range.
Not sure I agree with that statement. It has more to do with the way the power is presented....My Phoenix has 340BHP in 620Kg nd is perfectly drivable but it has a Rotrex Supercharger and not a Turbo which makes all the difference.

Huff

3,366 posts

212 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
It's not just power to weight, it's the sheer joy of low weight for it's own sake: the virtuous circle that things can be made lighter because loads are lower and so forth and the whole 'single-minded' driving experience benefits. No ARBs, more compliant spring/ride rates, tiny central/low-mounted engine/gearbox mass and so on.

Since the OP is specifically asking about BECs - yes, I'd agree. If you want the full fun a bike engine offers, seems silly to save 50KG on the engine choice only to saddle the lot with another a minimum 100KG+ of ballast. Put another way, at 600Kg and above (ballpark) there's questionable benefit in picking a bike engine over the right car engine - which can be made to make more power, or a broader spread lower down the rev range making it very tractable on-raod, which the heavier gearbox will accept long term and so on.

My Fury R1 is 427kG fully fuelled at last geo (422 on the SVA) and an utter delight in terms of wieldiness. My best upgrade in three years of owner ship over last Sept - April has been to swap back to a motorbike battery removing an excess 9kg there - and dropping 25Kg off me. I'd love to say it's 500Kgs for the car with me in it, but we're within 1.3% biggrin

Anyway that exercise amounts to half an adult passenger, and if I add it back as temporary ballast it's noticable redface

On teh power front - well there are faster cars out there but I don't remotely care - that's not entirely what such things are about.

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Huff - any more details on your car? Which model R1? What rear axle?

Classic looks; R1 Powerplsnt - what more does a man need?

bonesX

Original Poster:

902 posts

201 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
It's not purely BEC's - it's just the chap who said that had a BEC, that's all.

He told me he had owned an Elise S1, but it wasn't until he got 'down to 500' (with his R1 BEC) that the magic started...

I too have owned an S1 and a BEC (ZX10R) weighing 523Kg's, but in another recent thread saw a comment about the Seven design's aerodynamics being the biggest factor in deceleration, so this thread is somewhat half way to confirm something I became unsure about

However, I am looking to get back into a kit car and like the look of the Fury, but its weight, albeit only in the 600+kg area for a car engined one, is slightly concerning me

PaulKemp

979 posts

166 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Do not obsess over one persons throw away line
You may disregard a perfectly good car
And in any case the true all up weight will be more than 500Kg unless you buy a car that is 400Kg
Tank of gas 25 to 35Kg driver 75Kg

mnrvortxf20c

430 posts

169 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
i think my fury fireblade weighs in at 420kgs with 919 blade motor. cant believe how light the honda units are! i also run a tiny bike battery and have the lightweight race body,foam filled bag seat,alloy everything and freelander quaife lsd

Huff

3,366 posts

212 months

Monday 24th June 2013
quotequote all
Tim - it's IRS with a Ford 3.38 ring gear/ Quaife ATB. Pic in profile.

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
Huff said:
Tim - it's IRS with a Ford 3.38 ring gear/ Quaife ATB. Pic in profile.
Yes, I saw that. It looks great.
This:

plus this:

should yield something vaguely similar - albeit Live axle.

rdodger

1,088 posts

224 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
Tim.C said:
Yes, I saw that. It looks great.
This:

plus this:

should yield something vaguely similar - albeit Live axle.
What car is that? More pics?

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
rdodger said:
What car is that? More pics?
It's an Autotune Gemini - at least that's how it started; see www.farcester.com

rdodger

1,088 posts

224 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
Tim.C said:
It's an Autotune Gemini - at least that's how it started; see www.farcester.com
Ah of course! Have I seen some build pics on Locost?

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
rdodger said:
Ah of course! Have I seen some build pics on Locost?
Potentially a few, yes.

rdodger

1,088 posts

224 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
Tim.C said:
Potentially a few, yes.
Just had a look at your build. It looks fantastic, great attention to detail. It will be a shame to race it.

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
rdodger said:
Just had a look at your build. It looks fantastic, great attention to detail. It will be a shame to race it.
That's very kind - thank you. I have to say that there have been several occasions where I've said "Ah, it's only a racecar" - the bodywork mould lines are a good example. Otherwise I'd never finish it.

I'm giving serious thought to IVA. I've considered it with hose runs, brake lines etc.


Martyn-123

654 posts

206 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
Not as light as some others on here but here's mine.

It's a factory built lightweight version, panels very thin and front end kevlar (very high tech in 1985 when it was made). Originally owned by John Eales (Rover engine builder) who used it as a sprint car for it's first 10 years before it was road registered.

Currently sporting a 5.0v8 and recently weighed in at 820kgs,


Martyn....
P.S. I do find it amusing when mainstream manufacturers announce a lightweight version of their car and you read through all their advertising and can't find the overall weight listed.



Restoration story on www.marcosmantula.com


Edited by Martyn-123 on Thursday 27th June 18:53

rdodger

1,088 posts

224 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
Tim.C said:
That's very kind - thank you. I have to say that there have been several occasions where I've said "Ah, it's only a racecar" - the bodywork mould lines are a good example. Otherwise I'd never finish it.

I'm giving serious thought to IVA. I've considered it with hose runs, brake lines etc.
I know what you mean. I have just completed my build. IVA on Monday. I started out building it for trackdays mainly but always with the intention of IVA. After I got the chassis and ally panels powder coated it all changed and I drove myself mad getting things "just so". Painting things only I will ever see, getting brake pipe clips I liked the look of. Who ever new you could spend days choosing the right kind of machine screw head for fixing panels and trim?

I think I have gone mad!

trackerjack

649 posts

205 months

Thursday 27th June 2013
quotequote all
An Autotune Gemini aaaaah that was my first kit car, I built it in the 90,s using a Dolomite sprint lump so no lightweight but I loved the car till I had an accident in it that was my fault.
At that time there was an Gemini being raced successfully with a Rover 3.5 V8 and owner driver was a Bill Batty I recall and what a strange coincidence my daughter invited me down to Brands a couple of weeks ago to take me round in her class winning Boxster and what a surprise to see Mr Batty,s Gemini there now owned by a couple of older guys who just use it for fun. I had been taken for a few laps round Castle Combe in the late 90,s in it and can vouch for its wicked turn of speed.

Your car will no doubt be brilliant fun.

Tim.C

342 posts

218 months

Friday 28th June 2013
quotequote all
We're a bit O/T here but what the hell.
Richard, Anthony and Carolyn @ Autotune have been quite good at giving me an idea of the Gemini's competition history so I know all about Bill's V8 and Clive's V6 cars -

Quite a lot of my chassis is made from 18swg rather than 16swg so less than 500kgs is definately 'on'. How close it gets to the 440kgs that would get me to minimum weight remains to be seen.