Discussion
I was wondering what the benefit of the "horns" are on this years McLaren F1 car. I'm wondering if it has some sort of reverse venturi effect, but surely this would provide lift and not aid downforce? Is it to aid straight line ability, making the car cut through the air cleaner?
Any suggestions anyone?
Any suggestions anyone?
daydreamer said:
They will be chasing the holy grail of smooth air flow to the rear wing. No idea if they would work though.
Like you i've no idea what they actually do but would assume that they must work or why else have them there?? F1 teams want to keep the weight down, these two horns even if they are only 600grms each would be shed if they were doing nothing.
I wondered if they did a similar job to the wing end plates on the front and rear wings? channel the air over surfaces that give down force???
Nowadays, with so many areas of the car off limits for aerodynamic devices, designers tend to slot them in wherever the legislation doesn't prohibit them. Although the McLaren "horns" are quite interesting and rather aesthetic, the vast majority of these aerodynamic add-ons are just plain ugly and should be prohibited on that ground alone.
Isn't that why the 1998 "towers" got banned?
Isn't that why the 1998 "towers" got banned?
Thought it was very coincidental that they answered an ITV viewer's e-mail on the very same thing!
Who else thought it was such a shame that JPM missed the pitlane when ordered in, and had to go in after Kimi, then had to run the pitlane red light to get back in formation. Before that he was motoring and would have arguably won the race himself.
F1 is back!
Who else thought it was such a shame that JPM missed the pitlane when ordered in, and had to go in after Kimi, then had to run the pitlane red light to get back in formation. Before that he was motoring and would have arguably won the race himself.
F1 is back!
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff