Teddy's C2 W.I.P
Discussion
It looked like a van when the drug dealer tints were added and the car was black. I'll never understand why people want to arse around with a shopping car but if it makes you happy then fair enough. As long as you drive sensibly and don’t disrupt the peace like many cars of that nature do then good work and good luck with it in the future.
I actually quite like this does not seem to be too cluttered with plastic tatt like some other saxo's yet it is modified but personally I think it looks rather nice.
I would say have so far not don’t to bad on spending but would leave it as it is to be honest no point to spend any more it looks quite nice and c2's interior is okay anyway if it owes you 6k is a lot but not bad I know of saxo's which have had 12k spent on and look utter w
k so you have not done too bad.
In my view keep it as it is now looks nice and good car to build up a few years no claims in as only a 1.1 then when you can drive properly (same with me) look at getting something better and more powerful
I would say have so far not don’t to bad on spending but would leave it as it is to be honest no point to spend any more it looks quite nice and c2's interior is okay anyway if it owes you 6k is a lot but not bad I know of saxo's which have had 12k spent on and look utter w
k so you have not done too bad.In my view keep it as it is now looks nice and good car to build up a few years no claims in as only a 1.1 then when you can drive properly (same with me) look at getting something better and more powerful

what a waste of money, I like the bit about the sound your fart can makes being "awesome". It doesnt, it'll sound like a a crappy untuned low capacity 4 pot with a stupid exhaust on it. Did you even bother reading this forum before you posted?Also
C2Teddy said:
Window Tints, 94% on rear and 40% on front.
the law said:
Motor Vehicles first used on or after 1 April 1985:
The light transmitted through the windscreen must be at least 75%.
The front side windows must allow at least 70% of light to be transmitted through them.
so your car has illegal windows you tit, lets hope you dont kill anyone.The light transmitted through the windscreen must be at least 75%.
The front side windows must allow at least 70% of light to be transmitted through them.
Edited by deevlash on Sunday 16th August 00:28
Looks alright, my only gripe is, why the hell didn't they unbolt the rear wiper arm, it can be done! Unless they were feeling particularly angry and in a "vengeance" mood with the air saw 
I think it looks good, but would require some sort of bodykit to pull that paintjob off, a nice "euro look" one colour paintjob, and smoothed exterior would suit it better IMO.

I think it looks good, but would require some sort of bodykit to pull that paintjob off, a nice "euro look" one colour paintjob, and smoothed exterior would suit it better IMO.

Gassing Station | Readers' Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


