RedBull engine cover
Author
Discussion

lockup

Original Poster:

383 posts

271 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
To the RedBull aerodynamics guy I met on the Silverstone ARDS course yesterday:

Was this your idea?

update: linky

If not, give Newey a slap from me, ta wink

Either way, roll on 2009!!!



The StockHatch spinner.


Edited by lockup on Friday 1st February 16:21

Flying Toilet

3,621 posts

240 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
lockup said:
To the RedBull aerodynamics guy I met on the Silverstone ARDS course yesterday:

Was this your idea?


If not, give Newey a slap from me, ta wink

Either way, roll on 2009!!!



The StockHatch spinner.
That's one of Newey's it was tried last year aswell.

Teppic

8,073 posts

286 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
I really hope that engine cover gets banned. It's absolutely fugly!

Edited by Teppic on Saturday 2nd February 22:06

S4E Jord

1,589 posts

236 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
i cant see it. i want to see the fugly thing!

lockup

Original Poster:

383 posts

271 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
S4E Jord said:
i cant see it. i want to see the fugly thing!
My bad - link to story now in original post.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
Surprised to see Newey picking up influences from the McLaren aero department before he was there hehe

mchammer89

3,127 posts

242 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
Not exactly a cutting edge design is it?

Jag tried the same thing in the 50's with the D-Type, though i've got a feeling the Red Bull won't benefit as much.

D_Mike

5,301 posts

269 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
i think it looks cool.

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
Did they buy an A1 GP car...one way to save money I guess....

...or as someone alluded to...it's a 1995 McLaren isn't it?

Edited by rubystone on Friday 1st February 18:29

Andy47

132 posts

235 months

Saturday 2nd February 2008
quotequote all
rubystone said:
...it's a 1995 McLaren isn't it?
Lol, that's what I thought when I first saw it.

I really don't like it, though I suppose it's good for increased sponsor area!

johnph

1,097 posts

258 months

Saturday 2nd February 2008
quotequote all
How many Jagerbulls had they had to drink when they designed that?

sniff petrol

13,125 posts

241 months

Sunday 3rd February 2008
quotequote all
Be suprised if they use that at all the tracks though, maybe just for higher speed stability or something?

motormania

1,143 posts

282 months

Monday 4th February 2008
quotequote all
If this huge advertising plank is being used due to stability issues with the car, would it be wrong to suggest that Newey has lost his edge.

To have made a base chassis so unstable to a point that requires the team to borrow the mother-in-laws picnic table to attach to the rear is rather strange??

D_Mike

5,301 posts

269 months

Monday 4th February 2008
quotequote all
the cars are going to slide more this year due to more basic engine management software and this fin apparently means more consistent downforce when sliding... the wings don't work as well when air flows across them at an angle.

Civpilot

6,257 posts

269 months

Tuesday 5th February 2008
quotequote all
Some random F1 site said:
F1 was in shock yesterday as Redbull unvield their new rear engine cover. When asked to comment on his inspiration of the design Adrian Newey was heard to reply "hang on, this is the bit with he saves the clown at the airshow!"

Rumours that RedBull are going to re-design the cockpit area to allow for an inovative new crash helmet design are currently unfounded, although Newey was seen in a heated descussion with David Coultard whilst holding this image, beleived to be another Neway design...


The team were also hit with reliability issues later in the session beleived to be fueling related. Adrian Newey was heard to be asking round the pit garage if anyone had some "half chewed gum?"
hehe