Narain Karthikeyan
Author
Discussion

944fan

Original Poster:

4,962 posts

214 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
How on earth did he get to drive in F1? There doesn't seem to be single pratice/qualy/race where he doesn't get in someones way. I know he's probably got the stest car but he is always dead last after being lapped 5 times.

Wonder why he botheres at all

Dr Z

3,396 posts

200 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
So you say if you had the money (and the ability) to be able to drive around in an F1 car around the world in illustrious company, you wouldn't?

Yeah, he was average back when he had a chance in a midfield runner. He seems average now, one of the by-products of having a st car I suppose?

telecat

8,528 posts

270 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Nope He is crap. He does not seem to know what is going on around him most of the time. Now he is in a Crappier car it shows up even more.

rallycross

13,737 posts

266 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
944fan said:
How on earth did he get to drive in F1?
there are about 10 million reasons (dollars that is).

DanDC5

19,991 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
He reminds me of Giovanni Lavaggi, nothing more than a mobile chicane.

coppice

9,698 posts

173 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
He isn't going to win a GP but having watched him race in F3 etc he is a competent driver- and face it , even the backmarkers in F1 are on a different planet to most of us keyboard warriors.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
coppice said:
He isn't going to win a GP but having watched him race in F3 etc he is a competent driver- and face it , even the backmarkers in F1 are on a different planet to most of us keyboard warriors.
That. If he was in a half decent car he would probably be turning in half decent times; it's not like the old days where people who really couldn't drive at all would end up in F1.

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
He was faster than Glock in 1st practice and De La Rosa in 2nd practice. So while he's a bit crap, he's not in the Yuji Ide bracket of ineptitude.

KevSeymour

773 posts

202 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
coppice said:
He isn't going to win a GP but having watched him race in F3 etc he is a competent driver- and face it , even the backmarkers in F1 are on a different planet to most of us keyboard warriors.
But he's not better than the 4 or 5 drivers who've all got much more talent than him that've had to look for drives in other categories recently. I'm not suggesting that a car at the back of the grid would have been good enough for someone like Barrichello, but someone like Sutil deserves a drive more than Karthikeyan - despite his off track antics.

But this is what happens when teams who can't really afford to be in F1 are given entries.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
The real question is how did he get an F1 Super-licence?

(after all the talk from Spankie about making it harder)

Adrian W

15,449 posts

257 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
The real question is how did he get an F1 Super-licence?

(after all the talk from Spankie about making it harder)
Give ma about twenty million Simon and I'll get you one

RenesisEvo

3,826 posts

248 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
groomi said:
He was faster than Glock in 1st practice...
Who did 7 laps to Karthikeyan's 23. I suspect there was a technical issue.

Crafty_

14,062 posts

229 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
The real question is how did he get an F1 Super-licence?

(after all the talk from Spankie about making it harder)
TBH I don't think getting the license is all that difficult, Kimi managed it (originally) with something like 20 formula renault races under his belt. If you don't qualify by having done enough national/international racing I think there is some sort of appeal basis where they look at a driver on a case by case basis.

Of course, wherever a subjective decision is to be made, people can be influenced (shall we say). On a completely different note, imagine Bernie wanted to see a full grid and a team has a potential paying driver.. a quiet word in the right places...

I agree there are better drivers who deserve a place in F1 over Narain, but you wouldn't really wish an HRT on them..

vescaegg

30,112 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
His car is horrendous. But I think he's pretty average for an F1 driver too....

As mentioned before his spacial awareness seems to be a bit hit and miss.

However, he's obviously an outstanding driver to be where he is. The fact he can actually drive an F1 car at all and not instantly crash surely proves that.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

276 months

Friday 22nd June 2012
quotequote all
I think it is too easy to dismiss the drivers at the back of the grid.

My eyes were opened by the interview with Pedro de la Rosa ahead of the Spanish GP.

Driving an HRT, he also has the experience of driving much better cars - he was a McLaren test driver remember and also drove for Sauber, so he knows a good car from a bad one.

He explained how for large parts of the circuit his HRT would be going sideways with oversteer / under steer and a general lack of grip everywhere. Where other cars would grip and go, the HRT would slide and generally try and crash wherever it could.

You need big cahunas to drive a bad car fast.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

246 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
As with many things in life, it's all down to money . . . . . my 2p, is that if his sponsors wanted to put an Indian in F1, they have been far better with Karun Chandhok, who IMHO did a better job than Bruno Senna, when they were team mates

Redlake27

2,255 posts

273 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
He ain't bad. He isn't a topliner, but he is certainly not a Lavaggi type of makeweight.

In the Jordan in 2005, and compared to his teammates at HRT (including Senna and De La Rosa) he has usually been at a simiar level. He is very good in the wet, and is a sensible racer that usually stays out of trouble.

De La Rosa and Narain are not the two drivers HRT would choose if they were a frontrunning team, but they need experienced drivers who can get them into the money-paying Top Ten in the Constructors championship. Two steady experienced drivers are more likely to do that by being there at the end of a freak race, rather than a pair of fresh-out-of-GP2 drivers who may go a couple of tenths quicker, but their need to prove themselves creates mistakes.

rigga

8,805 posts

230 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
He got a drive through penalty for speeding in the pits,never thought hed get accused of being too quick.

BenniiP

187 posts

177 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
rigga said:
He got a drive through penalty for speeding in the pits,never thought hed get accused of being too quick.
There was a lot of ironic laughter in this household when that message appeared onscreen...at least he outqualified Pic and finished the race.

JxT

339 posts

203 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Redlake27 said:
compared to his teammates at HRT (including Senna and De La Rosa) he has usually been at a simiar level.
I really don't agree.

Firstly I dont believe he's ever driven with Senna.

He has consistently been off the pace of DLR in qualifying this season.... and Pedro is hardly famed for strong one lap pace.

But for the Tata money he brings, he would be nowhere near F1.