what are they investigating Brawn for?
what are they investigating Brawn for?
Author
Discussion

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,898 posts

221 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
They said that they maybe have a wing that is too good, etc... what else is the situation or is it just a case that they are too good for a new team???

RichB

56,266 posts

313 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Google F1 Diffuser row...

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,898 posts

221 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
did fezza have anything to do with that?

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
I think they will be given the all clear to be honest but the other teams will be able to update there cars."D Day" is the 14th April.

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

272 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Well if the Brawn's get disqualified which I very much doubt, then Hamilton get's the 1st place.

timbob

2,205 posts

281 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
CatherineJ said:
Well if the Brawn's get disqualified which I very much doubt, then Hamilton get's the 1st place.
They won't and he won't.

The stewards declared the Brawns (and the Williamses and the Toyotas for that matter) legal to race. So they are legal. Some other teams are appealing that decision (but the hearing isn't for 2 weeks), so up until that point they will continue to remain legal.

If the diffusers are declared illegal at the appeal hearing (and the general opinion of the pitlane is that they won't be), then the 3 teams will have to modify them, but as they were declared legal by the Melbourne stewards, no results will be altered and the victory and points will stand.

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

253 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
I can't see them over-ruling the Melbourne Stewards. If they did, it undermines the Race Stewards' authority, and makes a mockery of the rule book.


anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Personally i think the only reason red bull and the like are complaining is because they are pissed they didnt think of it first!

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Todays race demonstrated that the 'standard diffusers' didn't stop Red Bull and BMW running right in amongst Brawn & Toyota with Williams although quick at times were generally slower.

With this in mind, the protested diffusers are legal to the letter and offer no significant performance advantage.

I can't see them being banned.

Airbag

3,466 posts

225 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
timbob said:
CatherineJ said:
Well if the Brawn's get disqualified which I very much doubt, then Hamilton get's the 1st place.
They won't and he won't.

The stewards declared the Brawns (and the Williamses and the Toyotas for that matter) legal to race. So they are legal. Some other teams are appealing that decision (but the hearing isn't for 2 weeks), so up until that point they will continue to remain legal.

If the diffusers are declared illegal at the appeal hearing (and the general opinion of the pitlane is that they won't be), then the 3 teams will have to modify them, but as they were declared legal by the Melbourne stewards, no results will be altered and the victory and points will stand.
That was my understanding too, it seems a bit unfair to tell someone their car is legal and then scoop the point out from underneath them.

Then again, the FIA aren't always hell bent on fairness in sport, now are they?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

278 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Dupont666 said:
did fezza have anything to do with that?
yes, the FIA will tirelessly search for issues and find issues with everyone's car until FM and KR get awarded a 1-2

rolleyes

ehyouwhat

4,606 posts

247 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Dupont666 said:
did fezza have anything to do with that?
yes, the FIA will tirelessly search for issues and find issues with everyone's car until FM and KR get awarded a 1-2

rolleyes
Joking aside, I wouldn't be suprised one little bit.

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
thunderbelmont said:
I can't see them over-ruling the Melbourne Stewards. If they did, it undermines the Race Stewards' authority, and makes a mockery of the rule book.
God help us if that ever happens...

youngsyr

14,742 posts

221 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
I know someone who placed £100 on a Brawn 1-2 finish... at 100/1!

Fair to say he's hoping the results stand! laugh

FourWheelDrift

92,297 posts

313 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
Anyone notice the rear of the Red Bull and Torro Rosso's (those 4 identical cars? wink). They both have a rear end plates that go down in height as far as the rear diffuser, alomost down the track level. No one else is doing this. I wonder if Speccy Newey has come up with a rear end solution without tweaking the diffuser. Using something else such as the end plates on the rear wing to get better air flow at the back and create better rear end grip without going down the diffuser route. No one else seems to be doing this.

williamp

20,399 posts

302 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Anyone notice the rear of the Red Bull and Torro Rosso's (those 4 identical cars? wink). They both have a rear end plates that go down in height as far as the rear diffuser, alomost down the track level. No one else is doing this. I wonder if Speccy Newey has come up with a rear end solution without tweaking the diffuser. Using something else such as the end plates on the rear wing to get better air flow at the back and create better rear end grip without going down the diffuser route. No one else seems to be doing this.
I read that the Red bull have pull-rod, rather then push-rod rear suspension, which makes a larger diffuser impossible. Maybe that was what you saw

FourWheelDrift

92,297 posts

313 months

Sunday 29th March 2009
quotequote all
No the rear wing end plates are much bigger than on others, they go right down to floor height.

Red Bull - http://img.worldcarfans.com/2009/2/large/2009-red-...

For comparison (some big images) the others all finish above the height of the centre of the rear wheels.

BMW - http://totocaster.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2...
McLaren - http://www.f1-site.com/wallpapers/2009/presentatio...
Ferrari - http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2009/def/2009-Fe...

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Sunday 29th March 23:21

AlexS

1,593 posts

261 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Anyone notice the rear of the Red Bull and Torro Rosso's (those 4 identical cars? wink). They both have a rear end plates that go down in height as far as the rear diffuser, alomost down the track level. No one else is doing this. I wonder if Speccy Newey has come up with a rear end solution without tweaking the diffuser. Using something else such as the end plates on the rear wing to get better air flow at the back and create better rear end grip without going down the diffuser route. No one else seems to be doing this.
The RBR and STR have a completely different back end design to the other cars, with a very tight and compact rear, the aim being to improve airflow speed over the top of the car.

DSM2

3,624 posts

229 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
AlexS said:
FourWheelDrift said:
Anyone notice the rear of the Red Bull and Torro Rosso's (those 4 identical cars? wink). They both have a rear end plates that go down in height as far as the rear diffuser, alomost down the track level. No one else is doing this. I wonder if Speccy Newey has come up with a rear end solution without tweaking the diffuser. Using something else such as the end plates on the rear wing to get better air flow at the back and create better rear end grip without going down the diffuser route. No one else seems to be doing this.
The RBR and STR have a completely different back end design to the other cars, with a very tight and compact rear, the aim being to improve airflow speed over the top of the car.
and just why would they want to do that?

senninha1994

30 posts

213 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Is it not sour grapes on the part of the Red Bull's?
They are supposed to have the greatest F1 designer, then get beaten by Brawn?