I have complete confidence in McLaren ...
I have complete confidence in McLaren ...
Author
Discussion

ph123

Original Poster:

1,841 posts

247 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
... having the ability, to completely ignore common sense and lose Hamilton the championship for the second year running.
Is Hamilton going to have to win the championship, DESPITE his team?
Undoubtedly, they've hit the sweet spot with the car's setup but he must start to wonder whose side they're on.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
have to say, I agree with you...

Said it before, whenever it comes to mid-race decisions, they almost always get it wrong.

Amazing really, just don't understand how they have not sorted this part of the team out yet? can you imagine Ross Braun making these kind of mistakes?

ph123

Original Poster:

1,841 posts

247 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
I see Ron says the 'strategists' are in Woking.
Like they can see that cleaning up after Glock would only take a couple of laps.

sstein

6,249 posts

283 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
The way Ferrari are going, I expect more mistakes from them strategy wise then Mclaren.

-

Stuart

DangerousMike

11,327 posts

221 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
2 weeks time...

Ferrari turn up to the wrong circuit...

John D.

20,988 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
sstein said:
The way Ferrari are going, I expect more mistakes from them strategy wise then Mclaren.

-

Stuart
yes Have to agree.


RE McLaren tactics - On the bright side it made for a great finale today. Love watching Lewis get in amongst it thumbup

mcdjl

5,753 posts

224 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
Ron probably thought "what do people want to see....a nice procession to the finish or an actual race....."
(well he almost certainly didn't but i wish he had done)

belleair302

7,008 posts

236 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
The software programmes used and the probability calculus used in F1 is amazing, most of theses guys have degrees and experience in gambling and futures trading environments.

When the computers flash up what will happen and the supercomputers these guys use is beyond our comprehension, team principles act upon it. McLaren won, the race was good to watch but people make mistakes and there is the what if scenario.....

McLaren will deliver more than Ferrari of track, the issue now rests with drivers and on track engineering.

Fire99

9,865 posts

258 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
I don't think this year McLaren or Ferrari have the best strategists. I think its lucky for Mclaren that Ross Brawn is with Honda as IMO he is the best strategist on the tour..

But saying that i think it will make good racing for the rest of the year as you really dont know what will happen from one race to the next.

Lewis Hamilton is in a very strong position with a great car and alot of confidence right now..

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
belleair302 said:
When the computers flash up what will happen and the supercomputers these guys use is beyond our comprehension, team principles act upon it.
laugh You'll find far more powerful computers running your average high street retailer than they use for strategy calls, a basic laptop will do the trick. They save the large processing power for the design staff and wind tunnel data processing.

You can't beat a good brain such as Ross possesses for this kind of thing.

Dunit

645 posts

234 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
Also by doing this they did not have to have Heiki waiting while they fueled Lewis so they got both cars well up in the points.
No doubt that Hamilton is a class act.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
I think the mistakes Hamilton made in the past have served him well. He looks so confident in his ability and the car and is not driving on the ragged edge so much. Kimi - take note!!!

DJC

23,563 posts

265 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
Well it was pretty obvious what happened. I was doing the ironing whilst watching the race and still called it to the wife. "Macca thought they were going to have 3 laps more for Lewis than they did and give him 20 secs" were pretty much my exact words, lo and behold Ron mentions the 3 laps bit later on. All fairly obvious to me. He didnt need the 25 seconds, just 20 to get him back out there or thereabouts around Massa.

As to why they didnt bring him in, it was all because of the tyres. 25 laps or so on the soft compound tyres and with Lewis they were pushing him right to the edge of their durability. They fell a cropper last yr on that exact thing, so it would have made sense to them to go conservative this time around. They gambled on the short stay for the safety car, but knew that even if they got the gamble wrong Lewis had the speed to get up to Massa anyway. They were in a no-win situation with the safety car, but with the speed Lewis had they were also in a strange sort of way in a no-lose situation.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
Yes it's obvious what happened, everyone can see that, but the people here are arguing that it was a tactical mistake by McLaren which could potentially have lost them the race.

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
but if they tried to run him on soft tyres for the whole of the last stint (safety car onwards) he would have destroyed the tyres and possibly had a puncture.....this WOULD have lost him the race.

I think they made the correwct decision. Afterall they have a lot more data than the armchairs F1 bosses on here.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
DJC said:
Well it was pretty obvious what happened. I was doing the ironing whilst watching the race and still called it to the wife. "Macca thought they were going to have 3 laps more for Lewis than they did and give him 20 secs" were pretty much my exact words, lo and behold Ron mentions the 3 laps bit later on. All fairly obvious to me. He didnt need the 25 seconds, just 20 to get him back out there or thereabouts around Massa.

As to why they didnt bring him in, it was all because of the tyres. 25 laps or so on the soft compound tyres and with Lewis they were pushing him right to the edge of their durability. They fell a cropper last yr on that exact thing, so it would have made sense to them to go conservative this time around. They gambled on the short stay for the safety car, but knew that even if they got the gamble wrong Lewis had the speed to get up to Massa anyway. They were in a no-win situation with the safety car, but with the speed Lewis had they were also in a strange sort of way in a no-lose situation.
sorry, 3 laps would have made no difference relativly....

he was some 12 sec's ahead at his finnal stop, and needed 20+, he was not 2.7 sec's a lap faster than Massa.

as for this tyre talk, yes I am sure they/he is harder on them, but by how much is a moot point, this year we have seen no evidence to suggest it's the problem you are making it out to be... after all, one weekends 'soft' is another weekends prime....



Edited by Scuffers on Monday 21st July 10:03

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
zac510 said:
Yes it's obvious what happened, everyone can see that, but the people here are arguing that it was a tactical mistake by McLaren which could potentially have lost them the race.
Well you say that, and I see where you're coming from, but I don't see it as a tactical mistake, more of a judgement call.

There was the balance of risk to be assessed

- 29 laps on the soft tires which we know LH doesn't get on with due to his loose style, or

- stay out behind the SC and have 10 clear laps to jet off the front of the pack, knowing that FM is stuck behind the one stopping Renault and not showing much pace. What they didn't allow for was the SC staying out for a couple of laps longer than anticipated.

They knew with fresh soft tires after his pitstop he would be 1-2 secs per lap quicker than the rest - and knowing the excellent overtaking opportunity into the hairpin that he'd be able to get back some places.

A judgement call (albeit a risky one) not a mistake, imo

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
I agree hornetrider smile

Doobs

736 posts

279 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
Much like the critical reviews of Silverstone, why is there an assumption that the "alternative" would have won the race? If he had shredded the back tyres by running long on the soft option, fallen off the track and got no points at all then it would hardly have been clever.

McLaren have made two very difficult calls in two races. I think they were right both times.

DSM2

3,624 posts

229 months

Monday 21st July 2008
quotequote all
I think McLaren's real advantage is that Ferrari have one driver who regularly stuggles to get his car set up properly and another who can only win from the very front, even when he has a quick car.

I thought Massa's capitulation to Hamilton was pathetic, but not unexpected.