TRDs 350Z GT Roadster
Discussion
I've just bought a 350Z Roadster. I figured if a car is going to make me bankrupt, like my 172 has done, it may as well be something a bit more special.
I'm loving it. Yes more a GT car than Sports car, but I love the torque, noise and comfort.
Fantastic car. Loads more fun than the Clio. Downsides - High road tax £475, heavy - 1600+ KG, thirsty - 22 MPG (not surprised, though), probably no faster than a decent hot hatch these days.
Plus sides - Best sounding 6-pot I've heard. Fantastic RWD handling, surprisingly nimble for what it is. Does sports car and luxury in one package.
Stuff to do - clicky axle (a bit of grease needed), repaint cubby button, renew droplinks.


I have video of the noise but not a good idea to post it publicly!
I'm loving it. Yes more a GT car than Sports car, but I love the torque, noise and comfort.
Fantastic car. Loads more fun than the Clio. Downsides - High road tax £475, heavy - 1600+ KG, thirsty - 22 MPG (not surprised, though), probably no faster than a decent hot hatch these days.
Plus sides - Best sounding 6-pot I've heard. Fantastic RWD handling, surprisingly nimble for what it is. Does sports car and luxury in one package.
Stuff to do - clicky axle (a bit of grease needed), repaint cubby button, renew droplinks.


I have video of the noise but not a good idea to post it publicly!
Edited by TameRacingDriver on Saturday 22 September 23:37
These are lovely, it's good that you've accepted that it is more a GT car though because they're so damn heavy!
What annoyed me about my gen7 Celica and from what I can see in your pictures is the obvious omission of a sat-nav tv screen in favour of a rather clumsy looking cubby hole. On the Celica it was like operating a bin lid; just didn't look great, I'm sure with a bit more thought in both instances the space could have been better designed!
What annoyed me about my gen7 Celica and from what I can see in your pictures is the obvious omission of a sat-nav tv screen in favour of a rather clumsy looking cubby hole. On the Celica it was like operating a bin lid; just didn't look great, I'm sure with a bit more thought in both instances the space could have been better designed!
Mastodon2 said:
I presume it's got an aftermarket exhaust on? The standard ones sound disappointing.
Apparently its a Cobra exhaust.I posted a vid on youtube and a link on 350z-uk but was advised not a good idea, despite IMO not being particularly OTT driving, and it sounded lovely on the vid. I can upload it somewhere and send you the link if you wish?
TameRacingDriver said:
Apparently its a Cobra exhaust.
I posted a vid on youtube and a link on 350z-uk but was advised not a good idea, despite IMO not being particularly OTT driving, and it sounded lovely on the vid. I can upload it somewhere and send you the link if you wish?
Good to hear, Cobra make some decent stuff at a reasonable price, and as far as I'm concerned if you are getting 22mpg then being able to hear the V6 properly is part of getting your monies worth from the petrol I posted a vid on youtube and a link on 350z-uk but was advised not a good idea, despite IMO not being particularly OTT driving, and it sounded lovely on the vid. I can upload it somewhere and send you the link if you wish?

As for the vid, sounds cool but if the driving is er, exuberant, it might be better to keep it for the private collection!
TameRacingDriver said:
Apparently its a Cobra exhaust.
I posted a vid on youtube and a link on 350z-uk but was advised not a good idea, despite IMO not being particularly OTT driving, and it sounded lovely on the vid. I can upload it somewhere and send you the link if you wish?
Could always just post the sound alone.I posted a vid on youtube and a link on 350z-uk but was advised not a good idea, despite IMO not being particularly OTT driving, and it sounded lovely on the vid. I can upload it somewhere and send you the link if you wish?
hughcam said:
tbc said:
that gold/yellow leather on the seats makes me wretch, dreadful
Please go troll on a cake forum or something. Anywhere else apart from car forums and/or pistonheads. Car looks great O/P! Whats the acceleration like in comparison to the 172?
people put forth their cars for critique and comments from other forum members, we all have different taste and automotive requirements so it is inevitable that opinions will vary
in this case i agree with tbc, stonking car with vile coloured seats
OK, I've done a more "politically correct" video here, a bit shorter, straight to the point.
Well, as politically correct as revving a 3.5 litre engine to the red line gets anyway
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn3jdx1ObH0&fea...
Well, as politically correct as revving a 3.5 litre engine to the red line gets anyway

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn3jdx1ObH0&fea...
TameRacingDriver said:
OK, I've done a more "politically correct" video here, a bit shorter, straight to the point.
Well, as politically correct as revving a 3.5 litre engine to the red line gets anyway
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn3jdx1ObH0&fea...
sounds brilliant Well, as politically correct as revving a 3.5 litre engine to the red line gets anyway

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn3jdx1ObH0&fea...

hughcam said:
Car looks great O/P! Whats the acceleration like in comparison to the 172?
Not much in it up to about 60 from a standing start (Clio was about 6.6 secs versus 6 for this one). However, above that, you can really feel the extra power, although on the road you wouldn't be pulling a big lead until the speeds got highly illegal. Above 100 leptons it FAR quicker, but of course I've never tried officer!Its the mid range acceleration that is the biggest difference, in 5th gear the urge even from 30 mph is like the clio in 3rd.
Gassing Station | Readers' Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



The seats are an acquired taste, I'll say that much. If I got them retrimmed it probably wouldn't be that colour, but they don't look so bad in the flesh in fairness.