Autosport snub Brawn GP
Autosport snub Brawn GP
Author
Discussion

7/11

Original Poster:

217 posts

239 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Amazing that this weeks edition fails to recognise Brawn GP achievement of winning Constructors Title, a real lost opportunity, it should have been a double celebration, not just Jenson. Ross, you and the team did a great job too even if Autosport failed to notice!

hot metal

2,019 posts

222 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Pityfull ,that reminds me I`ve forgotten to pick one up,damn.

RichB

56,257 posts

313 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Really, not that I've bought a copy but their web site is showing this as the cover of the current edition...

RedexR

1,861 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Yes , not hard to see why Roebuck etc have departed to a better quality magazine , Autosport seems to be losing it's way these days.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
I get the feeling you're a bit of a minority fan if you follow the teams closer than you follow the drivers. And the teams' marketing strategies and slightly lesser extend Autosport tend to follow reflect this.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
autosport is little more than a glossy comic, all pretty pictures but weak journalism, bar roebuck (if he still writes for it) and marcus pye it has nothing going for it....

LordGrover

34,158 posts

241 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Autosport 22 October.
You're kidding right? The first 19 pages are all Button/Brawn.

jellison

12,803 posts

306 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Autosport 22 October.
You're kidding right? The first 19 pages are all Button/Brawn.
Sounds like he is Smoking some Weird Sh*t!!!!!!!!!

RichB

56,257 posts

313 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
RichB said:
Really, not that I've bought a copy but their web site is showing this as the cover of the current edition...
So was this image deleted because Autosport is not a Haymarket publication?

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

279 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Yes, yes that's exactly why

the fact the image is still there and we own Autosport has no bearing at all

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Autosport is a Haymarket publication.

jellison

12,803 posts

306 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Lost me totally - not that I give a Rats!

RichB

56,257 posts

313 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Me too, I just wondered why the picture I posted is now a red cross but like you say, Im not that bothered.

7/11

Original Poster:

217 posts

239 months

Saturday 24th October 2009
quotequote all
Brawn is mentioned on the cover but that's about it, no joint celebration of the Button and Brawn unique achievement, would have been a wonderful opportunity but the magazine unbelievably missed it.I would expect that from The Sun but NOT Autosport

flemke

23,485 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
7/11 said:
Brawn is mentioned on the cover but that's about it, no joint celebration of the Button and Brawn unique achievement, would have been a wonderful opportunity but the magazine unbelievably missed it.I would expect that from The Sun but NOT Autosport
Just curious - what was the "unique achievement"?

eccles

14,368 posts

251 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
flemke said:
7/11 said:
Brawn is mentioned on the cover but that's about it, no joint celebration of the Button and Brawn unique achievement, would have been a wonderful opportunity but the magazine unbelievably missed it.I would expect that from The Sun but NOT Autosport
Just curious - what was the "unique achievement"?
Winning both championships in their first year as a team?

7/11

Original Poster:

217 posts

239 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
Well said Eccles!

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
flemke said:
7/11 said:
Brawn is mentioned on the cover but that's about it, no joint celebration of the Button and Brawn unique achievement, would have been a wonderful opportunity but the magazine unbelievably missed it.I would expect that from The Sun but NOT Autosport
Just curious - what was the "unique achievement"?
you gotta admit FLemke, he is right.

I don't think Autosport is as bad as is said here. I think Mark Hughes is a good journo - his insight has always been very good. Piola's drawingas and Gary Anderson's analysis together are worth the cover price alone. FWIW I personally don't like Pye - I have reasons that I won't go into here.

hot metal

2,019 posts

222 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
Maybe they are spreading it out a little and will make more of a meal of the Brawn achievement in the next issue.

Ahonen

5,032 posts

308 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
eccles said:
flemke said:
7/11 said:
Brawn is mentioned on the cover but that's about it, no joint celebration of the Button and Brawn unique achievement, would have been a wonderful opportunity but the magazine unbelievably missed it.I would expect that from The Sun but NOT Autosport
Just curious - what was the "unique achievement"?
Winning both championships in their first year as a team?
It was a change of name and ownership, not a new team. As everyone knows. Except you, seemingly.

The focus has always been on the drivers' championship ahead of the teams' and, let's face it, a British driver won.