Junction 9 and 10 on the M40... petition...

Junction 9 and 10 on the M40... petition...

Author
Discussion

ginettag27

Original Poster:

6,563 posts

284 months

Friday 20th June 2008
quotequote all
Please sign this online petition, and let others know!!

The government are looking to build some Eco Towns, one will be the Oxford side of Junction 9 of the M40. This junction is already notoriously bad for traffic problems and will
only get worse. They’re looking to put a town of 15-20,000 homes in the unspoilt countryside. This will impact traffic on the M40, specifically junctions 9 and 10 and also the A34 and A46..
Junctions 9 and 10 are already notoriously troublesome and will only get worse!

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/WestonOtmoor/

Other negative points include :

1) It is too close to the M.40 and A.34 to make it at all likely that residents could be persuaded to use rail or other public transport.
2) It is on a flood plain!
3) It would involve the destruction of part of a Site of Special Scientific Interest on the nature reserve at Otmoor.
4) It is very close to Bicester which is already targeted for significant housing expansion and the ex USAF base at Heyford which is a genuine brown field site and which is also under consideration for significant housing development.
5) It is too close to the existing towns of Bicester, Kidlington, Woodstock, Witney and Oxford to be considered in any way self-sustaining.
6) Much of Weston on the green itself is within a conservation area.

regards

Phil

ginettag27

Original Poster:

6,563 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th June 2008
quotequote all
bump!

this will adversely affect traffic on the M40 in general and around these two junctions in particular. The planned Eco Town will be bigger than Bicester!

alock

4,396 posts

226 months

Tuesday 24th June 2008
quotequote all
I'm guessing you live near here?

I'm just pleased the one near me has been cancelled.

ginettag27

Original Poster:

6,563 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th June 2008
quotequote all
yes I do! Although the M40 between 9 and 10 is bad enough as it is, extra traffic will only further compound the problem!

GreatGranny

9,519 posts

241 months

Thursday 26th June 2008
quotequote all
What a redicleous idea.

Build an eco town that can't sustain itself so people have to travel to work. They will not be big enough to sustain public transport so you can bet a majority of people will commute by car.

They will not do anything for the housing shortage and will be white elephants. The houses will be more expensive than a normal house unless help is given to purchase them and most are earmarked for green field sites!

ginettag27

Original Poster:

6,563 posts

284 months

Thursday 26th June 2008
quotequote all
indeed, although they are going to give the new town it's own railway station..

15,000 properties = at least 30,000 people, probably more..

Watch the M40 slow down considerably - now is your time to stop it from becoming a reality, not once it happens and there's nothing you can do about it.

captinbucket

1 posts

204 months

Monday 7th July 2008
quotequote all
I love it... eco towns built on sssi's- you couldn't make it up...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

285 months

Monday 7th July 2008
quotequote all
I worked on Heyford 13 years ago, they were talking about massive housing developments on the site then.

I cant see this happening any time soon to be honest.

ginettag27

Original Poster:

6,563 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th July 2008
quotequote all
Indeed, with a regeneration of Bicester, new housing of 1500 houses (South West option) and also possibly Heyford.. 1200 or so... Then they want to put an "eco" town of 15,000 houses the other side of the M40. Sit and watch the M40 around Junctions 9 and 10 literally go into meltdown. They've already stuffed junction 9 (imho) by trimming it down to 2 lanes.. Watch half asleep people casually pull across in to fast moving traffic... then wake up, oops! and don't get me started on junction 4 (High Wycombe/Handy Cross)..