NIMBYs get their comeuppance
Discussion
http://www.newmarketjournal.co.uk/news/crime-and-c...
A couple buy a house 500 metres from a speedway stadium and decide to try and get the place shut down due to the noise blighting their lives.
A couple buy a house 500 metres from a speedway stadium and decide to try and get the place shut down due to the noise blighting their lives.
the article said:
But in a decision with far-reaching implications for land use, three judges ruled the stadium and track, both of which have planning permission, are “an established part of the character of the locality” and, despite the noise, did not amount to a “nuisance” in law.
They now have a legal bill into the hundreds of thousands which I suspect will blight their lives somewhat more than a speedway track and serves them right. It's about time some common sense was shown in matters like this and I hope it can be used as a legal precedent the next time some idiots move next door to a racetrack and are surprised by the noise.Good result...
And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75

And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
mybrainhurts said:
Good result...
And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
That's bulls
And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
tRobb F said:
mybrainhurts said:
Good result...
And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
That's bulls
And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?
http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
tignoring the complain itself, how can people be stupid enough to:
1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then b
h on about how their house is worth less
1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then b
h on about how their house is worth less Scuffers said:
ignoring the complain itself, how can people be stupid enough to:
1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then b
h on about how their house is worth less
Half the population has a below average IQ.1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then b
h on about how their house is worth less Life Saab Itch said:
What a wonderful precedent.
That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.
Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
the bloke who caused all the trouble at Croft (in-law of the owners, bought house at the track, then complained) has moved now, but the original judgement still standsThat should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.
Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
Life Saab Itch said:
What a wonderful precedent.
That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.
Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
Indeed, will be interesting to see whether they make any public comment about this one. That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.
Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
Hugo a Gogo said:
the bloke who caused all the trouble at Croft (in-law of the owners, bought house at the track, then complained) has moved now, but the original judgement still stands
Was Croft (and Combe, for that matter) actually a court case? I'm pretty sure Combe would have been a council decision. That would be subject to Judicial Review, and we now know what the judges think.CBR JGWRR said:
How on earth do you buy a house next to a speedway and not notice?
You cant, Im sure they did know and its was just a try on, that has failed to epic proportions.I do hope the likes of croft can go for judicial review. Croft was an odd one as it centred round a divorce IIRC
davepoth said:
Was Croft (and Combe, for that matter) actually a court case? I'm pretty sure Combe would have been a council decision. That would be subject to Judicial Review, and we now know what the judges think.
Yes the council issued a noise nuisance order, which was campaigned for by a small number of NIMBYs who don't actually live in Castle Combe, they're from the village I live in. The noise isn't really that bad. I'm on the Parish Council and sadly there are 2 or 3 members who have a serious dislike for the circuit. Howard doesn't do himself any favours though. The circuit has a number of different types of planning permission with various numbers of days permitted per year, based on the number of cars on track at any one time. Japfest, which causes queues from the circuit back up to the M4 (approx 8 miles) and is their biggest annual event, is termed as a "dealer day" which, whilst fitting with the relevant number of cars on track, is hardly in the spirit of things and understandably causes consternation.
The circuit has permission to operate somewhere around 240 days of the year, and in the last decade has never run more than 180 days but I bet the local morons don't realise this.
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




