Mercedes to quit F1?
Author
Discussion

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Article said:
Team Mercedes is "on the verge" of quitting Formula 1, at least according to an article by F1 correspondent Kevin Eason.

In an article published by the London newspaper The Times, Eason claims that rival teams Ferrari, McLaren and Red Bull will get to appoint directors once F1 is floated on the Singapore exchange. Mercedes, however, has not been extended the same offer.

F1 chief executive Bernie Ecclestone said: "Why should Mercedes have the same deal as the others? What have they done in F1? They won a race and that is it."

Based on Ecclestone's attitude, Eason argues that Mercedes is "on the verge of quitting F1", having reportedly conducted a study into how the team could be withdrawn.

Eason also quoted Ecclestone as having "scoffed" at the suggestion that if Mercedes left the sport F1's stock could lose 20% in its value.
Source: http://www.wheels24.co.za/FormulaOne/Mercedes-to-q...

Your thoughts?
I don't think I believe it quite frankly.

Streps

2,457 posts

195 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
"What have they done for F1"

Bit of selective memory blanking there ...
Only supplying engines for top teams such as Mclaren for over 10 years winning numerous world championships.
Mercedes were the 2009 champions under brawn... it's the same team.

Drivers such as Lewis Hamilton,Mika Hakkinen,David Coulthard,Paul Diresta,Micheal Schumacher and Jenson button all owe a bit to mercedes and their collaborative projects for their F1 success.

Does Bernie think we are stupid?

Edited by Streps on Monday 7th May 19:07

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Streps said:
Does Bernie think we are stupid?
Most definitely.

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
I just read what Bernie has said re Mercedes. What a tt the man is. Wouldn't say that Mercedes have 'won a race' & leave at that.

They have won many races with their engines & Bernie is, as always, talking out of his arae.

Grow up Bernie you knob. You can't just have a championship featuring only Ferraris even though we all know that is what you want.

Arsewipe.

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
I just read what Bernie has said re Mercedes. What a tt the man is. Wouldn't say that Mercedes have 'won a race' & leave at that.

They have won many races with their engines & Bernie is, as always, talking out of his arae.

Grow up Bernie you knob. You can't just have a championship featuring only Ferraris even though we all know that is what you want.

Arsewipe.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
and you believe the reports?

you don't think this could be their way of negotiating?

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
and you believe the reports?

you don't think this could be their way of negotiating?
It's certainly Bernie's way of negotiating. I was taught that the opening position determines the closing position. Right now Mercedes have fk all, and they'll end up with some minor concessions. If they'd started at a bit, Mercedes wouldn't have settled until they were at parity with Ferrari et al.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
So this is a "news" report based on one person's opinion?

m8rky

2,090 posts

188 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
I am getting to the point of thinking the sooner F1 disappears up its own ahole the better.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

207 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
EDLT said:
So this is a "news" report based on one person's opinion?
Don't mind that report. If it's true, it's only true in part - if at all. Bernie, taking on the might of Daimler Benz, yeah right. I don't see Bernie winning that easy. Anyway, I reckon F1 needs M-B more than M-B needing F1.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
I just read the opposite of everything Bernie says. Thus Mercedes are getting the best deal out of the lot of them.

Big German name with lots of investment, one legendary driver, lots of engines supplied. Sounds right.

Crafty_

14,063 posts

229 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
They wont get better than Ferrari does, no-one ever does.

Its just a bit of posturing, always the same. No one is making a bit noise about lotus - doesn't seem they are getting a look in and have been around in various forms forever. What about Williams ?


williamp

20,381 posts

302 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
what about williams indeed. One of the most successful teams- in terms of stats, better then red bull...

woof

8,456 posts

306 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Streps said:
"What have they done for F1"

Bit of selective memory blanking there ...
Only supplying engines for top teams such as Mclaren for over 10 years winning numerous world championships.
Mercedes were the 2009 champions under brawn... it's the same team.

Drivers such as Lewis Hamilton,Mika Hakkinen,David Coulthard,Paul Diresta,Micheal Schumacher and Jenson button all owe a bit to mercedes and their collaborative projects for their F1 success.

Does Bernie think we are stupid?

Edited by Streps on Monday 7th May 19:07
Well not to pick bones - The engine was never an mercedes - it's an Ilmor engine and a company built by the late Paul Morgan & Mario Illien and the engines are still built in Brixworth Northamps - not that Mercedes would what you to know that. In fact the only german element of Mercedes F1 is the all important money !


DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
My naive POV (I know it's Bernies MO to divide the teams and then conquer):

You either give place for a director to each and every team, or to none at all.

Anything else is just going to generate yet more tedious off the track wranglings, accusations, paranoia and politics which, frankly, are destroying the sport from the inside already.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

207 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
woof said:
Well not to pick bones - The engine was never an mercedes - it's an Ilmor engine and a company built by the late Paul Morgan & Mario Illien and the engines are still built in Brixworth Northamps - not that Mercedes would what you to know that. In fact the only german element of Mercedes F1 is the all important money !

Wires crossed here. From what I understand since 2002 M-B owns the orignal Ilmor company and in 2005 a new Ilmor Eng was set up by Morgan & Illien.


Chrisgr31

14,275 posts

284 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Personally I am not convinced that Ferrari is essential to F1. If Ferrari were to leave would F1 be destroyed? I dont think so. The same applies to any individual team.

What becomes an issue is whether any departing team takes others with them to form a competing series, if Ferrari were to depart to form a seperate series I can see that being an issue.

I know that the teams are competitive but I really cannot understand why they cannot stick together to negotiate with Bernie, unless theres something that goes on behind the scenes that we dont know about. All the teams could walk together and set up a new series. Even all the teams less Ferrari could do it, after all we have seen from HRT, Caterham, and Virgin/Marussi that its not easy to bring new teams in. So Williams, McLaren, Renault, Mercedes leaving on masse and creating a new series would be a serious blow.

DJRC

23,563 posts

265 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
Its certainly an unusual spat and the hidden messages in this one are especially murky.

I would hesitate to suggest that Bernie has had his ear tugged by a few established members and been told that they absolutely dont want Merc getting their feet under the table.

Im struggling to see a realistic or profitable opening on any other angle. Im sure there is another angle at work, there always is when Bernie is around, but this one is a bit too opaque for me.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
DrTre said:
My naive POV (I know it's Bernies MO to divide the teams and then conquer):

You either give place for a director to each and every team, or to none at all.

Anything else is just going to generate yet more tedious off the track wranglings, accusations, paranoia and politics which, frankly, are destroying the sport from the inside already.
having 12+ different directors just to cover the teams would be totally un-workable (just as FOTA has demonstrated)

if the teams had any sence, they would make FOTA work and get 1-2 FOTA directors seats to represent them all, (fat chance of that ever happening though)



ArnageWRC

2,331 posts

188 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
If they quit, so what?
They should return to Sportscars, much less politics and far more diversity in cars/ engines, etc