Discussion
What happens to a car when the KERS system fails? I know this is a bit theoretical at the moment but would the KERS
1. Stop, and the car keeps running without the system
2. Stop and kill the car
3. Stop, explode and kill everything within a 100m radius
???
1. Stop, and the car keeps running without the system
2. Stop and kill the car
3. Stop, explode and kill everything within a 100m radius
???
Edited by ajprice on Thursday 15th January 15:15
I would imagine that, as KERS will be powering a boost button which is apparantly going to give the engine another 80bhp for overtaking (personally I think that sort of thing belongs solely in A1GP but there you go), if KERS were to fail then the boost button would probably just not work. But saying that, we all saw what happened when BMW were testing their system. Let's hope it doesn't happen now the systems are supposedly refined, or the K in KFC could stand for kubica or Kovalainen.
The spinning flywheel is contained within a casing similar to that used in aircraft engines.
The aviation industry learnt how to stop turbine failure resulting in fan blades flying out of the engine and puncturing bits of the plane ages ago. There is basically a very strong ring in the engine casing around the blades. The same technology can be used in the flywheel casing, no problem.
The aviation industry learnt how to stop turbine failure resulting in fan blades flying out of the engine and puncturing bits of the plane ages ago. There is basically a very strong ring in the engine casing around the blades. The same technology can be used in the flywheel casing, no problem.
The KERS flywheel is pretty light, most of it is carbon fibre. It will be spinning at 200K rpm though so has some potential for damage. The mechanical version is mounted in front of the engine where the fuel cell usually sits, with a direct link to the crankshaft, It has a form of internal CVT to accelerate, decelerate the flywheel. The one i saw didn't look like it had anything other than a magnesium casing around the flywheel, but it was a prototype.
dpbird90 said:
I would imagine that, as KERS will be powering a boost button which is apparantly going to give the engine another 80bhp for overtaking (personally I think that sort of thing belongs solely in A1GP but there you go), if KERS were to fail then the boost button would probably just not work. But saying that, we all saw what happened when BMW were testing their system. Let's hope it doesn't happen now the systems are supposedly refined, or the K in KFC could stand for kubica or Kovalainen.
Is there a video of what happened? i heard that a bolty got buzzed but didnt hear alot more about it.Fire99 said:
All sounds very complicated. Don't suppose we could have a lightweight car, huge fat tyres, simple aerodynamics and a small turbocharged engine (to keep the greenies happy) kicking out about 900bhp could we?
Oh and bung in a manual gearchange to spice things up a bit.
Champ car ;-)Oh and bung in a manual gearchange to spice things up a bit.

johnfelstead said:
The KERS flywheel is pretty light, most of it is carbon fibre. It will be spinning at 200K rpm though so has some potential for damage. The mechanical version is mounted in front of the engine where the fuel cell usually sits, with a direct link to the crankshaft, It has a form of internal CVT to accelerate, decelerate the flywheel. The one i saw didn't look like it had anything other than a magnesium casing around the flywheel, but it was a prototype.
ah, so they'll use it to add extra torque during accel up to 18000 rpm? sounds like a neat solution 
I seem to recall from articles on the GM Patriot that they had designed the flywheel to disintigrate rather than leave the housing and had conducted tests which proved their design.
I suspect that there are numerous engine and gearbox components that possess rather more kinetic energy at full chat than a KERS flywheel will.
I suspect that there are numerous engine and gearbox components that possess rather more kinetic energy at full chat than a KERS flywheel will.
Dr KT said:
Fire99 said:
All sounds very complicated. Don't suppose we could have a lightweight car, huge fat tyres, simple aerodynamics and a small turbocharged engine (to keep the greenies happy) kicking out about 900bhp could we?
Oh and bung in a manual gearchange to spice things up a bit.
Champ car ;-)Oh and bung in a manual gearchange to spice things up a bit.


I know F1 should be at the top-end of engineering but i think things like KERS make the racing too fussy and over complex.
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


