Texas up the creek
Author
Discussion

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

234 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/formula_one/157500...

Work halted on the track as Bernie hasn't awarded the race contract yet... are we seeing another Donnington and BCE not giving a flying because he now has Jersey?

sirtyro

1,824 posts

227 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
I saw this as well....not impressed with how BE is treating them. Watched the video of DC going around the track and the circuit map they have actually looks like it could be a really good circuit! Hope it works out for them.....to be honest I'd rather have a good circuit in Austin then another street circuit in NY that might just end up being another valencia!

MonkeyHanger

9,267 posts

271 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/formula_one/157500...

Work halted on the track as Bernie hasn't awarded the race contract yet... are we seeing another Donnington and BCE not giving a flying because he now has Jersey?
I never expected it to be ready with or without a contract. Donington MK2 was always on the cards.

SirTainly

904 posts

240 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
We are seeing the little toad at his finest, he strung along the guys in Texas simply to up the ante in NY. Now he has milked the guys in NY, he's going to drop Texas as they are no longer useful to him.


Streps

2,457 posts

195 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Bernie now has his race in new Jersey... he now is quite ready to screw Texas over.
Some poor bugger actually trusted him.

DanDC5

19,992 posts

196 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Not like F1's reputation is already terrible in the US anyway.....

P-Jay

11,400 posts

220 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
He really is an arse isn't he!

It's a risky move too, as in the other thread about Austin, F1 doesn't need the US per se, but it does if it wants to grow, the US on the other hand doesn't need F1 at all, as with most things sporting the US likes it's own sports, and no one will argue that the yanks are a patriotic bunch, and won't like being dicked about by the poison toad.

StevieBee

15,285 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
There is a flipside to the bd Bernie line. That is, you have to question the judgement of an organisation that commits to a major construction project without a signed contract in place, particularly in the US, the most litigious society on earth.

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

208 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
I thought there was a contract with the promo company but not with the track? and the promo company and track where having arguments. (probably instigated by Bernie)

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
There is a flipside to the bd Bernie line. That is, you have to question the judgement of an organisation that commits to a major construction project without a signed contract in place, particularly in the US, the most litigious society on earth.
It does seem odd but Bernie's machinations are so complex and devious, maybe they genuinely thought they really did have a contract. As I said on the "other thread" on this same topic (why two?), you could have the most cast-iron contract this side of the Andromeda Galaxy and Bernie would still toss it in the bin if he thought it was the right thing to do.

What's more, he would show that it was all your fault and that you would have to pay him to release yourself properly from the deal.

norman156

2,097 posts

225 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
MonkeyHanger said:
hornetrider said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/formula_one/157500...

Work halted on the track as Bernie hasn't awarded the race contract yet... are we seeing another Donnington and BCE not giving a flying because he now has Jersey?
I never expected it to be ready with or without a contract. Donington MK2 was always on the cards.
I suppose at least this time a perfectly good track isn't being massacred in the process

pw32

1,032 posts

227 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It does seem odd but Bernie's machinations are so complex and devious, maybe they genuinely thought they really did have a contract. As I said on the "other thread" on this same topic (why two?), you could have the most cast-iron contract this side of the Andromeda Galaxy and Bernie would still toss it in the bin if he thought it was the right thing to do.

What's more, he would show that it was all your fault and that you would have to pay him to release yourself properly from the deal.
You are probably very right on this. I can't believe they don't have a contract. Either that or they are very very stupid. The paddock must of thought they had a contract or RBR wouldn't of gone and driven on it a few weeks back for promotion.

Nicholas Blair

4,111 posts

313 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Who paid for the Red Bull car to be flown out there and DC take it round?

Probably small change to BE if he arranged it all. rolleyes

StevieBee

15,285 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
pw32 said:
Eric Mc said:
It does seem odd but Bernie's machinations are so complex and devious, maybe they genuinely thought they really did have a contract. As I said on the "other thread" on this same topic (why two?), you could have the most cast-iron contract this side of the Andromeda Galaxy and Bernie would still toss it in the bin if he thought it was the right thing to do.

