Discussion
Composite Guru said:
That's a bit mad, isn't it? I wonder if they left the old F-Duct pipe in the chassis "just in case"?http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98035
As reported by llewop on another thread
Charlie seems to think its ok
God I hope this dosent go to court after the teams protest .....
As reported by llewop on another thread
Charlie seems to think its ok
God I hope this dosent go to court after the teams protest .....
Gaz. said:
Composite Guru said:
I've onyl read a small part of Scarbs FWFD piece but I get the gist.Bloody clever these F1 designers aren't they!

Any news of any teams protesting yet ?
Or will they have to wait to see if there is an 'unfair' advantage before they can protest
Just imagine all the home bases of the teams charging around like mad trying to work out if they can engineer one on to their package and what advantage they will gain.....
ETA.....and the red hot phones to the teams legal bods .......



Edited by Rugbyman on Thursday 15th March 15:16
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98037
this seems to suggest the thought process is more 'how quick can we copy it' than 'ban it'
Although I'm also confused by it as it seems to me that Autosport and Scarbs are describing different things - rear f-duct (Autosport) front-wing f-duct (scarbs)!
BTW - I keep writing 'f-duck' by mistake!
this seems to suggest the thought process is more 'how quick can we copy it' than 'ban it'
Although I'm also confused by it as it seems to me that Autosport and Scarbs are describing different things - rear f-duct (Autosport) front-wing f-duct (scarbs)!
BTW - I keep writing 'f-duck' by mistake!

llewop said:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98037
this seems to suggest the thought process is more 'how quick can we copy it' than 'ban it'
Although I'm also confused by it as it seems to me that Autosport and Scarbs are describing different things - rear f-duct (Autosport) front-wing f-duct (scarbs)!
BTW - I keep writing 'f-duck' by mistake!
It's kind of both a widget in the rear wing is 'opened' when DRS is enabled that re-directs the 'air' back down to the front of the car to also stall the front wing... double less drag = more speed...;ast year it led to an unstable car, as the F-Duct operated at certain wind speed not when the DRS button was pushed....this year maybe they've cracked it...?this seems to suggest the thought process is more 'how quick can we copy it' than 'ban it'
Although I'm also confused by it as it seems to me that Autosport and Scarbs are describing different things - rear f-duct (Autosport) front-wing f-duct (scarbs)!
BTW - I keep writing 'f-duck' by mistake!

Agoogy said:
Can you imagine the scale of the task for the other teams having to retro-engineer a path for this 'air' to get from the rear to the front...and no-one is sure whether it is useful yet...
Maybe not, but I can see Red Bull making use of that "driver cooling" slot in the RB8's "duckbill" for the rear wing...I'd hazard a guess that they were hedging their bets by opening that up...Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


