Red 5 back in F1?
Author
Discussion

_Batty_

Original Poster:

12,268 posts

279 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
So Lewis came 5th in the drivers, ( behind 2 Brawn and 2 Redbull) so does this mean next year he'll be number 5?
And Mclaren usually have red numbers on their cars (thanks to Vodaphone).
Will be ace to see another Red 5 champion smile


Project 644

37,069 posts

217 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
_Batty_ said:
So Lewis came 5th in the drivers, ( behind 2 Brawn and 2 Redbull) so does this mean next year he'll be number 5?
And Mclaren usually have red numbers on their cars (thanks to Vodaphone).
Will be ace to see another Red 5 champion smile
C- Your working out was wrong but your answer was correct.

It will be done on the Constructors after the winning WDC number 1 is given.

So Jenson gets 1, Rosberg (or whoever wink )gets 2, Vettel gets 3 (because Red Bull finished second in the constructors, their drivers get 3 and 4) Webber gets 4, Lewis will get 5 due to McLaren finishing 3rd in the WCC rather than Lewis finishing 5th in the WDC. smile

Muzzer

3,814 posts

250 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
Yep, assuming everyone carries on as per previous years IINM, we'll have:

1. Jenson Button
2. Probably Nico Rosberg
3. Seb Vettel
4. Mark Webber
5. Lewis Hamilton
6. Kimi or Heikki
7. Fernando Alonso
8. Felipe Massa
9. Rubens Barrichello
10. Nico Hulkenberg
11. Probably Timo Glock
12. Robert Kubica
14. Adrian Sutil
15. Vito Liuzzi
16. Sebastian Buemi
17. Jaime Alguersari

The next numbers will be taken by the new teams. God knows what order they'll be in.

However, it might be worth an outside bet on car no. 22 being as that car has won the WDC by finishing 5th in Brazil for the last 2 years. biggrin


llewop

3,958 posts

240 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
Maybe - but not by the process you suggest: car numbers are allocated on team position, after the World Champion gets number 1 on his car, the remainder of numbers are allocated by finishing order in the constructors championship.

So depending on what Button does; Hamilton is likely to end up with number 5 (or 6)(as you say - but because McLaren were 3rd in the CWC), number 2 (if Button jumps to McLaren!) or even number 7 or 8 if Button were to jump somewhere else!

Odds on you are right though...McLaren then just need to get the right tin of paint out!!

  • For once I've not checked the FIA regs to confirm my intepretation, so could be wrong!

garycat

5,379 posts

239 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
llewop said:
Maybe - but not by the process you suggest: car numbers are allocated on team position, after the World Champion gets number 1 on his car, the remainder of numbers are allocated by finishing order in the constructors championship.

So depending on what Button does; Hamilton is likely to end up with number 5 (or 6)(as you say - but because McLaren were 3rd in the CWC), number 2 (if Button jumps to McLaren!) or even number 7 or 8 if Button were to jump somewhere else!

Odds on you are right though...McLaren then just need to get the right tin of paint out!!

  • For once I've not checked the FIA regs to confirm my intepretation, so could be wrong!
I can't see McLaren painting the car number red unless it is a part of their Santander/Vodafone livery. They never were fans of Mansell, and Lewis personally has always cited Senna as his main inspiration from that era.

Marc W

3,782 posts

240 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
garycat said:
llewop said:
Maybe - but not by the process you suggest: car numbers are allocated on team position, after the World Champion gets number 1 on his car, the remainder of numbers are allocated by finishing order in the constructors championship.

So depending on what Button does; Hamilton is likely to end up with number 5 (or 6)(as you say - but because McLaren were 3rd in the CWC), number 2 (if Button jumps to McLaren!) or even number 7 or 8 if Button were to jump somewhere else!

Odds on you are right though...McLaren then just need to get the right tin of paint out!!

  • For once I've not checked the FIA regs to confirm my intepretation, so could be wrong!
I can't see McLaren painting the car number red unless it is a part of their Santander/Vodafone livery. They never were fans of Mansell, and Lewis personally has always cited Senna as his main inspiration from that era.
I think that was the original point, that Mclren already do have red numbers so if Lewis was Number 5 it would be in red. Although it's possible they may choose to paint them some other colour next year!

BigBen

12,155 posts

259 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
garycat said:
They never were fans of Mansell,
Or perhaps were right until he drove for them!

andyps

7,819 posts

311 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
BigBen said:
garycat said:
They never were fans of Mansell,
Or perhaps were right until he drove for them!
Ron Dennis had always said he wasn't interested in Mansell, when McLaren signed him Ron said the right thing about having changed his mind etc. although there was undoubtedly a lot of pressure from sponsors and even more from Bernie to take him. By mid season any enthusiasm had definitely gone! It wasn't a great car from McLaren that year, however.