What's more, he would show that it was all your fault and that you would have to pay him to release yourself properly from the deal.
You are probably very right on this. I can't believe they don't have a contract. Either that or they are very very stupid. The paddock must of thought they had a contract or RBR wouldn't of gone and driven on it a few weeks back for promotion.
When does "Complex and Devious" become "Clever and Effective" ? Another debate on another thread perhaps.

This just all seems odd really. Nobody knows what the deal was. One would assume from what we know, that Bernie said you can have a contract on these terms if you do, x,y,z.... Austin have claimed to have fulfilled their obligations but clearly haven't as Bernie says the opposite. Nobody really knows anything!

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Bernie will argue black is white as and when it suits him. By now, EVERYBODY should be SO wise to his ways. I am amazed that anyone wants to deal with him anymore as his main "business" skill seems to be stitching everybody else up for his own benefit.

Mini1275

11,098 posts

211 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Formula 1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone says he is ready to axe the Austin Grand Prix in the wake of internal disputes between the race organisers.

Ecclestone had intimated in India that the race was at risk, but the situation reached a critical point this week when circuit construction was halted amidst a growing row between the event promoters and the track's organisers.

"We've done everything we bloody well can to make this race happen," Ecclestone told the Press Association. When asked whether the race was in danger of being dropped, he replied: "Yes, it will be for sure, 100 per cent."

Ecclestone said that his original contract, with Tavo Hellmund's Full Throttle Productions company - who owned the rights to host the race - had been cancelled recently.

He said he had instead started negotiations with the track developers, the Circuit of The Americas, who halted construction work on Tuesday after claiming contract talks had not progressed as previously agreed.

Ecclestone says he is yet to receive a guarantee of payment from COTA, and has given them three weeks to resolve the situation or risk having the race dropped from the 2012 Formula 1 calendar when the World Motor Sport Council meets in New Delhi on December 7.

"We had an agreement with Full Throttle Productions," Ecclestone explained. "Everything was signed and sealed, but we kept putting things off like the dates, various letters of credit and things that should have been sent, but nothing ever happened.

"Then these other people (COTA) came on the scene, saying that they wanted to do things, but that they had problems with Tavo [Hellmund]. They said they had the circuit, and that they wanted an agreement with me.

"I told them they had to sort out the contract with Tavo, which they said they would. But that has gone away now because we've cancelled Tavo's contract as he was in breach.

"We've waited six months for him to remedy the breach. He knows full well why we've cancelled. He's happy. But these other people haven't got a contract. All we've asked them to do is get us a letter of credit.

"We are looking for security for money they are going to have to pay us. That is via a letter of credit, normally from a bank. If people don't have the money they find it difficult to get the letter of credit, and so we don't issue a contract."

The dispute means F1's current four-year absence from the US, a key market, could be further prolonged, although a deal to race in New Jersey from 2013 was recently agreed.


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96270

pw32

1,032 posts

227 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Yes, just read the autosport article. He comes out of it well, doesn't he always....... so the cota build a track for a promoter who has a contract with bernie. Recipe for disaster. He really is Mr Teflon.

bananaman1

455 posts

226 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Good work by bernie .getmecoat

skwdenyer

18,707 posts

269 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
On this particular issue, I don't see where the hate for Bernie comes from.

Promoter signs a contract with Bernie; said contract says promoter will pay $25m (or provide letter of credit for same) by end of July 2011. Promoter doesn't stump up the cash. Promoter contracts with circuit owners; promoter falls out with circuit owners. Bernie terminates promoter's contract after waiting several months for overdue payment / LoC, and offers contract to circuit directly - something circuit has asked for. Circuit has to find $25m (or LoC); circuit doesn't provide.

You might not like the payment terms, but if the promoter signed the contract and defaulted surely it is the promoter's fault? Bernie's point is that, if they can't stump up the sanction fee, they're insufficiently solvent to be on the calendar for 2012 as they might not make it to race day. In this he may have a point.

Chrisgr31

14,275 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Hmm although isn't the original promoter of the Austin race a long standing friend/associate of Bernie? Therefore is it possible it was all done on purpose to get New Jersey or New York involved?