Nigel gets off!
Author
Discussion

RobbieMeister

Original Poster:

1,307 posts

299 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Stepney has been told off by the FIA.

They have also told the motorsport world that he is not to be trusted untill 1st July 2009. Presumably after that he will be trustworthy again.

I'm lost for words.

Joe911

2,763 posts

264 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Surely a small fine would be in order - $10m, maybe - no, OK. Was he wearing red perhaps?

FourWheelDrift

92,256 posts

313 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Autosport said:
The FIA will take no formal steps against Nigel Stepney but has warned motorsport teams from collaborating with the former Ferrari engineer until the summer of 2009.
Makes you wonder what evidence he had to give that could have meant a back down and reversal of the FIA decisions from last year perhaps.

Hope his book gets published before 2009.

Derek Smith

49,711 posts

277 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
RobbieMeister said:
Stepney has been told off by the FIA.

They have also told the motorsport world that he is not to be trusted untill 1st July 2009. Presumably after that he will be trustworthy again.

I'm lost for words.
Going by the FIA report of the enquiry, there was evidence against only four people for acting corruptly: Alonso, de la Rosa, Coughlan and Stepney. One has had a slap on the wrist, two others have had nothing, and the fourth, well he does wear silver so crucification is probable.

I'm not lost for words. Two come to mind: it stinks.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Joe911 said:
Surely a small fine would be in order - $10m, maybe - no, OK. Was he wearing red perhaps?
A fine for who?

Joe911

2,763 posts

264 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
SamHH said:
A fine for who?
Stepney, perhaps.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Joe911 said:
SamHH said:
A fine for who?
Stepney, perhaps.
Has he got $10,000,000?

Dunit

645 posts

234 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
I have just read Stepneys reply on Autosport in which he states that the information that was passed to his mate of 22 years was nothing like the famous 760 page document and that he wrote to Max in august about this with no reply.
What i find wrong with this whole charade is how the FIA reached their finding and the huge fine without Stepney being present at that time as he wanted to attend.
Could be that he is talking it up for his book launch but as others have stated this whole affair stinks.

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

246 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Got to agree that the FIA have handled the whole affair, including the Stepney angle, very badly.

As Stepney says in the Autosport article the FIA should have know from the start that they couldn't ban him.
.......................
In the last paragraph Stepney says:

"Right now, I'm getting on with the job that's been my life and enjoying my family, who've suffered enormously and stood by me throughout, in peace."

Anyone know what his job is at the moment?

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Skeggy i believe he is working with gigawave motorsport as a technical director.

flemke

23,482 posts

266 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
RobbieMeister said:
Stepney has been told off by the FIA.

They have also told the motorsport world that he is not to be trusted untill 1st July 2009. Presumably after that he will be trustworthy again.

I'm lost for words.
Going by the FIA report of the enquiry, there was evidence against only four people for acting corruptly: Alonso, de la Rosa, Coughlan and Stepney. One has had a slap on the wrist, two others have had nothing, and the fourth, well he does wear silver so crucification is probable.

I'm not lost for words. Two come to mind: it stinks.
You've got to love it.
The Pride and Poise Boys at the FIA say there is only evidence that four people acted corruptly, all from McLaren.
The fact that Coughlan swore an affidavit in June stating that he had received all his information from Stepney was not evidence, right?
Min Mosley strikes again.

And what the chances that someone has whispered in Stepney's ear that the Italian mags can be persuaded to go easy on him - so long as his forthcoming book says nothing too incriminating about, as he put it, "where the bodies are buried"?

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

246 months

Saturday 8th March 2008
quotequote all
Tux - thanks.

Flemke -

"The Pride and Poise Boys at the FIA..." biglaugh

"...the Italian mags can be persuaded to go easy on him...." so you know the way they 'work' as well wink

CanAm

13,915 posts

301 months

Sunday 9th March 2008
quotequote all
OK, so if Stepney swears that he didn't send the 760 pp document to Coughlan, who did?
And I may have missed it, but has the alleged photocopier shop whistle-blower gone public and been identified?
No wonder Max didn't want Stepney at the hearing!

As many others have said, the whole affair stinks.