Vectra GSI by MSD
Author
Discussion

insanelewis21

Original Poster:

76 posts

190 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Had her 15 months now and i still love her.

2.5 v6 by MSD (196hp) with
3.8 bar fuel pressure reg
mahooosiv Ramair induction kit.
7000k HID kit.

i wanted to keep it fairly std as i think they were one of the best looking saloon/hatchs of that era.




CraigW

12,248 posts

310 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I did always like the way the mirrors swept out, is it quick?

Edited by CraigW on Friday 8th October 14:32

soad

34,550 posts

204 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
What's MSD? Tuning company of sorts?

Looks okay. More power is good too. Is it thirsty?

SHutchinson

2,327 posts

212 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I'm slightly biased (ex admin on vvoc.com) but they're a really decent car for the money. I've recently sold a a persia saloon (the pic is in my profile) that I'd owned for the last 7 years. I could never bring myself to sell it so used to keep it for shows etc. Anyway, I wrote it off at xmas and sold it to a guy who has rebuilt it to a very high standard.

Edited by SHutchinson on Friday 8th October 14:45

NotNormal

2,420 posts

242 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
soad said:
What's MSD? Tuning company of sorts?
Could say that, Motor Sport Developments. Used to run Vauxhalls BTCC effort during the days they championed the Vectra before Triple Eight took over the reigns.

MSD had a finger in the upgrades for the road going Vectra GSi and also the subsiquent limited edition version.

insanelewis21

Original Poster:

76 posts

190 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
its not bad, i think the build quality of vauxhall in this timeline were far superior to the compitition, with full electric recaros.

i found a web site that said lotus had a say in the chasis, and the wheels were by O.Z although there are no markings.

as far as performance, im only 23 and went to this from a 1.8 vec so to me when i first got it i felt like i was in a STI lol

She is hard work to get off the line, bit of a fatty.

she will sit and cruise around 130 all day long, runs out of gas around 148.

I am an estate agent, and when i have a busy day on the road i can get as little as 15mpg!

insanelewis21

Original Poster:

76 posts

190 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
SHutchinson said:
I'm slightly biased (ex admin on vvoc.com) but they're a really decent car for the money. I've recently sold a a persia saloon (the pic is in my profile) that I'd owned for the last 7 years. I could never bring myself to sell it so used to keep it for shows etc. Anyway, I wrote it off at xmas and sold it to a guy who has rebuilt it to a very high standard.

Edited by SHutchinson on Friday 8th October 14:45
i think i have seen quite a few of your posts!

DaveL86

884 posts

205 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Why 8000k HID? surely 4300/5000 would be the best choice for light output.

Edited by DaveL86 on Friday 8th October 19:47

H100S

1,436 posts

201 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I had a minter a few years ago, loved it but hated the economy. A great sounding engine with induction kit and handled better than most people would give it credit for.

A picture attached. Quite rare as a hatch in this colour. I had the irmscher lower and upper grille fitted with the prefacelift surround instead of the chrome, also irmscher side repeaters to finish off.

bertelli_1

2,420 posts

238 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I used to work for MSD making these, I may have even converted your car! They were pretty capable & we even did a couple of 'special' ones with a 3.0 litre engine, ported & polished heads, remap, full leather (inc door cards), low final drive & an LSD. I can't remember who made the wheels but they were supplied by TSW & fitted with Yokohama tyres.

eta: the op's car looks like a 2.6 not 2.5. The 2.5 had different wheels, bumper, side skirts, headlights. Also all 4 camshafts were changed on the 2.6, only the inlet cams on the 2.5.

Edited by bertelli_1 on Saturday 9th October 09:14

stevenr

944 posts

222 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
bertelli_1 said:
eta: the op's car looks like a 2.6 not 2.5. The 2.5 had different wheels, bumper, side skirts, headlights. Also all 4 camshafts were changed on the 2.6, only the inlet cams on the 2.5
They made a facelift 2.5 before doing the 2.6's though.

Mine's a pre FL 2.5 with the FL front end.(bumper,grille and headlights)


OP,nice looking car you have there

Bungleaio

6,576 posts

230 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Never driven one but I've always liked the look of these GSi's. Nice looking example OP.

150bhp

908 posts

200 months

Monday 11th October 2010
quotequote all
Always liked the look of these but i owned a 1999 Vectra Sri 140 and tbh it was the worst car I've ever owned. The handling was utterly appalling, terrible driving position, etc. How does the Gsi handle and hows the mpg? My Sri drank petrol and it was dog slow frown
Yours looks good though.

gj88

1,961 posts

222 months

Monday 11th October 2010
quotequote all
DaveL86 said:
Why 8000k HID? surely 4300/5000 would be the best choice for light output.

Edited by DaveL86 on Friday 8th October 19:47
I suspect the owner wanted the modified blue headlight look.

IROC-Z

540 posts

219 months

Monday 11th October 2010
quotequote all
insanelewis21 said:
She is hard work to get off the line, bit of a fatty.
That's such a good way of describing it laugh I had a dark green X reg GSi hatchback and before that I had a Cavalier V6. Both of them needed working hard to get going, but once you've got it wound up it really pulled hard.

As for the fuel economy I used to average about 31mpg, it was slightly more economical than my Mondeo ST24. You guys must be caning yours everywhere!

H100S

1,436 posts

201 months

Tuesday 12th October 2010
quotequote all
Mine did 24mpg and never ever did i get more than 28 even on a run. Handling wise mine was stock but had a geometary gone, good tyres and i though it was awsome. Faster you went the better it got just like the engine they need provoking to get the best from them. I found it was not until you really pushed one that they showed them self.

During my ownership mine only ever had a egr pipe split (common) otherwise nothing ever went wrong with it.

A lightened fly wheel makes the world of difference to these motors as the stock ones are obese. If the economy was not so bad i would still be driving it.

insanelewis21

Original Poster:

76 posts

190 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
been a while since i have been on here.

prob really thick thing to say, but im guessing op means original poster??

they lights are 6k HIDs not something i would of done, but they were already fitted.

coming up to 24 months of ownership now, and everything is still great. (touches wood)

the 2.5 MSD was made up until 2001 roughly then went to the 2.6 fly by wire version, which had less HP but more torque, aparently they suffer with sensors and ecu problems.

have now fitter a de silenced centre section with a 6x4 magnex back box.
in the engine bay, i have a Ramair JS-108 cone with cold air feed.

other pans include, getting a 2nd vectra. Must be a saloon and pref a 2ltr.

She will become a z20let/z20leh powered BTCC rep! so im looking forward to start that and will get a project thread up.

smile

djdestiny

6,542 posts

206 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
I had one too, a prefacelift GSI estate which were very rare.
I loved its looks but it was so slow and the mpg was crap compared to the performance.
The Recaros were very uncomfortable, I didnt keep it long due to these factors


dannytherev

2,370 posts

213 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Always liked thesethumbup remember when I worked for my local Vauxhall dealer back in 2000 trying to get hold these cars was very hard

Greg_D

6,542 posts

274 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Any idea why they increased the fuel pressure? Assuming that vaux set them up right in the first place, why would they need more fuel?all it would do is run rich, the intake wouldn't require it