The six-wheeler Tyrell... was it any good?
The six-wheeler Tyrell... was it any good?
Author
Discussion

glazbagun

Original Poster:

15,216 posts

222 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Just found this while browsing Jackie Stewart vids:

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Jackie-Stewart-...

Since it was banned, I'm guessing it was either perceived, or proved an unfair advantage of some sort and others/Ferrari whined about it till it got the chop. Was it actually a good idea in an unrestricted sense? Or was it, rather, a clever interpretation of the rules which allowed a performance advantage over other cars confined by the same rules?

LukeBird

17,170 posts

234 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Yes it was, hence the banning smile
Old man Enzo couldn't take a joke, obviouslywink

Teppic

7,982 posts

282 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Williams also tried a six-wheeler, but in their case there were four driven wheels at the back, and two at the front. It was the Williams that led to six-wheelers being banned, as the FIA/FISA noticed that it had a massive performance advantage over its four-wheeled car when it shattered a lap record during testing.





Ferrari also tried a six-wheeler, but with four wheels on the same axle.





Edited by Teppic on Saturday 31st May 16:13

16VJay

236 posts

244 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
The first year for the P34 was 1976, best result was a 1-2 in Sweden and Tyrrell got third in the constructor's that year. Next year the cars had revised bodywork and were sponsored by First National instead of Elf, but their best result was a second in Canada.

I wasn't aware the P34 was banned, Goodyear chose to concentrate on standard tyre sizes in their second season, which obvioulsy killed it off.

Frik

13,667 posts

268 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
As I understand it, the big advantage was a much lower frontal area, aerodynamically, for the same amount of front end grip.

Wasn't there some issue with being able to get tyres for it too?

ETA: Beaten to it.

Edited by Frik on Saturday 31st May 00:41

deevlash

10,442 posts

262 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Teppic said:
Williams also tried a six-wheeler, but in their case there were four driven wheels at the back, and two at the front.

4 wheels at the back is a much better idea yes you could put wets on the foremost rears and slicks on the back 2 when it was raining and get loads of power down.

Teppic

7,982 posts

282 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
deevlash said:
Teppic said:
Williams also tried a six-wheeler, but in their case there were four driven wheels at the back, and two at the front.

4 wheels at the back is a much better idea yesyou could put wets on the foremost rears and slicks on the back 2 when it was raining and get loads of power down.
Williams did exactly that in testing (although not in that picture).

Edited by Teppic on Saturday 31st May 00:52

dickkark

748 posts

246 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
I`m a bit of a P34 nerd i`m afraid,
The p34 wasn`t banned it was dropped in 1978,by Tyrell them selves.
they blamed Goodyears lack of developement in the special tyres needed,coupled with the weight of the extra front suspension as the reason.
The idea of the small wheels was to reduce the frontal area thats why they had the 10" wheels on the front,but two sets to maintain the correct grip.
There is P34 chassis no 6 about still racing in an FIA historic series.
Six wheel cars were banned in 1993 from formula racing to stop manufacturers from building cars with four wheel drive by means of two rear axles,or twin rear wheels,ala Ferrari.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

286 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Didn't the Tyrell also have better 'turn in' for the likes of Monaco, etc?

deevlash

10,442 posts

262 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Teppic said:
deevlash said:
Teppic said:
Williams also tried a six-wheeler, but in their case there were four driven wheels at the back, and two at the front.

4 wheels at the back is a much better idea yesyou could put wets on the foremost rears and slicks on the back 2 when it was raining and get loads of power down.
Williams did exactly that in testing (although not in that picture).

Edited by Teppic on Saturday 31st May 00:52
yup, there was a really good article in autosport where they asked williams to design an f1 car without limits and they used this design again. It would have had full length skirts for ground effects, 6 wheels, 4 at the rear no real wings to speak of as the ground effect would have kept it sucked down enough. It looked crap I have to say.

Eric Mc

125,064 posts

290 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
The Williams 6 wheler was built with a different design concept in mind compared to the Tyrrell. As has been said, the Tyrrell's 6 front wheels allowed a more efficient use of front end earodynamics. The Williams 6 wheeler was an attempt to better harness the airflow moving through the sidepods which, in the years 1979 to 1982, were the major source of sownforce on F1 cars.
March also built a 6 wheeler similar to the Williams one.

andy97

4,783 posts

247 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
March also built a 6 wheeler similar to the Williams one.
Which Roy lane Hillclimbed for a short while. I think it win a couple of British Hillclimb rounds in the wet but in the dry kept breaking gearboxes. It was converted back to a normal 4 wheel March after that.

freedman

5,987 posts

232 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
The March car ran in hillclimbing (Roy Lane) succesfully for a number of years and Jonathan Palmer held the hill record at Goodwood in the Williams until Heidfeld? broke it a couple of years ago http://www.geocities.com/simontmallett/240march1.h...

Edited by freedman on Saturday 31st May 08:45

nre

556 posts

295 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
dickkark said:
I`m a bit of a P34 nerd i`m afraid,
The p34 wasn`t banned it was dropped in 1978,by Tyrell them selves.
they blamed Goodyears lack of developement in the special tyres needed,coupled with the weight of the extra front suspension as the reason.
The idea of the small wheels was to reduce the frontal area thats why they had the 10" wheels on the front,but two sets to maintain the correct grip.
There is P34 chassis no 6 about still racing in an FIA historic series.
Six wheel cars were banned in 1993 from formula racing to stop manufacturers from building cars with four wheel drive by means of two rear axles,or twin rear wheels,ala Ferrari.
pic from last years hscc superprix at brands



Edited by nre on Saturday 31st May 13:17

FourWheelDrift

92,049 posts

309 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
There was also a six wheeled Formula 3 project.


aquilamotorsport

123 posts

219 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
of course ferraris idea wasnt exactly new!....ferrari using other peopels ideas...never i hear you say! http://www.speedace.info/automotive_directory/car_... mind same as the wheel disks...they were on the toms toyota f3 cars way back in the early 90s

andy97

4,783 posts

247 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
There was also a six wheeled Formula 3 project.

Yep, very amusing!

JonRB

79,710 posts

297 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
So an 8-wheel car could combine the advantages of both - in both cases the front pair on wets to clear the water for the slicks on the rear pair.

They could nickname it "the caterpillar" - it would look like one.

FourWheelDrift

92,049 posts

309 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
Seriously this time, an eight wheeled kart, with Jody Scheckter trying it out for size.


sniff petrol

13,124 posts

237 months

Saturday 31st May 2008
quotequote all
deevlash said:
yup, there was a really good article in autosport where they asked williams to design an f1 car without limits and they used this design again. It would have had full length skirts for ground effects, 6 wheels, 4 at the rear no real wings to speak of as the ground effect would have kept it sucked down enough. It looked crap I have to say.
F1 Racing magazine about 4 years ago IIRC