GTM LIBRA withdrawn from production
GTM LIBRA withdrawn from production
Author
Discussion

fuoriserie

Original Poster:

4,560 posts

293 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
I just read that the GTM Libra was withdrawn from production due to the demise of new Rover parts.

What a shame for a very good kitcar, but was just wondering if it would have been too expensive to re-engineer with a different powerplant ?







singlecoil

35,805 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
fuoriserie said:
I just read that the GTM Libra was withdrawn from production due to the demise of new Rover parts.

What a shame for a very good kitcar, but was just wondering if it would have been too expensive to re-engineer with a different powerplant ?
That's a shame. Do you have a link?

fuoriserie

Original Poster:

4,560 posts

293 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
fuoriserie said:
I just read that the GTM Libra was withdrawn from production due to the demise of new Rover parts.

What a shame for a very good kitcar, but was just wondering if it would have been too expensive to re-engineer with a different powerplant ?
That's a shame. Do you have a link?
just read it on this issue:

http://www.completekitcar.co.uk/Issue/march2010.ht...

singlecoil

35,805 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
Sounds to me like Potenza aren't trying very hard. I don't know exactly what parts they feel they need to be able to buy new from Rover, but there are always ways around such snags. Would need some re-engineering of course, but I shouldn't think that need involve the actual monocoque bodyshell.

Ferg

15,242 posts

281 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
fuoriserie said:
I just read that the GTM Libra was withdrawn from production due to the demise of new Rover parts.
Does everybody WANT to use new parts??
Sounds like an excuse to me.
Does the parts supply problem mean you aren't able to wash the bloody demonstrator before putting it on the stand at the biggest showcase of the year???
Pity someone who understands kitcars didn't buy it.
Hey-ho.

spaximus

4,364 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
When I was speaking with a guy I know well at Westfield the biggest issue they were having was scourcing the LHD metro rack they were using. When they could get them they were £750 each!!

There was a plan to redesign the car to use the bits from the Westfield front & rear suspension but maybe that was put on hold due to the lack of sales they were having.

The other issue was cost, the demonstrator they had with the Honda engine was knocking on £30k which is big bucks, hence the need to reduce the overall cost by sharing the running gear.

It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.

singlecoil

35,805 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
spaximus said:
The other issue was cost, the demonstrator they had with the Honda engine was knocking on £30k which is big bucks, hence the need to reduce the overall cost by sharing the running gear.

It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.
I think this is a particular problem in the kit car market. As the product gets better, more sophisticated and offers accommodation and comfort in line with production cars, so its price inevitably increases. If you are offering something that goes well beyond the performance of production cars, in the way Ultima do, then price isn't really too much of a problem. But when it's only the equivalent, then it is.


ezakimak

1,871 posts

260 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
Meridian motorsports in Moorabbin in Melbourne has a couple of demonstrators (coupe and convertible versions) as they had the local rights to distribute these cars or did a couple of years back. I believe that they were built using locally sourced components. Can’t remember the engine think it might have been the Eunos 300ex v6 that they had in it.
It has been done.

I can’t believe that the rack is a huge issue. There are so many front/rear steer racks available that it would just be a matter of working out one with a suitable pinion angle and shortening or lengthen it to suit.

thescamper

920 posts

250 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
Think the lack / cost of Rover parts may be a smoke screen. The monocoque is bloody expensive to produce.

fuoriserie

Original Poster:

4,560 posts

293 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
I wonder if re-engineering the Libra with a spaceframe chassis and separate body would make it cheaper to manufacture and still keep the car in production ? would it be worth it?

Maybe the should sell the project to someone that could focus more time on a unique product...as I still think the car has a niche market in the current and future kitcar industry.





Edited by fuoriserie on Thursday 11th March 08:21

Chris71

21,548 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
spaximus said:
It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.
That could be a point. I'd definitely say the Libra had more charisma than a Boxster, but the basic layout, performance etc. were all pretty comparable. While I'd take a Libra over a Boxster any day they're also very similar in price to an S1 Elise and that would be a far harder decision. The Elise also has a slightly leftfield appeal, not dissimilar to a kit, so it might just be too close.

The Libra was a fantastic, quality kit and I hope it returns, but it is possible it got a little close to the low-volume end of the ready built market (I can't quite bring myself to describe the likes of Lotus as mass produced!)

