Westfield v8 or 2 ltr zetec
Westfield v8 or 2 ltr zetec
Author
Discussion

grayxr

Original Poster:

12 posts

232 months

Sunday 1st April 2007
quotequote all
After some advice ,just sold an old GTM and now looking for a westfield.I really like the v8 but will I be able to live with it.Want somthing to travel to Nurburg ring in May.
How much is road tax for a year, I get different answers on the price ,what would it do to the gallon on a run, insurance ,what are the bad points?the one I have seen is a 4.0 with fuel injection, low milage,02 Plate for £14995.
Against the 2 litre zetec would there be much difference in performance?
Please help
Thanks

molestrangler

976 posts

231 months

Sunday 1st April 2007
quotequote all
Try the Westfield club, very helpfull and friendly bunch. I have driven the Toyota twincam version and the Fireblade and were both fun, but very diferent, would not want to drive the Megablade on a long run , but fun on a track or the twisty bits. If you go for a standard Rover V8 there's not much power difference to be had, just torque, unless you tune of course.
I think it's really down to what you are going to use it for, if you intend doing much mileage then perhaps the V8 might be a little "juicy" but, it has to be said that although it might have interesting traits, the V8 still does feel and sound a bit special.

www.wscc.co.uk

grayxr

Original Poster:

12 posts

232 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
Cheers will try the club

rushv8

99 posts

263 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
I run a 4.6ltr carb'd V8 Dax Rush ( 300BHP / 280ft/lbs torque), so here's my 10 penneth :
V8 is great for cuising and easy to live with around town, and gives masses of instant torque / power across a big rev band - 1200 - 5500 rpm . Sound great and gives good smooth power band : great for powering out of corners or up hill. Only downside is 20-25mpg on a run, and ~ 7 - 10 mpg on a sprint track or hillclimb - but they are seriously quick!!!

If 02 plated then I guess the car you're looking at would be £185/year road tax, and is too old to fall into the new "chelsea tractor" band G road tax bracket courtesy of Gordon Brown.

I'd go V8 every time, or bike engined if performance and economy are the main aims, but having been in a zetec injected Dax Rush also, there's nothing wrong with performance of them (save for a peaky power curve and not much better mpg than V8 and the mono sound-track).

Whatever you do - do go for a 7 type car, they're just awesome with a good motor in them.

v8owner

602 posts

259 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
rushv8 said:
I run a 4.6ltr carb'd V8 Dax Rush ( 300BHP / 280ft/lbs torque), so here's my 10 penneth :
V8 is great for cuising and easy to live with around town, and gives masses of instant torque / power across a big rev band - 1200 - 5500 rpm . Sound great and gives good smooth power band : great for powering out of corners or up hill. Only downside is 20-25mpg on a run, and ~ 7 - 10 mpg on a sprint track or hillclimb - but they are seriously quick!!!

If 02 plated then I guess the car you're looking at would be £185/year road tax, and is too old to fall into the new "chelsea tractor" band G road tax bracket courtesy of Gordon Brown.

I'd go V8 every time, or bike engined if performance and economy are the main aims, but having been in a zetec injected Dax Rush also, there's nothing wrong with performance of them (save for a peaky power curve and not much better mpg than V8 and the mono sound-track).

Whatever you do - do go for a 7 type car, they're just awesome with a good motor in them.


What he said...!

BoRED S2upid

20,983 posts

264 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
[quote=rushv8] but having been in a zetec injected Dax Rush also, there's nothing wrong with performance of them (save for a peaky power curve and not much better mpg than V8 and the mono sound-track).

quote]


If thats true its got to be the V8 every time hasn't it? The sound and power from such a light weight car must be awesome.

dern

14,055 posts

303 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
Justin S had a 2.0 zetec westfield (contact him through his profile) and it was excellent. I had a 4.6 v8 and it was also excellent. Your best bet would be to test drive each and see what you like.

I'd go for a v8 given the choice of the two as the power was immense. My fuel consumption was 15mpg but I was on a big webber carb, FI would have been much better.

grayxr

Original Poster:

12 posts

232 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for all help,I really want to go the whole hog and get a v8 and I think you have made my mind up,just need to check insurance costs.

Martin Keene

11,098 posts

249 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
A mate of mine, mid 30's and live's in Liverpool, has just insured a £15k Seight for £375. And thats considered expensive, if you live in a decent area, with a good record, and your not 20, it shouldn't cost more than £300.

phild

178 posts

252 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
I have a 2.0 Zetec on Webers and find it has plenty of performance - with the side exhaust it is plenty loud enough and it pops and bangs quite happily. One of the big differences between a V8 and Zetec has to be affordability. My 2003 2.0 Zetec cost me £6250 last autumn. It is also going to be a whole lot easier to work on, there is plenty of room under the bonnet and plenty of upgrades to keep your wallet busy.

Anyway - get over to the Westfield club boardroom

Cheers

Phil

devout gooner

206 posts

234 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
phild said:
I have a 2.0 Zetec on Webers and find it has plenty of performance - with the side exhaust it is plenty loud enough and it pops and bangs quite happily. One of the big differences between a V8 and Zetec has to be affordability. My 2003 2.0 Zetec cost me £6250 last autumn. It is also going to be a whole lot easier to work on, there is plenty of room under the bonnet and plenty of upgrades to keep your wallet busy.

