Matt Neal
Author
Discussion

CivicMan

Original Poster:

2,211 posts

230 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Matt states: "I'm here to win races..."

Matt does: waves Giovanardi through.

Plonker.

foreright

1,091 posts

271 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
CivicMan said:
Matt states: "I'm here to win races..."

Matt does: waves Giovanardi through.

Plonker.
Haha I just saw that too - what a plank. I'm waiting for Plato to attempt to overtake him and Matt to punt him off.

pies

13,116 posts

285 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Bit out of order frown

freedman

6,015 posts

236 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
So he waves all the Vauxhalls through and then races Plato.

I've always thought he was an arse

r5gttgaz

7,897 posts

249 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Cock. I hope they take him to task.

http://www.mattneal.co.uk/contact.php

Edited by r5gttgaz on Sunday 14th October 16:59

Fidgits

17,202 posts

258 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
whats the betting he's in a Vauxhall next year...


I met him when he was a privateer and found him to be the nicest bloke in BTCC (Back then)

Adrian W

15,483 posts

257 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
I always thought he was a good driver and had lots of respect for him, now i think he's a complete wr, wouldnt it be good if he got banned for next season for it.

Waved both Vauxhalls through and then baulked Plato.............tosser

Ruined the whole thing.

Edited by Adrian W on Sunday 14th October 17:03

sa_20v

4,112 posts

260 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
He is the most pathetic, catty driver I have ever witnessed. Sure Plato wasn't likely to win this race having made a hash of the start, but Neal's behaviour during the race hampered any chance of a comeback. Matt Neal is nothing more than a fool, a jealous, petty fool. Even injured Plato showed the ugly git how to drive...

Well done to Giovanardi though, great drive.

mattikake

5,115 posts

228 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
I thought it was well funny that Matt Neal helped Fabizio out. All those dirty Plato 'passing' moves coming back to bite him. Heh. What goes around comes around. smile

Athlon

5,861 posts

235 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
It was pathetic that Neal decided he had to be the one decide who won the championship, one of the most unsportslike things I have seen far a long time, my respect for him from back when he was a privateer has gone.

Spoilt, selfish brat IMO


sa_20v

4,112 posts

260 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
mattikake said:
I thought it was well funny that Matt Neal helped Fabizio out. All those dirty Plato 'passing' moves coming back to bite him. Heh. What goes around comes around. smile
Sure, completely fair to prevent someone from fighting for the Championship...rolleyes

Have you actually followed BTCC for more than one race? Do you understand the history between these drivers? Obviously not.

NightDriver

1,082 posts

255 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Matt Neal seems to think the championship should be all about him, even when he cant win it. What a complete c*ck. He prevented what could have been an awesome battle between Fabrizio and Jason, I'm not bothered who won but would have loved to have seen the fight.

Chocmonster

962 posts

240 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
You don't think that Plato would have done exactly the same if the situation has been reversed?Looking at it from an officials point of view Neal didn't do anything wrong, however the same can not be said for Plato with his barging (not only of Neal) and missing chicaines. He's shown over and over that he's no saint.

Athlon

5,861 posts

235 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
I agree he is no saint and I don't like the bloke, but neal was out of order and blatant with it, bottom line is the championship was decided on that race and neal had a hand in taking away the excitment for the fans. I even think Plato would have been hard if the positions were reversed but I very much doubt he would have allowed the Vauxhalls through.

sa_20v

4,112 posts

260 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Must say that Plato, rather than walking up to the guy and ripping his throat out, acted like a true sportsman post race - hugging Giovanardi and seemingly unphased by the actions of Matt Neal. I loved the comment 'we all know what to expect from him [Matt Neal]' - brilliant!

MonkeyHanger

9,267 posts

271 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
I've never been a Plato fan, simply because of his habit of punting people off but this season he's toned that down quite a bit and the battle between him & Giovanardi has been thoroughly enjoyable.

So, up steps the spoilt little daddy's boy (Neal) who is clearly in Vauxhall's pocket for next year to spoil the final race. I sincerely hope he enjoys being Fabrizio's No.2 next year because he certainly won't be pampered like he is at Team Dynamics.

Congratulations to Giovanardi on winning the title as he also seems to be a decent bloke as well as a quality driver, but both him and Plato would have deserved it if the final positions were reversed.

NightDriver

1,082 posts

255 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
sa_20v said:
Must say that Plato, rather than walking up to the guy and ripping his throat out, acted like a true sportsman post race - hugging Giovanardi and seemingly unphased by the actions of Matt Neal. I loved the comment 'we all know what to expect from him [Matt Neal]' - brilliant!
Thats the thing which gets me really. Giovanadi and Jason were happy with how they have raced against each other all season, they were prepared for a good battle in the final race and they demonstrate a mutual respect for each other. Matt Neal is a bit upset with Jason for beating him so he decides to teach him a lesson...

A few years ago Matt was a nice, fair guy. Now he comes across as a complete arse.

Edited by NightDriver on Sunday 14th October 17:37

freedman

6,015 posts

236 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Chocmonster said:
You don't think that Plato would have done exactly the same if the situation has been reversed?Looking at it from an officials point of view Neal didn't do anything wrong, however the same can not be said for Plato with his barging (not only of Neal) and missing chicaines. He's shown over and over that he's no saint.
Had the positions been reversed Plato may have done the same thing (though I doubt it)but I cant believe that deliberately waving two competitors through and then deliberately baulking a 3rd is legitimate racing (when your team is not involved.) And laughable after his we're here to win comments.

And thos commenting on Paltos racecraft really shgould take a look at some of the manouveres that Neal has got away with over the years, he is without doubt the dirtiest driver in the series (though Collard was almost as bad)


off_again

13,917 posts

263 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
whats the betting he's in a Vauxhall next year...


I met him when he was a privateer and found him to be the nicest bloke in BTCC (Back then)
From what I understand, that was certainly the case. After years of trying they managed to win the TOCA challenge and bag the prize money. After that it seems to have gone to his head and seems a bit of a cock. Quite why he would wave through the Vauxhalls and then try and duke it out with Plato is beyond me. What, did he think that the TV cameras would miss that one?

Nah, fully expect him to be racing with Vauxhall in 2008. Plainly cannot cut it with the current team and needs to start winning again. Ok, its to be expected that you go for it as a racing driver, but I have to say that he isnt yet and has given away some of the very valuable points that he keeps bleating on about.

Monkey of the first order.

mattsayle

1,799 posts

227 months

Sunday 14th October 2007
quotequote all
Its a shame plato didnt hit him harder. He said before the race he would race how he would expect plato to. Surly he doesnt think that lowly of plato does he???