987 Boxster
Author
Discussion

clarki

Original Poster:

1,366 posts

250 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
So, we're thinking of a boxster next.

Been looking at 05 and 06 3.2S's.

Just wondering if there is anything in particular to look out for or if there are any must-haves with these cars. All looked very shiney in showrooms and the salepeople seemed very convincing, but we're in no great rush. The right car/deal will crop up i'm sure.

Many thanks.

mollytherocker

14,472 posts

240 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
clarki said:
All looked very shiney in showrooms and the salepeople seemed very convincing,
This is not going to end well.biggrin

MTR

Thom987

3,185 posts

197 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
Look for a 3.4, they are even shinier.

khushy

3,984 posts

250 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
Thom987 said:
Look for a 3.4, they are even shinier.
everyone knows this ^ FFS!

khushy

Durzel

13,027 posts

199 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
If it's anything like the Cayman then it'll be made up in the options.

On the assumption that Boxster options are probably very similar to the Cayman, check out this page and decide what you want. smile

Cars with more options will command a higher premium but also present a wider market come resale.

andyrno1

40 posts

260 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
Just buy the best example you can on your budget and where possible never buy without a warranty or without the cash to take one out.

Main dealer service history is critical to start with and Porsche specialist stamps are ok later on but watch the stamps and the mileage as a major service needed soon is over £600 at the OPC and that's as long as they don't find anything else wrong!

Test everything works-even if it's a dealer.

It's always good to buy after somebody else has lost lots of money!

As previously said the more gadgets the better : )

Andy.

davey68

1,199 posts

268 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
Not wishing to scare the OP but is the 3.2 engine less likely to throw up scored bore issues and major engine problems? Thought i read somewhere that the larger the capacity of the flat six the more likely it could develop problems down the line?

mollytherocker

14,472 posts

240 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
davey68 said:
Not wishing to scare the OP but is the 3.2 engine less likely to throw up scored bore issues and major engine problems? Thought i read somewhere that the larger the capacity of the flat six the more likely it could develop problems down the line?
The 3.2 has thicker bores and better cooling so MAY be better.

MTR

RudeDog

1,670 posts

205 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
If you ask in this forum you'll never be any wiser...

You need to get one with 19" wheels so that it looks good but actually you need one with 17" wheels so that it drives better. Make sure its got Sport Chrono for added Pzazz but don't get one with the Sport Chrono clock on the dash because nobody likes that. You'll want it to have Sat Nav otherwise you'll never be able to sell it on but you'll also need a TomTom because the Porsche Nav is rubbish. Get one in White because its the cool colour but whatever you do, don't get one in white because you'll look like a chav.

hehe

mollytherocker

14,472 posts

240 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
RudeDog said:
If you ask in this forum you'll never be any wiser...

You need to get one with 19" wheels so that it looks good but actually you need one with 17" wheels so that it drives better. Make sure its got Sport Chrono for added Pzazz but don't get one with the Sport Chrono clock on the dash because nobody likes that. You'll want it to have Sat Nav otherwise you'll never be able to sell it on but you'll also need a TomTom because the Porsche Nav is rubbish. Get one in White because its the cool colour but whatever you do, don't get one in white because you'll look like a chav.

hehe
biggrin Indeed. Dont forget that the engine will expire shortly if you floor it from the lights but 95% are OK so theres no problem and if you didnt get a warranty its your fault.

MTR

andyrno1

40 posts

260 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
Agree with most of thatsmile
But have to say im running 19" wheels and i dont have any handling/comfort issues.
The car looks better with them as well.........

GJB

472 posts

289 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
clarki said:
So, we're thinking of a boxster next.

Been looking at 05 and 06 3.2S's.

Just wondering if there is anything in particular to look out for or if there are any must-haves with these cars. All looked very shiney in showrooms and the salepeople seemed very convincing, but we're in no great rush. The right car/deal will crop up i'm sure.