Anyway - get over to the Westfield club boardroom

Cheers

Phil

The initial cost of a V8 I agree will be more but you wont need to "keep your wallet busy" with upgrades, as you have all the power you need right from day one .In addition, a yank V8 is bullet proof and will outlast two zetecs fitted with a load of stuff they weren`t designed for . And as for that throaty stereo soundtrack - Priceless.

custardtart

1,746 posts

277 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
A decent set up 2.0l zetec will easily give 190bhp which is at least as much as a standard Rover V8 and it'll be cheaper to tune it to 250bhp than the V8 and it'll run real smooth and with the huge weight difference of the engine and gearbox it'll leave a V8 of equivalent power for dead especially under braking and round the bends!

It won't have such a great sound but is sooo much sweeter an experience IMHO

dern

14,055 posts

303 months

Monday 2nd April 2007
quotequote all
custardtart said:
A decent set up 2.0l zetec will easily give 190bhp which is at least as much as a standard Rover V8 and it'll be cheaper to tune it to 250bhp than the V8 and it'll run real smooth and with the huge weight difference of the engine and gearbox it'll leave a V8 of equivalent power for dead especially under braking and round the bends!
Not in my experience.

Get a 4.6 and get John Eales to take it to 300bhp. Mine had 238lbft at idle and 303lbft at 3000rpm. You know it makes sense

v8owner

602 posts

259 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
custardtart said:
V8 of equivalent power for dead especially under braking and round the bends!


Mine niether...
At a recent goodwood trackday My rush trounced another driver and his 2.0 Westfeild, and made every corner.. whereas the Westfield didnt..

v8 jago

982 posts

277 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
custardtart said:
A decent set up 2.0l zetec will easily give 190bhp which is at least as much as a standard Rover V8 and it'll be cheaper to tune it to 250bhp than the V8 and it'll run real smooth and with the huge weight difference of the engine and gearbox it'll leave a V8 of equivalent power for dead especially under braking and round the bends!

It won't have such a great sound but is sooo much sweeter an experience IMHO


confused confused
I dont know how expensive people think rover v8`s are to modify, but i think they are very reasonably priced. zetec performance parts must be given away for free if they are cheaper to tune than a rover v8. Also rovers are very light so the power to weight is good also. A 3.9ltr with a 238 cam, webber 500, hi- rise inlet, ported heads and headman header manifolds. The noise alone will out do any 4cyl engine, Then the power/weight or the rover will be far ahead in my eyes.. Everyone does have there own opinion though... If it is to go into something special then power it by something special, If it is going to be a run of the mill everyday driver and your average shopping car then go the other route !!!

Roman

2,033 posts

243 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
How much less does a Zetec weigh than an RV8?

I doubt it is much as a Pinto or DOHC weigh about the same as an RV8.

I would expect a 4cyl car to be much cheaper to buy though and '90s 4cyl Westies seem to be very reasonably priced.

As well as Dax (my personal favourite '7') Tornado & Formula 27 also produce(d) V8 cars.

rushv8

99 posts

263 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
dern said:
Justin S had a 2.0 zetec westfield (contact him through his profile) and it was excellent. I had a 4.6 v8 and it was also excellent. Your best bet would be to test drive each and see what you like.

I'd go for a v8 given the choice of the two as the power was immense. My fuel consumption was 15mpg but I was on a big webber carb, FI would have been much better.



Dern - I have probably same Webber Eddlebrock performer 500 carb that you did , and I get 20-25 mpg with normal mix of "hooning" / cruising : they are an art to jet properly, and very sensitive to fuel pressure / flow metering from your pump - 15mpg suggests not rolling road tuned or you have a heavier right foot than me !!! (not easy I can tell you).

Roman

2,033 posts

243 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
This looks very nice indeed:

www.pistonheads.com/sales/151806.htm




dern

14,055 posts

303 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
rushv8 said:
dern said:
Justin S had a 2.0 zetec westfield (contact him through his profile) and it was excellent. I had a 4.6 v8 and it was also excellent. Your best bet would be to test drive each and see what you like.

I'd go for a v8 given the choice of the two as the power was immense. My fuel consumption was 15mpg but I was on a big webber carb, FI would have been much better.



Dern - I have probably same Webber Eddlebrock performer 500 carb that you did , and I get 20-25 mpg with normal mix of "hooning" / cruising : they are an art to jet properly, and very sensitive to fuel pressure / flow metering from your pump - 15mpg suggests not rolling road tuned or you have a heavier right foot than me !!! (not easy I can tell you).
It went to a new owner so I'm afraid I'll never know. Liked the car, didn't like the gearbox.

grayxr

Original Poster:

12 posts

232 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for all info,still love the idear of a v8 but in the end it all comes down to cash ! had a insurance quote of £360, not bad as I have no no-claims .
What is the difference between a type a type 9 grarbox and a mt75 gearbox?