what denotes a kit car?
what denotes a kit car?
Author
Discussion

DaFuggy

Original Poster:

6 posts

225 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
i heared that if you put the ferrari 355 body kit on a toyota MR2 its insurance then changes to a kit car!

but if you just add a body kit bonnit rear fin change the insides and mod the engine its still classed as an MR2? i dont understand the difference other that making it look like a car its not. but that does not even seem right as i love the k1 attack but thats a kit car and look like nothing else!

please can some one help?

AdamW

775 posts

264 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
The Attack could never be considered anything but a kit car because that's exactly what it is, with a purpose made chassis and donor components. Not all kit cars are replicas.

I see your point with the MR2 debate though. I suppose the difference between a modified MR2 and a Ferrari replica is that the former would still be generally recognised as a Toyota, whereas the latter is something quite different (if only to look at). It's also more of an involved 'build' than just changing, say, the bonnet and sills on an MR2.

Bit of a vague answer, that. It's definitely a grey area.

Edited by AdamW on Friday 10th August 10:27

DaFuggy

Original Poster:

6 posts

225 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
but shorly some of the kitted cars that apear in some of the car shows are not always easy to spot what they are! but as i say i have an MR2 i would like to customize.

i also have a 3000GT that i wanna change to carbon bonit boot wings and doors. i know this wont get into the kit car ins.

but wanna run both cars but ins for the import MR2 is silly money but if its can get classed as a kit car i would be happy. (dont wanna have it looking like a ferrari no offence ment in this but were it can look like one it will never sound or go like one.. so what is the point?) lol

Jonty99

4,423 posts

237 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
I was thinking about this the other day, I have a Veranti that is basically the same idea as the Ferrari replicas but its not a replica. Its basically had all the body panels changed, and the roof chopped off. The log book says its still an MR2 because of the lack of change to the chassis, it didn't have to be SVA'd, but yet I insure the car as a Veranti, which saved me £1200 on insurance than if I'd have insured it as a modified MR2. Another thing also is that you can modify the engine on your car as a Kit Car and it doesn't really make any differnce.

Have you tried insuring it as a kit car even though its an MR2, and just say its a ferrari replica, but without the badges, and without the usual kit? Not sure what would happen in this case?

FlossyThePig

4,138 posts

267 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
DVLA said:
Kit Cars
Where all the parts of a vehicle are supplied new by the manufacturer...

Kit Conversions
This is where a kit of new parts is added to an existing vehicle or old parts are added to a kit comprising a manufactured body, chassis or monocoque bodyshell. The general appearance of the vehicle will change and result in a revised description on the registration certificate...

DaFuggy

Original Poster:

6 posts

225 months

Friday 10th August 2007
quotequote all
so providing i change it and change what it says on the reg doc's (once the body work is changed. to sumat like "versil wide arched slashed bonit" or dafuggy mk1 lmao i sould then get kit car ins on it?!

DaFuggy

Original Poster:

6 posts

225 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
DVLA says....

The vehicle must score eight or more points to retain the original registration mark. If less than eight points are scored or a second-hand or modified chassis or altered monocoque bodyshell is used, an enhanced single vehicle approval (ESVA), single vehicle approval (SVA) or motorcycle single vehicle approval (MSVA) certificate will be required to register the vehicle. A 'Q' prefix registration number will be allocated.


The following values will be allocated to the major components used:

chassis or body shell (body and chassis as one unit - monocoque ie direct replacement from the manufacturer) (original or new) = 5 points
suspension = 2 points
axles = 2 points
transmission = 2 points
steering assembly = 2 points
engine = 1 point
Where there is evidence that two vehicles have been welded together to form one (ie 'cut and shut') a 'Q' mark will be allocated. ESVA, SVA or MSVA will be required.

tiger_drew

229 posts

247 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
in your case you are not modifying the chassis or using a manufacturers chassis

I dont know if the rules have changed but when i had my Spartan, which was basically a rebodied Triumph herald it retained the original chassis so kept the original plate but was classed as a kitcar.

try this link it may help

http://www.madabout-kitcars.com/kitcar/artspartan....

DaFuggy

Original Poster:

6 posts

225 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
now i am confused??..

so i can get a new set of body pannels to make it look like sumat else? or custom?

providing the LVLA are happy with the body change its a kit car....
that sounds more like the ferrari kit for the mr2... its just a body kit but its bolt on body pannels!

andy_quantum

13,204 posts

228 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
My own tally system involves the following

- Smells of glue
- Leaks, either water or fluids
- Breaks down
- Is always 90% finished
- Cant be insured by Direct Line
- Was once another car or cars

There are more criteria, but thats all I can muster right now biggrin

RazMan

394 posts

260 months

Monday 13th August 2007
quotequote all
As long as your modified car still has the original chassis it will always remain the same model (MR2 for example) on the V5. If you make major changes to the chassis or drivechain then you enter the grey area of the kit car and I am fairly sure you will be required to get it through the SVA test and you really don't want to go there - believe me.

If you want to make a unique car then you can either rebody an existing model (but not a replica please biggrin) but why not go a little further and build one of the many wonderful designs available out there? The Murtaya looks fairly straightforward to build, using one donor and has very lively performance with all wheel drive. It also doesn't look like a kit car. You could even check out my car - it started out as a kit but ended up as something else!

d3vine

699 posts

292 months

Tuesday 14th August 2007
quotequote all
So is an Ultima a kit car? Everyone seems to refer them as kit cars. Ultima Sports refer their cars as self assembly super cars...

tiger_drew

229 posts

247 months

Wednesday 15th August 2007
quotequote all
d3vine, That is merely semantics (phrasology)it uses a manufacturers chassis and a kit of parts therefore a kitcar

RazMan

394 posts

260 months

Wednesday 15th August 2007
quotequote all
self assembly, kit car, component car - some super, some fairly crappy.
Its all the same really and just different shades of grey.