Many thanks.
Mrs changed cars from a Boxster 986S to a 987S. Even she noticed the difference (this from someone who drove a Renault Laguna on flat tyres and didn't notice). It's a 2005 model with lots of extras most of which get used. Sat Nav dated and stupid phone system but other than that we use the multi-CD changer, Bose, heated seats and that's about it really. Car has 19" S wheels which look right for the car. Ride is very good even though the tyres look like rubber bands. Performance, handling and brakes are superb and nothing beats the roof down experience on a nice day with the sports exhaust bouncing off walls. It will no doubt do 160mph if required but we tend to go cross country when we have time so that we can enjoy open to the elements driving. Roof closes pretty quickly if a shower appears.

alcatraz236

197 posts

183 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
andyrno1 said:
Agree with most of thatsmile
But have to say im running 19" wheels and i dont have any handling/comfort issues.
The car looks better with them as well.........
...but rudedog was right because someone will just come on here (i.e. me) and say that they prefer the ride and look of 18's smile

Thom987

3,185 posts

197 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
alcatraz236 said:
andyrno1 said:
Agree with most of thatsmile
But have to say im running 19" wheels and i dont have any handling/comfort issues.
The car looks better with them as well.........
...but rudedog was right because someone will just come on here (i.e. me) and say that they prefer the ride and look of 18's smile
Slam it on 20"s

andyrno1

40 posts

260 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
Just to change the thread slightly I still remember test driving a 3.2s Boxster around 2003 and went like a bat out of hell but my 3.4s doesn't seem as crazy!
Did they change gear box ratios or something to explain it or is it just the fact I don't cane my own car?
Any thoughts on this?
Andy.

RudeDog

1,670 posts

205 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
andyrno1 said:
Just to change the thread slightly I still remember test driving a 3.2s Boxster around 2003 and went like a bat out of hell but my 3.4s doesn't seem as crazy!
Did they change gear box ratios or something to explain it or is it just the fact I don't cane my own car?
Any thoughts on this?
Andy.
You're probably just getting old tongue out

andyrno1

40 posts

260 months

Wednesday 12th October 2011
quotequote all
I know but if it's ment to be near 300bhp mine feels like 250bhp.
Now maybe later models are more civilised in their delivery or maybe it's old age but if I didn't have the Fireblade to get the adrenaline rush I wouldn't get it from the Boxster!
Maybe I need 400 bhp?
Andy.
Ps-when I was younger I had a new mitubishi evo 6 and that was 300 bhp and felt very fast!
It's was just too plasticky though!

Edited by andyrno1 on Wednesday 12th October 00:17

RudeDog

1,670 posts

205 months

Wednesday 12th October 2011
quotequote all
I had a Subaru Impreza WRX STi Type-R (version V) and that was explosively fast, much, much quicker than my Cayman S. I love the Cayman but its a quick car, not a fast one (in a straight line).

nerfherder

250 posts

234 months

Wednesday 12th October 2011
quotequote all
andyrno1 said:
Did they change gear box ratios or something to explain it or is it just the fact I don't cane my own car?
It is quite easy to drive the Boxster at low-mid revs and it produces fairly reasonable acceleration. But, to get the best acceleration, you really need to use the higher end of the rev range (power delivery increases pretty linearly until about 6,500rpm). Remember, 2nd gear goes up to around 70MPH, so for maximum attack you should mostly be in 2nd and 3rd gears.

Edited by nerfherder on Wednesday 12th October 09:34

Hawmaws

575 posts

201 months

Wednesday 12th October 2011
quotequote all
andyrno1 said:
Just to change the thread slightly I still remember test driving a 3.2s Boxster around 2003 and went like a bat out of hell but my 3.4s doesn't seem as crazy!
Did they change gear box ratios or something to explain it or is it just the fact I don't cane my own car?
Any thoughts on this?
Andy.
I've gone from a 3.2 to a 3.4 and I agree with this..the 3.2 felt a lot more urgent and responsive at the bottom end. The bigger engine sounds and feels a bit more civilised.. not always in a good way.

In particular, the exhaust note on the 3.2 is better (which makes it sound faster!), and if the newer car didn't have a PSE I'd be pretty disappointed with the sound it makes.