BigBen

12,155 posts

259 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
andyps said:
BigBen said:
garycat said:
They never were fans of Mansell,
Or perhaps were right until he drove for them!
Ron Dennis had always said he wasn't interested in Mansell, when McLaren signed him Ron said the right thing about having changed his mind etc. although there was undoubtedly a lot of pressure from sponsors and even more from Bernie to take him. By mid season any enthusiasm had definitely gone! It wasn't a great car from McLaren that year, however.
I think the car was at least half of the problem and Mansell said at the time he did not come back to fight for mid grid positions, which was fairly arrogant but could also see his point.

mikefacel

610 posts

217 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
Can we have "27" on a Ferrari as well please.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
That is such a classic image (to us lower-middle-aged ones, anyway).

Simes205

5,020 posts

257 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
mikefacel said:
Can we have "27" on a Ferrari as well please.
yes please. and gold wheels too?






2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,006 posts

264 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
How did Hill end up being 0?

ajprice

33,319 posts

225 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
How did Hill end up being 0?
http://atlasf1.autosport.com/2000/nov22/faq.html

Mansell won and left F1 for the American series, so because Williams were the winning team but there wasn't a winning driver, they had 0 and 2, Prost didn't want 0 so Hill had it, Prost won the championship that year and then retired, so Hill had 0 again the year after.

Edited by ajprice on Monday 9th November 21:06

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
getting slightly off the topic, mansell was unfairly blamed for the mclaren debacle. granted he could be somewhat petulant, although i remain a big mansell fan, however the car he was given was an absolute pig. it was just a sack of s--t which was slow, cumbersome, incredibly ugly, handled crap & was generally an all round bad car.

hardly mansells fault was it?

i do however think it would be good to see red 5 on lewis's car. i think that lewis is one of the best racers of the current era & i genuinely think that had this years mclaren been good from the start he would have retained his title.

i was at the mercedes bash @ brooklands yesterday. it was a good day out & gave the fans - remember us bernie?- the chance to see some current pukka f1 cars up close. the track was wet however lewis put on a great show as did anthony davidson in the brawn.

more please. the fans need the chance to see these great machines up close & personal...

the highlight for me was lewis. at the end of his last f1 demo he jumped into an amg mercedes saloon with his brother nick in the front passenger seat. at the end of the straight he had the thing sideways. i could clearly see nick with a huge grin on his face. surely the happiest bloke out there yesterday.

how good it was to see lewis having some fun with his brother. great stuff lewis. thank you.

it was a joy to behold. i hope that you are proud of your brother. he is an inspiration to us all by not using his disability to seek sympathy. he enjoys himself & it is clear just how much lewis thinks of his brother.


P924

1,272 posts

211 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
ajprice said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
How did Hill end up being 0?
http://atlasf1.autosport.com/2000/nov22/faq.html

Mansell won and left F1 for the American series, so because Williams were the winning team but there wasn't a winning driver, they had 0 and 2, Prost didn't want 0 so Hill had it, Prost won the championship that year and then retired, so Hill had 0 again the year after.

Edited by ajprice on Monday 9th November 21:06
From memory, Prost was given the choice of number, and responded with "Who wants to drive nothing"

Teppic

8,075 posts

286 months

Monday 9th November 2009
quotequote all
P924 said:
ajprice said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
How did Hill end up being 0?
http://atlasf1.autosport.com/2000/nov22/faq.html

Mansell won and left F1 for the American series, so because Williams were the winning team but there wasn't a winning driver, they had 0 and 2, Prost didn't want 0 so Hill had it, Prost won the championship that year and then retired, so Hill had 0 again the year after.

Edited by ajprice on Monday 9th November 21:06
From memory, Prost was given the choice of number, and responded with "Who wants to drive nothing"
I think it was actually "Who wants to be a zero?"

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 10th November 2009
quotequote all
Mansell couldn't fit in the McLaren they built for him, his hips were too wide for the tub they made, so they lost a lot of time whilst they produced a wider tub. You could say he should be able to live with that lack of comfort, but driving position is paramount when you have such long races with high G, you also have to remember he was still recovering from a very badly damaged back from his indy car crash at Pheonix. It was all downhill from there.

Muzzer

3,814 posts

250 months

Tuesday 10th November 2009
quotequote all
Teppic said:
P924 said:
ajprice said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
How did Hill end up being 0?
http://atlasf1.autosport.com/2000/nov22/faq.html

Mansell won and left F1 for the American series, so because Williams were the winning team but there wasn't a winning driver, they had 0 and 2, Prost didn't want 0 so Hill had it, Prost won the championship that year and then retired, so Hill had 0 again the year after.

Edited by ajprice on Monday 9th November 21:06
From memory, Prost was given the choice of number, and responded with "Who wants to drive nothing"
I think it was actually "Who wants to be a zero?"
yes Senna had the same viewpoint IINM.

I think the drivers should be able to choose their numbers and stick with them, like they do in MotoGP. But then F1 could learn a lot from MotoGP in terms of being a bit more relaxed and not having stupid rules for unnecessary things....

Ferrari obviously had their famous 27 but I also remember the days when Tyrell were traditionally numbers 3 and 4. Didn't McLaren have 7 and 8 when they weren't carrying the first two numbers (which wasn't often back in my early F1 days!)

NewMetalSystem

351 posts

208 months

Tuesday 10th November 2009
quotequote all
Was there this much fuss in '03 when a British driver had the red number five on his car?