Senna's pole lap 1991
Senna's pole lap 1991
Author
Discussion

rhysenna

Original Poster:

689 posts

215 months

Friday 27th August 2010
quotequote all
Just watching Senna's lap from 1991, he did a 1'47. I know the bus stop chicane has been changed but looking back over the last 20 yrs the times are pretty much the same, give or take <>2secs maybe. 2002 aside, I'am I missing something regarding track changes? What I'am asking is have the lap times been so close for the last 20 years?

Senna's lap.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5b5xi7idlE

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Friday 27th August 2010
quotequote all
Its a fairly low downforce track, so all the aerodynamic advances don't make much difference, and Senna has probably got more power/torque than current F1 cars too.

rhysenna

Original Poster:

689 posts

215 months

Friday 27th August 2010
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Its a fairly low downforce track, so all the aerodynamic advances don't make much difference, and Senna has probably got more power/torque than current F1 cars too.
The cars at the end of the V10 era had 950-1000hp. In 1991 they had about 750hp.

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
rhysenna said:
EDLT said:
Its a fairly low downforce track, so all the aerodynamic advances don't make much difference, and Senna has probably got more power/torque than current F1 cars too.
The cars at the end of the V10 era had 950-1000hp. In 1991 they had about 750hp.
I think he had a 3.5 litre V12 engine in 1991.

La source has been reprofiled since then. As has Eau Rouge. As has Les Combes. As has Fagnes. As has the bus-stop. All very important sections of the track for laptime.

Like a previous poster said, Spa is a low downforce track. Aerodynamic advance here will not be as apparent as, say, Monaco where the laptime has come down by over 10 seconds within that time(including circuit changes there too.

Bear in mind how the cars have changed over that time. Senna's 1991 car was wide track, wide slicks, wide wings, front wing endplates with Ti strips on the bottom so they could run very close to the ground.

The car he drove was a lot purer (purer is the wrong word to use, but I can't think of a better one) than the heavily regulated and compromised cars that we have now.

Evangelion

8,620 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
I may not have liked the cars then but they're still infinitely preferable to what we have to put up with watching now.

And what a cracking lap too! The master at his peak.

NewMetalSystem

351 posts

208 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
Great find! Amazing lap. Really puts me in the mood for qually! smile

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
Another thing to consider.

The Pomeroy index has Mansell's 1992 Williams as one of the fastest cars ever. Senna's 1991 McLaren was no slouch.

kusee pee

1,021 posts

232 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
I watched that lap live! It was awesome - the thing that got me was that he looked slower than the others but put it on pole; taught me a lesson about how to drive fast!

stephen300o

15,464 posts

257 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
Despite all the distraction on the lap too.

DieselGriff

5,160 posts

288 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
Despite all the distraction on the lap too.
Just what I was thinking - he didn't feel the need to shake his fist at the slower cars, just drove round them.

freedman

6,015 posts

236 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
Today, every driver on the grid would have given up after seeing two slower cars at Eau Rouge and been whining on their radios about being held up

F1GTRUeno

6,512 posts

247 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
Seriously annoying seeing how good that car looks and sounds versus the monstrosities that race around nowadays.

Also annoying how anyone can go through Eau Rouge flat out now without a hint of trouble.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

257 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
Seriously annoying seeing how good that car looks and sounds versus the monstrosities that race around nowadays.

Also annoying how anyone can go through Eau Rouge flat out now without a hint of trouble.
I think they look good. smile

kiteless

12,557 posts

233 months

Saturday 28th August 2010
quotequote all
So, in real terms, on a given track unchanged between 1991 and 2010, F1 cars are getting slower.

Brilliant.

Rose tinted specs are becoming more attractive.

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
God that looks good!

The circuit seems remarkably unchanged as far as I can see, though the road section from La Source looks bumpier to me.

When you think about all the restrictions they have now it's quite amazing that they aren't even slower these days. In 1991 they had 3.5 engines, big wide cars with wide wings, huge sticky Goodyear Eagles (in competition with other tyre makers). Not to mention driver aids etc

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
That was great! Thanks for posting.

Hmmm - the cars were fab then and isn't it lovely to have nothing but the sound of what's going on on-track so you can listen to the car and what the driver is doing, Senna's mid corner 'tap,tap,tap' on the throttle for example, instead of some retard prattling on about his haircut...

stephen300o

15,464 posts

257 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
Asterix said:
That was great! Thanks for posting.

Hmmm - the cars were fab then and isn't it lovely to have nothing but the sound of what's going on on-track so you can listen to the car and what the driver is doing, Senna's mid corner 'tap,tap,tap' on the throttle for example, instead of some retard prattling on about his haircut...
Yes very interesting to just hear the car(Ayrton's famous throttle style), I think the BBC coms should shut up for a bit sometimes like in NASCAR, except I think the US coms have more of an idea what their director is up to over there.

freedman

6,015 posts

236 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
AJS- said:
When you think about all the restrictions they have now it's quite amazing that they aren't even slower these days. In 1991 they had 3.5 engines, big wide cars with wide wings, huge sticky Goodyear Eagles (in competition with other tyre makers). Not to mention driver aids etc
Driver aids?

McLaren were still using an H pattern manual gearbox on the MP4/6

Todays cars have far more 'aids' on then than that car did

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
scratchchin

To a certain extent I am with you. But in 1991, we were onlý 2 years away from the cars that would reputedly drive themselves around the track. I think that McLaren were a bit behind Williams in the electronic war that went on in F1, but they weren't that far behind. I couldn't say for sure what the MP4/7 had or didn't have though.

harry010

4,423 posts

216 months

Sunday 29th August 2010
quotequote all
^ I tend to agree - I think that McLaren had worked out the paddleshift gearbox by that point in the 91 season (Williams started the year with it and it was only really reliability problems that were caused by the new semi automatic that allowed Senna to pull out a lead early on that in the end was enough to take the championship) and there were certainly lots of clever things going on during this season and the couple after. That being said, an epic lap "for sure" - traffic didn't seem to be a problem then did it... wink