Ozzie Dave

574 posts

272 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
Its always surprised me, many of the parts can be purchased as OEM from China and suchlike, westfield and suchlike could easily search and purchase specialist parts that way, it just takes some work. (NB this is what I do for the IT industry, I've even just had my latest device manufactured from scratch for a fraction of what it would cost here in OZ)

yazza54

20,238 posts

205 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
I certainly don't find getting hold of rover parts such a struggle, and the parts aren't particularly expensive. I think it's more to do with the actual kit itself, as a rolling car... most of it is bespoke and the tub takes a long time to make which can't be cost effective. I've got to admit if they spaceframed it and started reproducing them, I wouldn't see it as a proper Libra. Infact it would loose it's appeal in some respects for me because it would be less innovative than the original.

Then again I could go round saying I'VE GOT A PROPER ONE tongue outbiggrin


I'd like to see it continue in production, but keeping the monocoque...maybe with some updated styling. As for engine options, I think the Libra is pretty versatile anyway, go honda or toyota instead.


To be honest I don't see GTM as GTM anymore, lets face it, whatever gets built...whether a modified Libra copy, or a new type of GTM, it'll still be a Westfield. As much as I dont want to say it, GTM of old is pretty dead and I don't think anyone will come along and do it better than it was done before. Let's just hope someone who knows what they're doing comes along and takes hold of it, either that or westfield get their arses in gear!

Edited by yazza54 on Thursday 11th March 15:41

rdodger

1,089 posts

227 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
spaximus said:
When I was speaking with a guy I know well at Westfield the biggest issue they were having was scourcing the LHD metro rack they were using. When they could get them they were £750 each!!

There was a plan to redesign the car to use the bits from the Westfield front & rear suspension but maybe that was put on hold due to the lack of sales they were having.

The other issue was cost, the demonstrator they had with the Honda engine was knocking on £30k which is big bucks, hence the need to reduce the overall cost by sharing the running gear.

It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.
Rimmer Bros list the MGF LHD manual rack at £324 inc vat. There is an exchange surcharge of £176 inc vat but still ONLY? £500. I would have thought it would be an easy part to swop. The LHD Metro rack is also available at less than £200 inc vat.

Ferg

15,242 posts

281 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
spaximus said:
It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.
Chris71 said:
...... S1 Elise and that would be a far harder decision. The Elise also has a slightly leftfield appeal, not dissimilar to a kit, so it might just be too close.
Some people are clearly on the wrong forum.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

279 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
Some people are clearly on the wrong forum.
Because they would consider buying an Elise instead of a Libra?

Ferg

15,242 posts

281 months

Thursday 11th March 2010
quotequote all
Absolutely.

You can't buy an Elise in kit form so you miss out on an enormous chunk of the benefit of owning one.
Kitcars are for BUILDING.

spaximus

4,364 posts

277 months

Friday 12th March 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
Absolutely.

You can't buy an Elise in kit form so you miss out on an enormous chunk of the benefit of owning one.
Kitcars are for BUILDING.
I get the building bit as a builder of several cars, however the point that I made was not how good the car is/was, as it is excellant, to others it is just another car. Now given the similar price point to a Boxster, or an Elise there are far more who would choose those over the GTM.
I wanted my wife to have one but when I was looking the kit was IIRC about £14k plus engine etc, in the end she preferred a new MGTF which came with hardtop abs etc etc for about £4k more, without having to wait for me to build it, a built example from GTM was much more expensive.

It is sad that it has been stopped production and it would be great if it was sold on.

Chris71

21,548 posts

266 months

Friday 12th March 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
spaximus said:
It is sad as it is/was a cracking car but when a boxster secondhand is in the same leauge, not many would chose a handbuilt car.
Chris71 said:
...... S1 Elise and that would be a far harder decision. The Elise also has a slightly leftfield appeal, not dissimilar to a kit, so it might just be too close.
Some people are clearly on the wrong forum.
Why? I believe a good kit can stand up on its own merrits, not simply due to loyalty to the kit car industry. The Libra is a great car, but so is the Elise and I don't think it's doing the GTM any diservice to say it's a logical competitor to one of the greatest sports cars of the last two decades.

My other point was that buying a Lotus is - I would imagine - hardly like rocking up to your local dealership and getting a new MX5 or Boxster. It's still an individual low-volume sports car with its own character and foibles.

singlecoil

35,805 posts

270 months

Friday 12th March 2010
quotequote all
Many many years ago I built a kit car. The reasons for building a kit then were

1) The fun, achievement etc of the build
2) Getting a performance level that would have cost a lot more buying any ready made option new or second hand
3) Being able to use the good mechanical bits from a rusty car I already owned

Add those reasons up and buying a kit was a really good option for me. These days reason 1 is still there, but the other two have disappeared, fast cars can be bought quite cheaply, and cars just don't rust the way they used to. So that does have a bearing on the kit car market, and manufacturers really do need to have the mix of price and perceived value just right, and it would seem that that isn't possible with the GTM anymore.